Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control.

This paper reports on the design and evaluation of in-car displays used to support Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control. Stop & Go Adaptive Cruise Control is an extension of Adaptive Cruise Control, as it is able to bring the vehicle to a complete stop. Previous versions of Adaptive Cruise Control have only operated above 26 kph. The greatest concern for these technologies is the appropriateness of the driver's response in any given scenario. Three different driver interfaces were proposed to support the detection of modal, spatial and temporal changes of the system: an iconic display, a flashing iconic display, and a representation of the radar. The results show that drivers correctly identified more changes detected by the system with the radar display than with the other displays, but higher levels of workload accompanied this increased detection.

[1]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[2]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Drive-by-wire: The case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control , 1997 .

[3]  Marika Hoedemaeker,et al.  Driving with a Congestion Assistant; mental workload and acceptance. , 2009, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  B. Thomas,et al.  Usability Evaluation In Industry , 1996 .

[5]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Vehicle automation and driving performance , 1998 .

[6]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Attention and automation: New perspectives on mental underload and performance , 2002 .

[7]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  An on-road investigation of vehicle feedback and its role in driver cognition: Implications for cognitive ergonomics , 2001 .

[8]  D. Norman Categorization of action slips. , 1981 .

[9]  Mats Wiklund,et al.  The long-term effect of Intelligent Speed Adaptation on driver behaviour. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[10]  Richard S. Jensen,et al.  The Boundaries of Aviation Psychology, Human Factors, Aeronautical Decision Making, Situation Awareness, and Crew Resource Management , 1997 .

[11]  N A Stanton,et al.  Behavioural compensation by drivers of a simulator when using a vision enhancement system , 2000, Ergonomics.

[12]  Rahul Sukthankar Situation awareness in tactical driving: the role of simulation tools , 1997 .

[13]  E. N. Corlett,et al.  Evaluation of human work : a practical ergonomics methodology , 1991 .

[14]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[15]  Mark S. Young,et al.  Malleable Attentional Resources Theory: A New Explanation for the Effects of Mental Underload on Performance , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[16]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Designing for Situation Awareness : An Approach to User-Centered Design , 2003 .

[17]  James P Bliss,et al.  Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[18]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Verbal Protocol Analysis , 2004, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[19]  Denis Besnard,et al.  Cognitive mismatches in the cockpit: will they ever be a thing of the past? , 2007, Applied ergonomics.

[20]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control , 2005, Ergonomics.

[21]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[22]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[23]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload , 2004, Ergonomics.

[24]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: Safety implications of automation in vehicles , 1996 .

[25]  Karel Brookhuis,et al.  Handbook of Human Factors and Ergonomics Methods , 2009 .

[26]  John Piggott,et al.  Situational awareness and safety , 2001 .

[27]  J. G. Hollands,et al.  Engineering Psychology and Human Performance , 1984 .

[28]  Neville Stanton,et al.  Situation awareness measurement: a review of applicability for C4i environments. , 2006, Applied ergonomics.

[29]  A Sebok,et al.  Team performance in process control: influences of interface design and staffing levels , 2000, Ergonomics.

[30]  W. Karwowski International encyclopedia of ergonomics and human factors , 2001 .

[31]  James Reason,et al.  Human Error , 1990 .

[32]  D A Norman,et al.  The 'problem' with automation: inappropriate feedback and interaction, not 'over-automation'. , 1990, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[33]  Young,et al.  Out of Control , 1996 .

[34]  Kip Smith,et al.  Situation Awareness Is Adaptive, Externally Directed Consciousness , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[35]  D. Woods Coping with complexity: the psychology of human behaviour in complex systems , 1988 .

[36]  Peter M. Knoll,et al.  Milestones on the way to a reconfigurable automotive instrument cluster , 2002, Liquid Crystals.

[37]  David Woods,et al.  Behind human error : cognitive systems, computers, and hindsight : state-of-the-art report , 1994 .

[38]  Steven J. Landry,et al.  Introduction to Human Factors and Ergonomics for Engineers , 2007 .

[39]  N A Stanton,et al.  What's skill got to do with it? Vehicle automation and driver mental workload , 2007, Ergonomics.

[40]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Distributed Situation Awareness: Theory, Measurement and Application to Teamwork , 2009 .

[41]  Bobbie D. Seppelt,et al.  Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  The psychology of driving automation: a discussion with Professor Don Norman , 2007 .

[43]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  The ironies of vehicle feedback in car design , 2006, Ergonomics.

[44]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  AUTOMATING THE DRIVER'S CONTROL TASKS , 2001 .

[45]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[46]  Henning Andersen,et al.  Tasks, errors, and mental models , 1988 .

[47]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things that make us smart , 1979 .

[48]  David B. Kaber,et al.  Situation awareness and workload in driving while using adaptive cruise control and a cell phone , 2005 .

[49]  Mark S. Young,et al.  A proposed psychological model of driving automation , 2000 .

[50]  J. B. Brooke,et al.  SUS: A 'Quick and Dirty' Usability Scale , 1996 .