Perceptual switch rates with ambiguous structure-from-motion figures in bipolar disorder

Slowing of the rate at which a rivalrous percept switches from one configuration to another has been suggested as a potential trait marker for bipolar disorder. We measured perceptual alternations for a bistable, rotating, structure-from-motion cylinder in bipolar and control participants. In a control task, binocular depth rendered the direction of cylinder rotation unambiguous to monitor participants' performance and attention during the experimental task. A particular direction of rotation was perceptually stable, on average, for 33.5 s in participants without psychiatric diagnosis. Euthymic, bipolar participants showed a slightly slower rate of switching between the two percepts (percept duration 42.3 s). Under a parametric analysis of the best-fitting model for individual participants, this difference was statistically significant. However, the variability within groups was high, so this difference in average switch rates was not big enough to serve as a trait marker for bipolar disorder. We also found that low-level visual capacities, such as stereo threshold, influence perceptual switch rates. We suggest that there is no single brain location responsible for perceptual switching in all different ambiguous figures and that perceptual switching is generated by the actions of local cortical circuitry.

[1]  A. Parker,et al.  Comparing perceptual signals of single V5/MT neurons in two binocular depth tasks. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  R. Blake,et al.  On the perceptual identity of dynamic stereopsis and kinetic depth , 1993, Vision Research.

[3]  Charles Wheatstone.  On some remarkable and hitherto unobserved phenomena of binocular vision. , 1962 .

[4]  J. Pettigrew.  Searching for the Switch: Neural Bases for Perceptual Rivalry Alternations , 2001 .

[5]  N. Logothetis,et al.  What is rivalling during binocular rivalry , 1996 .

[6]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  Plaid Motion Rivalry: Correlates with Binocular Rivalry and Positive Mood State , 2006, Perception.

[7]  H. Wallach,et al.  The kinetic depth effect. , 1953, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  C. Zaroff,et al.  Variation in stereoacuity: normative description, fixation disparity, and the roles of aging and gender. , 2003, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[10]  Sabine Windmann,et al.  Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Attentional Control over Bistable Vision , 2006 .

[11]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A Common Oscillator for Perceptual Rivalries? , 2003, Perception.

[12]  Colin Renfrew,et al.  Carbon 14 and the Prehistory of Europe , 1971 .

[13]  W. Levelt.  On binocular rivalry , 1965 .

[14]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Visual Motion Retards Alternations between Conflicting Perceptual Interpretations , 2003, Neuron.

[15]  F. Attneave.  Multistability in perception. , 1971, Scientific American.

[16]  M. Lankheet,et al.  Unraveling adaptation and mutual inhibition in perceptual rivalry. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[17]  R. Andersen,et al.  Encoding of three-dimensional structure-from-motion by primate area MT neurons , 1998, Nature.

[18]  C. Wheatstone.  XVIII. Contributions to the physiology of vision. —Part the first. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, phenomena of binocular vision , 1962, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[19]  R. van Ee,et al.  Visual Cortex Allows Prediction of Perceptual States during Ambiguous Structure-From-Motion , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  M. Hamilton.  A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION , 1960, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[21]  R. Wilfred George,et al.  The Significance of the Fluctuations Experienced in Observing Ambiguous Figures and in Binocular Rivalry , 1936 .

[22]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Interocular suppression in the primary visual cortex: a possible neural basis of binocular rivalry , 1995, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Blake,et al.  The interplay between stereopsis and structure from motion , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Guilford,et al.  Fluctuation of an ambiguous figure in dementia praecox and in manic-depressive patients. , 1933 .

[25]  I Rock,et al.  Further Evidence of Failure of Reversal of Ambiguous Figures by Uninformed Subjects , 1992, Perception.

[26]  C. Clifford.  Binocular rivalry , 2009, Current Biology.

[27]  Philipp Sterzer,et al.  A neural basis for inference in perceptual ambiguity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Kung Yao,et al.  Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  G. Brouwer,et al.  Endogenous influences on perceptual bistability depend on exogenous stimulus characteristics , 2006, Vision Research.

[30]  N. Rubin,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability : plaids and binocular rivalry compared , 2003 .

[31]  Stephan Riek,et al.  Interhemispheric switching mediates perceptual rivalry , 2000, Current Biology.

[32]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Dynamics of perceptual bi-stability for stereoscopic slant rivalry and a comparison with grating, house-face, and Necker cube rivalry , 2005, Vision Research.

[33]  A. Beck,et al.  An inventory for measuring depression. , 1961, Archives of general psychiatry.

[34]  André J. Noest,et al.  Attentional control over either of the two competing percepts of ambiguous stimuli revealed by a two-parameter analysis: Means do not make the difference , 2006, Vision Research.

[35]  A. Parker,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms for the perception of ambiguous stimuli , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[36]  K. Ukai,et al.  Binocular Rivalry Alternation Rate Declines with Age , 2003, Perceptual and motor skills.

[37]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neuronal correlates of subjective visual perception. , 1989, Science.

[38]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Visual competition , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  A. Parker,et al.  Perceptually Bistable Three-Dimensional Figures Evoke High Choice Probabilities in Cortical Area MT , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry , 1996, Nature.

[41]  Steven Mark Miller,et al.  Slow binocular rivalry in bipolar disorder , 2003, Psychological Medicine.

[42]  Randolph Blake,et al.  Traveling waves of activity in primary visual cortex during binocular rivalry , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[43]  J. Pettigrew,et al.  A ‘sticky’ interhemispheric switch in bipolar disorder? , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[44]  R. Leeper.  A Study of a Neglected Portion of the Field of Learning—the Development of Sensory Organization , 1935 .

[45]  D. Heeger,et al.  Neuronal activity in human primary visual cortex correlates with perception during binocular rivalry , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[46]  Raymond van Ee,et al.  Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception. , 2005, Journal of vision.

[47]  H. Wilson,et al.  Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception , 2001, Nature.

[48]  A. Borsellino,et al.  Reversal time distribution in the perception of visual ambiguous stimuli , 1972, Kybernetik.

[49]  Stefan Treue,et al.  Human perception of structure from motion , 1991, Vision Research.

[50]  F. Tong,et al.  Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[51]  R. C. Young,et al.  A Rating Scale for Mania: Reliability, Validity and Sensitivity , 1978, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[52]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus , 2005, Nature.