Containing Transaction Costs in ERP Implementation through Identification of Strategic Learning Projects

Implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems requires in-depth understanding of the idiosyncrasies of the receiving organization, thus implying specific learning costs. ERP projects delivered in form of contracted projects in a competitive market environment often ignore costs for competitive reasons (Linderoth & Lundqvist, 2004). However, these learning costs add to the overall transaction costs of a project. If not budgeted into the individual projects, these costs accumulate at the project portfolio level of project delivery organizations (sellers) and must be managed adequately. One way of minimizing learning costs at the portfolio level is to identify strategic learning projects, which accrue higher than planned (competitive) costs, but lower the costs of future projects and thereby the overall learning costs at the portfolio level. The present study investigated the practices of dealing with costs of learning projects at a Swedish ERP consultancy over a period of six months. The results show how to lower portfolio-level project costs in the long-term through identification of strategic learning projects, with expected budget overruns in the short-term. The study takes a transaction-costs-economic (TCE) perspective. A model shows the impact of short-term learning investments on the lowering of implementation risks in future projects. The model can be used by managers for understanding long-term profitability by exceeding time and budget objectives in the short term.

[1]  Peter Y. T. Sun,et al.  An investigation of barriers to knowledge transfer , 2005, J. Knowl. Manag..

[2]  Y. Kwak,et al.  Examining risk tolerance in project-driven organization , 2005 .

[3]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[4]  R. Müller,et al.  Communication and co-operation on projects between the project owner as principal and the project manager as agent , 2004 .

[5]  W. Orlikowski,et al.  An Improvisational Model of Change Management: The Case of Groupware Technologies , 1996 .

[6]  Ram L. Kumar,et al.  Managing risks in IT projects: an options perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[7]  Kam Jugdev,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[8]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The handbook of project-based management : improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives , 1998 .

[9]  Gary Klein,et al.  Reducing user-related risks during and prior to system development , 2002 .

[10]  John Groenewegen,et al.  ON ECONOMIC INSTITUTIONS , 1995 .

[11]  J. Oluwoye,et al.  An analysis of contractors' approaches to risk identification in New South Wales, Australia , 1997 .

[12]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  CASE Tools as Organizational Change: Investigating Incremental and Radical Changes in Systems Development , 1993, MIS Q..

[13]  K. Neailey,et al.  A Risk Register Database System to aid the management of project risk , 2002 .

[14]  Anthony Mills,et al.  A systematic approach to risk management for construction , 2001 .

[15]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations , 2000, Theory in CSCW.

[16]  R. Müller,et al.  A Retrospective look at our Evolving Understanding of Project Success , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[17]  Jens Ove Riis,et al.  Grundbog i Projektledelse , 2007 .

[18]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[19]  J. Rodney Turner,et al.  The versatile project-based organization: governance and operational control , 1999 .

[20]  S. M. Kinsella.  Activity-Based Costing: Does it Warrant Inclusion in a Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)? , 2002 .

[21]  Niels Lind.  Time effects in criteria for acceptable risk , 2002, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[22]  R. Müller,et al.  The impact of principal–agent relationship and contract type on communication between project owner and manager , 2005 .

[23]  Pernille Eskerod,et al.  Do Implicit Core Assumptions of the Project Management Community Culture Restrain Intra-Organisational Learning across Project Managers? , 2004 .

[24]  R. Müller,et al.  On the nature of the project as a temporary organization , 2003 .