Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment: implications of SAMHSA's SBIRT initiative for substance abuse policy and practice

AIMS This paper describes the major findings and public health implications of a cross-site evaluation of a national Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) demonstration program funded by the US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). METHODS Eleven multi-site programs in two cohorts of SAMHSA grant recipients were each funded for 5 years to promote the adoption and sustained implementation of SBIRT. The SBIRT cross-site evaluation used a multi-method evaluation design to provide comprehensive information on the processes, outcomes and costs of SBIRT as implemented in a variety of medical and community settings. FINDINGS SBIRT programs in the two evaluated SAMHSA cohorts screened more than 1 million patients/clients. SBIRT implementation was facilitated by committed leadership and the use of substance use specialists, rather than medical generalists, to deliver services. Although the quasi-experimental nature of the outcome evaluation does not permit causal inferences, pre-post differences were clinically meaningful and statistically significant for almost every measure of substance use. Greater intervention intensity was associated with larger decreases in substance use. Both brief intervention and brief treatment were associated with positive outcomes, but brief intervention was more cost-effective for most substances. Sixty-nine (67%) of the original performance sites adapted and redesigned SBIRT service delivery after initial grant funding ended. Four factors influenced SBIRT sustainability: presence of program champions, availability of funding, systemic change and effective management of SBIRT provider challenges. CONCLUSIONS The US Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration's Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) demonstration program was adapted successfully to the needs of early identification efforts for hazardous use of alcohol and illicit drugs. SBIRT is an innovative way to integrate the management of substance use disorders into primary care and general medicine. Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment implementation was associated with improvements in treatment system equity, efficiency and economy.

[1]  F. Beyer,et al.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. , 2018, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[2]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment (SBIRT): implementation barriers, facilitators and model migration , 2017, Addiction.

[3]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Development of the SBIRT checklist for observation in real‐time (SCORe) , 2017, Addiction.

[4]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Sustaining Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) services in health‐care settings , 2017, Addiction.

[5]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  The cost‐effectiveness of brief intervention versus brief treatment of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) in the United States , 2017, Addiction.

[6]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  The relative impact of brief treatment versus brief intervention in primary health‐care screening programs for substance use disorders , 2017, Addiction.

[7]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  The SBIRT program matrix: a conceptual framework for program implementation and evaluation , 2017, Addiction.

[8]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  A time and motion study of Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment implementation in health‐care settings , 2017, Addiction.

[9]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT): rationale, program overview and cross‐site evaluation , 2017, Addiction.

[10]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  The influence of state‐level policy environments on the activation of the Medicaid SBIRT reimbursement codes , 2017, Addiction.

[11]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Substance use outcomes of patients served by a large US implementation of Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) , 2017, Addiction.

[12]  F. D. Del Boca,et al.  Sustaining SBIRT in the wild: simulating revenues and costs for Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment programs , 2017, Addiction.

[13]  D. Morisano,et al.  Infrastructure and Career Opportunities in Addiction Science : The Emergence of an Interdisciplinary Field , 2017 .

[14]  J. Borus,et al.  Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment. , 2016, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[15]  T. Babor,et al.  The Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): A review of graded severity algorithms and national adaptations , 2016, International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research.

[16]  L. García-Ortíz,et al.  Effectiveness of brief interventions in primary health care settings to decrease alcohol consumption by adult non-dependent drinkers: a systematic review of systematic reviews. , 2015, Preventive medicine.

[17]  J. Ungemack,et al.  Substance‐Related Disorders: Alcohol‐Related Disorders , 2015 .

[18]  R. Peto,et al.  Global effects of smoking, of quitting, and of taxing tobacco. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  N. Heather,et al.  Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care ( SIPS trial ) : pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial , 2013 .

[20]  H. W. Clark,et al.  Screening, brief interventions, referral to treatment (SBIRT) for illicit drug and alcohol use at multiple healthcare sites: comparison at intake and 6 months later. , 2009, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[21]  M. Souza-Formigoni,et al.  Implementation of alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care units in two Brazilian states: a case study , 2008 .

[22]  T. Babor,et al.  Evaluation of a training program to implement alcohol screening, brief intervention and referral to treatment in primary health care in Minas Gerais, Brazil , 2008 .

[23]  S. Barfod.  BA GP's reflections on brief intervention in primary health care in Denmark , 2008 .

[24]  E. F. Furtado,et al.  Implementing brief interventions for alcohol problems in the public health system in the region of Ribeirão Preto, Brazil: evaluation of the PAI-PAD training model , 2008 .

[25]  O. Aasland,et al.  Screening and brief intervention for alcohol problems in Norway. Not a big hit among general practitioners , 2008 .

[26]  F. Spak,et al.  Large Scale Implementation of Early Identification and Brief Intervention in Swedish Primary Health Care – will it be Successful? , 2008 .

[27]  K. Stenius,et al.  Alcohol and drug treatment systems in public health perspective: mediators and moderators of population effects , 2008, International journal of methods in psychiatric research.

[28]  T. Babor.  Regression to the mean: elephant in the living room or the delusions of a Swedish student ‘out bicycling’? , 2008 .

[29]  T. Babor,et al.  Screening, Brief Intervention, and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) , 2007, Substance abuse.

[30]  N. Heather,et al.  Effectiveness of brief alcohol interventions in primary care populations. , 2007, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[31]  W. Miller,et al.  Motivating young adults for treatment and lifestyle change. , 1994 .

[32]  O. Aasland,et al.  Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption--II. , 1993, Addiction.

[33]  E. Jellinek,et al.  The Disease Concept of Alcoholism , 1961, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[34]  D. Ore,et al.  The disease concept of alcoholism. , 1985, Illinois dental journal.