Information use in foraging flocks of songbirds: no evidence for social transmission of patch quality

[1]  D. Farine,et al.  Information use in foraging flocks of songbirds - no evidence for social transmission of patch quality , 2019, bioRxiv.

[2]  Florian Hartig,et al.  The multi-dimensional nature of information drives prioritization of private over social information in ants , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[3]  D. Farine,et al.  Wild songbirds exhibit consistent individual differences in inter-specific social behaviour , 2019, bioRxiv.

[4]  D. Farine,et al.  Diurnal variation in the production of vocal information about food supports a model of social adjustment in wild songbirds , 2019, Proceedings of the Royal Society B.

[5]  J. Mappes,et al.  Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey , 2018, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[6]  Richard McElreath,et al.  Conformity does not perpetuate suboptimal traditions in a wild population of songbirds , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Julie Morand-Ferron,et al.  Individual and ecological determinants of social information transmission in the wild , 2017, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  Z. Tóth,et al.  The effect of social connections on the discovery of multiple hidden food patches in a bird species , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[9]  Andrew J. J. MacIntosh,et al.  Social Information Transmission in Animals: Lessons from Studies of Diffusion , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[10]  D. Farine,et al.  Pathways of information transmission among wild songbirds follow experimentally imposed changes in social foraging structure , 2016, Biology Letters.

[11]  D. Grünbaum,et al.  Effectiveness of social information used by seabirds searching for unpredictable and ephemeral prey , 2016 .

[12]  A. Thornton,et al.  Counting conformity: evaluating the units of information in frequency-dependent social learning , 2015, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Inferring social structure from temporal data , 2015, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[14]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  The role of social and ecological processes in structuring animal populations: a case study from automated tracking of wild birds , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[15]  William Hoppitt,et al.  Interspecific social networks promote information transmission in wild songbirds , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  A. Thornton,et al.  Experimentally induced innovations lead to persistent culture via conformity in wild birds , 2014, Nature.

[17]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Collective decision making and social interaction rules in mixed-species flocks of songbirds , 2014, Animal Behaviour.

[18]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Individual-level personality influences social foraging and collective behaviour in wild birds , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[19]  L. Chittka,et al.  Bumblebees (Bombus terrestris) use social information as an indicator of safety in dangerous environments , 2014, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[20]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[21]  Damien R. Farine,et al.  Animal social network inference and permutations for ecologists in R using asnipe , 2013 .

[22]  L. Aplin,et al.  Milk bottles revisited: social learning and individual variation in the blue tit, Cyanistes caeruleus , 2013, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  E. van de Waal,et al.  Potent Social Learning and Conformity Shape a Wild Primate’s Foraging Decisions , 2013, Science.

[24]  I. Couzin,et al.  Emergent Sensing of Complex Environments by Mobile Animal Groups , 2013, Science.

[25]  K. Laland,et al.  Environmental Complexity Influences Association Network Structure and Network-Based Diffusion of Foraging Information in Fish Shoals , 2013, The American Naturalist.

[26]  Iead Rezek,et al.  Inferring social network structure in ecological systems from spatio-temporal data streams , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[27]  D. Farine,et al.  Social network analysis of mixed-species flocks: exploring the structure and evolution of interspecific social behaviour , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[28]  D. Farine,et al.  Social networks predict patch discovery in a wild population of songbirds , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[29]  K. Laland,et al.  Information flow through threespine stickleback networks without social transmission , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[30]  Kevin N Laland,et al.  Detecting social transmission in networks. , 2010, Journal of theoretical biology.

[31]  Sasha R. X. Dall,et al.  The ecology of information: an overview on the ecological significance of making informed decisions , 2010 .

[32]  Charles L Nunn,et al.  Network-based diffusion analysis: a new method for detecting social learning , 2009, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  B. Galef,et al.  Chapter 4 Strategies for Social Learning , 2009 .

[34]  E. Danchin,et al.  Inadvertent social information in foraging bumblebees: effects of flower distribution and implications for pollination , 2008, Animal Behaviour.

[35]  I. Coolen,et al.  Trade‐Offs in the Adaptive Use of Social and Asocial Learning , 2005 .

[36]  T. Valone,et al.  Public Information: From Nosy Neighbors to Cultural Evolution , 2004, Science.

[37]  Kevin N. Laland,et al.  The role of conformity in foraging when personal and social information conflict , 2004 .

[38]  I. Coolen,et al.  Species difference in adaptive use of public information in sticklebacks , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[39]  Thomas J Valone,et al.  Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[40]  P. Sherman,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary traps. , 2002 .

[41]  G. Ruxton,et al.  Patch choice decisions of wild blackbirds: the role of preharvest public information , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[42]  L. Giraldeau,et al.  Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions , 2001, Animal Behaviour.

[43]  Craig W. Benkman,et al.  The use and misuse of public information by foraging red crossbills , 1999 .

[44]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  Heterospecific attraction and food resources in migrants' breeding patch selection in northern boreal forest , 1998, Oecologia.

[45]  Dorothy M. Fragaszy,et al.  On the relation between social dynamics and social learning , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[46]  Jennifer J. Templeton,et al.  Patch assessment in foraging flocks of European starlings: evidence for the use of public information , 1995 .

[47]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Back to the basics of anti-predatory vigilance: the group-size effect , 1995, Animal Behaviour.

[48]  E. Ranta,et al.  Competition Versus Cooperation: Success of Individuals Foraging Alone and in Groups , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[49]  C. Clark,et al.  The evolutionary advantages of group foraging , 1986 .

[50]  L. Sasvári.  Observational learning in great, blue and marsh tits , 1979, Animal Behaviour.

[51]  R. Hinde,et al.  Behaviour of the great tit (Parus major) and some other related species , 1952 .