On the functional diversity of dynamical behaviour in genetic and metabolic feedback systems

BackgroundFeedback regulation plays crucial roles in the robust control and maintenance of many cellular systems. Negative feedbacks are found to underline both stable and unstable, often oscillatory, behaviours. We explore the dynamical characteristics of systems with single as well as coupled negative feedback loops using a combined approach of analytical and numerical techniques. Particularly, we emphasise how the loop's characterising factors (strength and cooperativity levels) affect system dynamics and how individual loops interact in the coupled-loop systems.ResultsWe develop an analytical bifurcation analysis based on the stability and the Routh- Hurwitz theorem for a common negative feedback system and a variety of its variants. We demonstrate that different combinations of the feedback strengths of individual loops give rise to different dynamical behaviours. Moreover, incorporating more negative feedback loops always tend to enhance system stability. We show that two mechanisms, in addition to the lengthening of pathway, can lower the Hill coefficient to a biologically plausible level required for sustained oscillations. These include loops coupling and end-product utilisation. We find that the degradation rates solely affect the threshold Hill coefficient for sustained oscillation, while the synthesis rates have more significant roles in determining the threshold feedback strength. Unbalancing the degradation rates between the system species is found as a way to improve stability.ConclusionThe analytical methods and insights presented in this study demonstrate that reallocation of the feedback loop may or may not make the system more stable; the specific effect is determined by the degradation rates of the newly inhibited molecular species. As the loop moves closer to the end of the pathway, the minimum Hill coefficient for oscillation is reduced. Furthermore, under general (unequal) values of the degradation rates, system extension becomes more stable only when the added species degrades slower than it is being produced; otherwise the system is more prone to oscillation. The coupling of loops significantly increases the richness of dynamical bifurcation characteristics. The likelihood of having oscillatory behaviour is directly determined by the loops' strength: stronger loops always result in smaller oscillatory regions.

[1]  D A Fell,et al.  Control of the threonine-synthesis pathway in Escherichia coli: a theoretical and experimental approach. , 2001, The Biochemical journal.

[2]  Francis J Doyle,et al.  Multiple feedback loop design in the tryptophan regulatory network of Escherichia coli suggests a paradigm for robust regulation of processes in series , 2006, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[3]  R. D. Bliss,et al.  Reconsideration of the theory of oscillatory repression. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[4]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Sustained oscillations and time delays in gene expression of protein Hes1 , 2003, FEBS letters.

[5]  J. Tyson Periodic enzyme synthesis and oscillatory repression: why is the period of oscillation close to the cell cycle time? , 1983, Journal of theoretical biology.

[6]  B. Goodwin Oscillatory behavior in enzymatic control processes. , 1965, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[7]  J. Mandelstam,et al.  Biochemistry of bacterial growth , 1968 .

[8]  H. Kitano Towards a theory of biological robustness , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  Hiroshi Momiji,et al.  Dissecting the dynamics of the Hes1 genetic oscillator. , 2008, Journal of theoretical biology.

[10]  J H Parish Biochemistry of Bacterial Growth, 3rd Edition: Edited by J Mandelstam, K McQuillen and I Dawes. pp 449. Blackwell Scientific Publications. Oxford. £28.00 or £15.50 (pbk) ISBN 0-632-00323-5 and ISBN 0-632-00596-3 , 1985 .

[11]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Dynamics of a minimal model of interlocked positive and negative feedback loops of transcriptional regulation by cAMP-response element binding proteins. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[12]  R. Ramaswamy,et al.  Complex behaviour of the repressible operon. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  Johannes Müller,et al.  Modeling the Hes1 Oscillator , 2007, J. Comput. Biol..

[14]  M Schnarr,et al.  DNA binding properties of the LexA repressor. , 1991, Biochimie.

[15]  Benjamin L Turner,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S3 Table S1 References Robust, Tunable Biological Oscillations from Interlinked Positive and Negative Feedback Loops , 2022 .

[16]  C. Yanofsky,et al.  The different roles of tryptophan transfer RNA in regulating trp operon expression in E. coli versus B. subtilis. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[17]  Y. Hiromi,et al.  Cell‐type specific utilization of multiple negative feedback loops generates developmental constancy , 2005, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[18]  M C Mackey,et al.  Dynamic regulation of the tryptophan operon: a modeling study and comparison with experimental data. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  John J. Tyson,et al.  The Dynamics of Feedback Control Circuits in Biochemical Pathways , 1978 .

[20]  Lee A. Segel,et al.  Mathematical models in molecular and cellular biology , 1982, The Mathematical Gazette.

[21]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Oscillations in cell biology. , 2005, Current opinion in cell biology.

[22]  M. Freeman Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development , 2000, Nature.

[23]  Ryoichiro Kageyama,et al.  The Hes gene family: repressors and oscillators that orchestrate embryogenesis , 2007, Development.

[24]  O. Pourquié,et al.  Vertebrate somitogenesis. , 2001, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[25]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The IkappaB-NF-kappaB signaling module: temporal control and selective gene activation. , 2002, Science.

[26]  R. D. Bliss,et al.  Role of feedback inhibition in stabilizing the classical operon. , 1982, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  H. Sauro,et al.  Quantitative analysis of signaling networks. , 2004, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[28]  H. Hirata,et al.  Oscillatory Expression of the bHLH Factor Hes1 Regulated by a Negative Feedback Loop , 2002, Science.

[29]  A. Hoffmann,et al.  The I (cid:1) B –NF-(cid:1) B Signaling Module: Temporal Control and Selective Gene Activation , 2022 .

[30]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Modeling the molecular regulatory mechanism of circadian rhythms in Drosophila. , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[31]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Biochemical Oscillations And Cellular Rhythms: Contents , 1996 .

[32]  N. Macdonald,et al.  Time lag in a model of a biochemical reaction sequence with end product inhibition. , 1977, Journal of theoretical biology.

[33]  Subodh B. Rawool,et al.  Dynamic model of Escherichia coli tryptophan operon shows an optimal structural design. , 2003, European journal of biochemistry.

[34]  I. S. Gradshteyn,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1976 .

[35]  R Thomas,et al.  Dynamical behaviour of biological regulatory networks--I. Biological role of feedback loops and practical use of the concept of the loop-characteristic state. , 1995, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[36]  D. A. Baxter,et al.  Mathematical Modeling of Gene Networks , 2000, Neuron.

[37]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Structural kinetic modeling of metabolic networks , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  A. Levine,et al.  The p53-mdm-2 autoregulatory feedback loop. , 1993, Genes & development.

[39]  J. Griffith,et al.  Mathematics of cellular control processes. I. Negative feedback to one gene. , 1968, Journal of theoretical biology.

[40]  E B Klerman,et al.  Commentary: Model Building, Quantitative Testing, and Model Comparison , 1999, Journal of biological rhythms.

[41]  Y. Tao,et al.  Stochastic fluctuations in gene expression far from equilibrium: Omega expansion and linear noise approximation. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[42]  D. F. Hays,et al.  Table of Integrals, Series, and Products , 1966 .

[43]  Kwang-Hyun Cho,et al.  Coupled feedback loops form dynamic motifs of cellular networks. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[44]  R. Kageyama,et al.  Structure, chromosomal locus, and promoter analysis of the gene encoding the mouse helix-loop-helix factor HES-1. Negative autoregulation through the multiple N box elements. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[45]  Lan K. Nguyen,et al.  On Multiple Regulatory Mechanisms in the Tryptophan Operon System in Escherichia coli: In silico Study of Perturbation Dynamics , 2008, Silico Biol..

[46]  S. Samarasinghe,et al.  A Review of Systems Biology Perspective on Genetic Regulatory Networks with Examples , 2008 .

[47]  N. Monk Oscillatory Expression of Hes1, p53, and NF-κB Driven by Transcriptional Time Delays , 2003, Current Biology.

[48]  C. Johnson,et al.  Expression of a gene cluster kaiABC as a circadian feedback process in cyanobacteria. , 1998, Science.

[49]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Living with noisy genes: how cells function reliably with inherent variability in gene expression. , 2007, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[50]  A. Goldbeter A model for circadian oscillations in the Drosophila period protein (PER) , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  C. Yanofsky Using Studies on Tryptophan Metabolism to Answer Basic Biological Questions , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.