The Truth Before and After: Brain Potentials Reveal Automatic Activation of Event Knowledge during Sentence Comprehension
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al. Event structure in perception and conception. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.
[2] Heather J. Ferguson,et al. Eye movements reveal rapid concurrent access to factual and counterfactual interpretations of the world , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[3] Pamela Coker. Syntactic and semantic factors in the acquisition of before and after , 1978, Journal of Child Language.
[4] J. Mandler. On the comprehension of temporal order , 1986 .
[5] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. If the real world were irrelevant, so to speak: The role of propositional truth-value in counterfactual sentence comprehension , 2012, Cognition.
[6] Marta Kutas,et al. Quantifiers more or less quantify online: ERP evidence for partial incremental interpretation. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[7] Salim Roukos,et al. Brain potentials related to stages of sentence verification. , 1983, Psychophysiology.
[8] P. Gordon,et al. The interplay of discourse congruence and lexical association during sentence processing: Evidence from ERPs and eye tracking. , 2007, Journal of memory and language.
[9] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials , 2016 .
[10] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. “Who’s he?” Event-related brain potentials and unbound pronouns , 2014 .
[11] David I. Beaver,et al. A Uniform Analysis of 'Before' and 'After' , 2003 .
[12] Gerry T. M. Altmann,et al. Anticipating the garden path: The horse raced past the barn ate the cake , 2013 .
[13] B. Mohammadi,et al. Impaired comprehension of temporal connectives in Parkinson’s disease—A neuroimaging study , 2012, Neuropsychologia.
[14] Sabine Guéraud,et al. What Have We Been Missing? The Role of General World Knowledge in Discourse Processing , 2005 .
[15] Marta Kutas,et al. Verb aspect and the activation of event knowledge. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[16] Edward J. O'Brien,et al. Knowledge Activation, Integration, and Validation During Narrative Text Comprehension , 2014 .
[17] A. Reboul,et al. The logical status of fictional discourse: what Searle’s speaker can’t say to his hearer , 1990 .
[18] Peter Aldhous,et al. Before and after , 2002, Nature.
[19] Nicholas C. Hindy,et al. A cortical network for the encoding of object change. , 2015, Cerebral cortex.
[20] M. Kutas,et al. Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.
[21] Van Berkum,et al. The neuropragmatics of 'simple' utterance comprehension: An ERP review , 2009 .
[22] Ken McRae,et al. People Use their Knowledge of Common Events to Understand Language, and Do So as Quickly as Possible , 2009, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[23] Marta Kutas,et al. When temporal terms belie conceptual order , 1998, Nature.
[24] E. Moreno,et al. Tell me sweet little lies: An event-related potentials study on the processing of social lies , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[25] J. Kounios,et al. Structure and process in semantic memory: evidence from event-related brain potentials and reaction times. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[26] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Quantification, Prediction, and the Online Impact of Sentence Truth-Value: Evidence From Event-Related Potentials , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[27] Dorothee J. Chwilla,et al. When Heuristics Clash with Parsing Routines: ERP Evidence for Conflict Monitoring in Sentence Perception , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[28] Marta Kutas,et al. Rearranging the world: Neural network supporting the processing of temporal connectives , 2012, NeuroImage.
[29] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.
[30] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Time in narrative comprehension , 2001 .
[31] Herbert H. Clark,et al. On the process of comparing sentences against pictures , 1972 .
[32] Sharon L. Thompson-Schill,et al. The Effect of Object State-Changes on Event Processing: Do Objects Compete with Themselves? , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[33] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Thirty years and counting: finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). , 2011, Annual review of psychology.
[34] M. Just,et al. From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1992 A capacity theory of comprehension : Individual differences in working memory , 2017 .
[35] D. Rapp. How do readers handle incorrect information during reading? , 2008, Memory & cognition.
[36] Hartmut Fitz,et al. Getting real about Semantic Illusions: Rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension , 2012, Brain Research.
[37] Time is of the Essence: Processing Temporal Connectives During Reading , 2005 .
[38] Tobias Richter,et al. Does Validation During Language Comprehension Depend on an Evaluative Mindset? , 2014 .
[39] Alex Lascarides,et al. Temporal Connectives in a Discourse Context , 1993, EACL.
[40] David R. Dowty. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: semantics or pragmatics? , 1986, The Language of Time - A Reader.
[41] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[42] M. Kutas,et al. Who Did What and When? Using Word- and Clause-Level ERPs to Monitor Working Memory Usage in Reading , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[43] A. Trosborg,et al. Children's comprehension of ‘before’ and ‘after’ reinvestigated , 1982, Journal of Child Language.
[44] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[45] W. Kintsch. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension : a construction-integration model , 1991 .
[46] Kenneth Hugdahl,et al. A Standard Computerized Version of the Reading Span Test in Different Languages , 2008 .
[47] Stephanie Kelter,et al. Comprehending narratives containing flashbacks: evidence for temporally organized representations. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[48] Jason Bohan,et al. Anomalies at the Borderline of Awareness: An ERP Study , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[49] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Individual differences and contextual bias in pronoun resolution: Evidence from ERPs , 2006, Brain Research.
[50] Richard J. Gerrig,et al. The Scope of Memory-Based Processing , 2005 .
[51] E. Clark. On the acquisition of the meaning of before and after , 1971 .
[52] David J. Therriault,et al. Processing and Representing Temporal Information in Narrative Text , 2007 .
[53] Peter Hagoort,et al. Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[54] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Pragmatic skills predict online counterfactual comprehension: Evidence from the N400 , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.
[55] Ronghua Wang,et al. Language and Time: A Cognitive Linguistics Approach* , 2015 .
[56] J. Elman,et al. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[57] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary semantic change deafness in discourse comprehension. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[58] Todd R. Ferretti,et al. Grammatical aspect, lexical aspect, and event duration constrain the availability of events in narratives , 2013, Cognition.
[59] G. Altmann,et al. Knowing what, where, and when: Event comprehension in language processing , 2014, Cognition.
[60] Giosuè Baggio,et al. Computing and recomputing discourse models : An ERP study , 2008 .
[61] L. Aravind,et al. Integration of Word Meaning and World Knowledge in Language Comprehension , 2022 .
[62] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. “If a lion could speak …”: Online sensitivity to propositional truth-value of unrealistic counterfactual sentences , 2013 .
[63] J. Elman,et al. Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[64] C. Van Petten,et al. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[65] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When the Truth Is Not Too Hard to Handle , 2008, Psychological science.
[66] Murray Singer,et al. Validation in Reading Comprehension , 2013 .
[67] Mike Rinck,et al. Processing of temporal information: Evidence from eye movements , 2003, Memory & cognition.
[68] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Testing the limits of the semantic illusion phenomenon: ERPs reveal temporary change deafness in discourse comprehension , 2004 .
[69] Giosuè Baggio,et al. Language, linguistics and cognition , 2012 .
[70] A. Hähnel,et al. Using temporal information to construct, update, and retrieve situation models of narratives. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[71] Evelyn C. Ferstl,et al. Emotional and Temporal Aspects of Situation Model Processing during Text Comprehension: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[72] Giosuè Baggio,et al. Logic as Marr's Computational Level: Four Case Studies , 2015, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[73] Jelena Mirkovic,et al. Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing , 2009, Cogn. Sci..