Crowdsourcing New Product Ideas over Time: An Analysis of the Dell IdeaStorm Community

Several organizations have developed ongoing crowdsourcing communities that repeatedly collect ideas for new products and services from a large, dispersed “crowd” of nonexperts consumers over time. Despite its promises, little is known about the nature of an individual's ideation efforts in such an online community. Studying Dell's IdeaStorm community, serial ideators are found to be more likely than consumers with only one idea to generate an idea the organization finds valuable enough to implement, but they are unlikely to repeat their early success once their ideas are implemented. As ideators with past success attempt to again come up with ideas that will excite the organization, they instead end up proposing ideas similar to their ideas that were already implemented i.e., they generate less diverse ideas. The negative effects of past success are somewhat mitigated for ideators with diverse commenting activity on others' ideas. These findings highlight some of the challenges in maintaining an ongoing supply of quality ideas from the crowd over time. This paper was accepted by Kamalini Ramdas, entrepreneurship and innovation.

[1]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Innovation Tournaments: Creating and Selecting Exceptional Opportunities , 2009 .

[2]  J KornishLaura,et al.  Opportunity Spaces in Innovation , 2011 .

[3]  Pino G. Audia,et al.  Past Success and Creativity over Time: A Study of Inventors in the Hard Disk Drive Industry , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[4]  E. Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[5]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exposure effects in design: Unconscious plagiarism or a product of sampling probability? In Proceedings of NordDesign 2006, Reykandvik, Iceland , 2006 .

[6]  John Cullen,et al.  Democratizing Innovation , 2020, Encyclopedia of Creativity, Invention, Innovation and Entrepreneurship.

[7]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Idea Generation and the Quality of the Best Idea , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Product Development Decisions: A Review of the Literature , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[9]  J. Porter The disk drive industry , 1978 .

[10]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Opportunity Spaces in Innovation: Empirical Analysis of Large Samples of Ideas , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Richard L. Marsh,et al.  Item availability in cryptomnesia: Assessing its role in two paradigms of unconscious plagiarism. , 1995 .

[12]  Katrin Hussinger,et al.  “Wacky” patents meet economic indicators , 2011 .

[13]  O. Bjelland,et al.  An Inside View of IBM's 'Innovation Jam' , 2008 .

[14]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[15]  John S. Gero,et al.  Design and other types of fixation , 1996 .

[16]  E. Paul Torrance,et al.  The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking , 2012 .

[17]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[18]  Young-Hoon Park,et al.  Modeling Browsing Behavior at Multiple Websites , 2004 .

[19]  N. Maier Reasoning in humans. II. The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. , 1931 .

[20]  Ted S. Sindlinger,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd is Driving the Future of Business , 2010 .

[21]  Martin Schreier,et al.  The Value of Crowdsourcing: Can Users Really Compete with Professionals in Generating New Product Ideas? , 2009 .

[22]  A. Osborn Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Thinking , 1953 .

[23]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Steal my idea! Organizational adoption of user innovations from a user innovation community: A case study of Dell IdeaStorm , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[24]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Technology brokering and innovation in a product development firm. , 1997 .

[25]  Michael A. West,et al.  Response: Ideas are ten a penny - It's team implementation not idea generation that counts , 2002 .

[26]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Collaborative learning in asynchronous discussion groups: What about the impact on cognitive processing? , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Matti Perttula,et al.  The idea exposure paradigm in design idea generation , 2007 .

[28]  Ph. H. B. F. Franses,et al.  Censored regression analysis in large samples with many zero observations , 1999 .

[29]  Sonali K. Shah Motivation, Governance, and the Viability of Hybrid Forms in Open Source Software Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[30]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Social Side of Creativity: A Static and Dynamic Social Network Perspective , 2003 .

[31]  Alfred J. Lotka,et al.  The frequency distribution of scientific productivity , 1926 .

[32]  R. Marsh,et al.  How examples may (and may not) constrain creativity , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[33]  J. George 9 Creativity in Organizations , 2007 .

[34]  Olivier Toubia Idea Generation, Creativity, and Incentives , 2006 .

[35]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .

[36]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[37]  P. Allison Fixed Effects Regression Methods for Longitudinal Data Using SAS® , 2005 .

[38]  L. Werth,et al.  Attentional Priming Effects on Creativity , 2003 .

[39]  Svenja C. Sommer,et al.  The Effects of Problem Structure and Team Diversity on Brainstorming Effectiveness , 2009, Manag. Sci..

[40]  Steven M. Smith The constraining effects of initial ideas. , 2003 .

[41]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Incentives and Problem Uncertainty in Innovation Contests: An Empirical Analysis , 2011, Manag. Sci..

[42]  T. B. Ward Structured Imagination: the Role of Category Structure in Exemplar Generation , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Verlin B. Hinsz,et al.  The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[44]  Teresa M. Amabile,et al.  A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations , 1988 .

[45]  Jacob Goldenberg,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: The Idea Itself and the Circumstances of Its Emergence as Predictors of New Product Success , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[46]  Fiona Caldicott,et al.  Where Should We Go From Here? , 1996, European Psychiatry.

[47]  M. Lorenzen Creativity in context : Content, cost, chance and collection in the organization of the film industry , 2009 .

[48]  D. Harrison,et al.  What's the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. , 2007 .

[49]  Linus Dahlander,et al.  Open to suggestions: How organizations elicit suggestions through proactive and reactive attention , 2014 .

[50]  H. Birch,et al.  The negative effect of previous experience on productive thinking. , 1951, Journal of experimental psychology.

[51]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Finding Commercially Attractive User Innovations: A Test of Lead User Theory , 2005 .

[52]  Nicholas W. Kohn,et al.  Collaborative fixation: effects of others' ideas on brainstorming , 2011 .

[53]  Conan C. Albrecht,et al.  Motivating Content Contributions to Online Communities: Toward a More Comprehensive Theory , 2005, Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[54]  Ravi Kumar,et al.  Preferential behavior in online groups , 2008, WSDM '08.

[55]  John S. Gero,et al.  Effects of examples on the results of a design activity , 1992, Knowl. Based Syst..

[56]  J. Perry-Smith Social Yet Creative: The Role Of Social Relationships In Facilitating Individual Creativity , 2006 .

[57]  Eric F. Rietzschel,et al.  Beyond productivity loss in brainstorming groups: The evolution of a question , 2010 .

[58]  Holger Ernst,et al.  Inventors are not alike: the distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[59]  Petra Badke-Schaub,et al.  Fixation or Inspiration: Creative Problem Solving in Design , 2011 .

[60]  R. Weisberg Creativity and knowledge: A challenge to theories. , 1998 .

[61]  Christopher M. Miller,et al.  Marketing’s roles in innovation in business-to-business firms: Status, issues, and research agenda , 2013 .

[62]  Lee Fleming,et al.  Exploring the Tail of Creativity: An Evolutionary Model of Breakthrough Invention , 2006 .

[63]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  How the Group Affects the Mind: A Cognitive Model of Idea Generation in Groups , 2006, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[64]  B. Weiner An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[65]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Cognitive stimulation and interference in groups: Exposure effects in an idea generation task , 2002 .

[66]  P. Paulus,et al.  Building on the ideas of others: An examination of the idea combination process , 2011 .

[67]  R. Weisberg,et al.  Following the wrong footsteps: fixation effects of pictorial examples in a design problem-solving task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[68]  Jeffrey D. Pierce,et al.  Building An Innovation Community , 2011 .

[69]  M. Hoegl,et al.  Organizational knowledge creation and the generation of new product ideas: A behavioral approach , 2008 .

[70]  Brian A Vander Schee Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2009 .

[71]  D. Dahl,et al.  The Influence and Value of Analogical Thinking during New Product Ideation , 2002 .

[72]  Jeff Howe,et al.  Crowdsourcing: Why the Power of the Crowd Is Driving the Future of Business , 2008, Human Resource Management International Digest.

[73]  H. Barrett,et al.  Functional Fixedness in a Technologically Sparse Culture , 2005, Psychological science.

[74]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[75]  Peter R. Magnusson,et al.  Exploring the Contributions of Involving Ordinary Users in Ideation of Technology‐Based Services* , 2009 .

[76]  B. Nijstad,et al.  Relative accessibility of domain knowledge and creativity: The effects of knowledge activation on the quantity and originality of generated ideas , 2007 .

[77]  Yi Xu,et al.  Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[78]  G. Tellis,et al.  Research on Innovation: A Review and Agenda for Marketing Science , 2006 .

[79]  Betty Vandenbosch,et al.  Idea Management: A Systemic View , 2006 .

[80]  Paul Michael Di Gangi,et al.  Getting Customers' Ideas to Work for You: Learning from Dell how to Succeed with Online User Innovation Communities , 2010, MIS Q. Executive.

[81]  D. Simonton Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist , 2004 .

[82]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[83]  A. Bullinger,et al.  Community-Based Innovation Contests: Where Competition Meets Cooperation , 2010 .

[84]  Dean Keith Simonton,et al.  Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: the integration of product, person, and process perspectives. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[85]  T. Levitt,et al.  Creativity Is Not Enough , 2002 .

[86]  Wolfgang Stroebe,et al.  The selection of creative ideas after individual idea generation: choosing between creativity and impact. , 2010, British journal of psychology.

[87]  J. Füller Refining Virtual Co-Creation from a Consumer Perspective , 2010 .

[88]  T. B. Ward,et al.  The inadvertent use of prior knowledge in a generative cognitive task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[89]  B. Verspagen,et al.  The size distribution of innovations revisited: an application of extreme value statistics to citation and value measures of patent significance , 2007 .

[90]  G. Jouret Inside Cisco's Search for the Next Big Idea , 2009 .

[91]  M. Mumford,et al.  Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. , 1988 .

[92]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  International Conference on Information Systems ( ICIS ) 1-1-2009 Open Innovation : An Empirical Study of Online Contests , 2013 .

[93]  A. Cameron,et al.  Microeconometrics: Methods and Applications , 2005 .

[94]  Daniel J. Brass,et al.  Efficacy-Performing Spirals: A Multilevel Perspective , 1995 .

[95]  Lassi A. Liikkanen,et al.  Exposure Effects in Design Idea Generation: Unconscious Conformity or a Product of Sampling Probability? , 2006 .

[96]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive stimulation in brainstorming. , 2000, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[97]  C. Shalley,et al.  The Effects of Personal and Contextual Characteristics on Creativity: Where Should We Go from Here? , 2004 .

[98]  David Glen Mick,et al.  Toward a Psychology of Consumer Creativity , 2008 .

[99]  Jonathan Cagan,et al.  A Study of Design Fixation, Its Mitigation and Perception in Engineering Design Faculty , 2010 .

[100]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  The top five reasons for lurking: improving community experiences for everyone , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[101]  J. Guilford,et al.  The nature of human intelligence. , 1968 .