Knowledge-based potentials in protein design.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Woolfson. The design of coiled-coil structures and assemblies. , 2005, Advances in protein chemistry.
[2] S. A. Marshall,et al. Achieving stability and conformational specificity in designed proteins via binary patterning. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[3] L. Looger,et al. Computational design of receptor and sensor proteins with novel functions , 2003, Nature.
[4] Ned S Wingreen,et al. Fast accurate evaluation of protein solvent exposure , 2004, Proteins.
[5] R. Ranganathan,et al. Evolutionarily conserved pathways of energetic connectivity in protein families. , 1999, Science.
[6] Loren L Looger,et al. Computational Design of a Biologically Active Enzyme , 2004, Science.
[7] W. Atchley,et al. Correlations among amino acid sites in bHLH protein domains: an information theoretic analysis. , 2000, Molecular biology and evolution.
[8] Roland L. Dunbrack. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.
[9] L. H. Bradley,et al. Protein design by binary patterning of polar and nonpolar amino acids. , 1993, Methods in molecular biology.
[10] D. Thirumalai,et al. Determination of network of residues that regulate allostery in protein families using sequence analysis , 2006, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[11] M. Donoghue,et al. Recreating a functional ancestral archosaur visual pigment. , 2002, Molecular biology and evolution.
[12] D. Baker,et al. Improved recognition of native‐like protein structures using a combination of sequence‐dependent and sequence‐independent features of proteins , 1999, Proteins.
[13] M. Matz,et al. Evolution of Coral Pigments Recreated , 2004, Science.
[14] John R Desjarlais,et al. A de novo redesign of the WW domain , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[15] Wendell A. Lim,et al. Optimization of specificity in a cellular protein interaction network by negative selection , 2003, Nature.
[16] Jeffrey B. Endelman,et al. Structure-Guided Recombination Creates an Artificial Family of Cytochromes P450 , 2006, PLoS biology.
[17] D. Baker,et al. An orientation-dependent hydrogen bonding potential improves prediction of specificity and structure for proteins and protein-protein complexes. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[18] Rama Ranganathan,et al. Knowledge-based potential functions in protein design. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.
[19] W. Aehle,et al. Construction of stabilized proteins by combinatorial consensus mutagenesis. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[20] Jon E. Ness,et al. Synthetic shuffling expands functional protein diversity by allowing amino acids to recombine independently , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.
[21] P. Harbury,et al. Automated design of specificity in molecular recognition , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.
[22] A. D. McLachlan,et al. Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.
[23] W. P. Russ,et al. Evolutionary information for specifying a protein fold , 2005, Nature.
[24] S. Demarest,et al. Optimization of the antibody C(H)3 domain by residue frequency analysis of IgG sequences. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.
[25] Thomas E. Ferrin,et al. Designed divergent evolution of enzyme function , 2006, Nature.
[26] Hidetoshi Kono,et al. Computational design and characterization of a monomeric helical dinuclear metalloprotein. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[27] David Crews,et al. Resurrecting the Ancestral Steroid Receptor: Ancient Origin of Estrogen Signaling , 2003, Science.
[28] D. Baker,et al. A large scale test of computational protein design: folding and stability of nine completely redesigned globular proteins. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[29] L. H. Bradley,et al. De novo proteins from designed combinatorial libraries , 2004, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[30] Julia M. Shifman,et al. Exploring the origins of binding specificity through the computational redesign of calmodulin , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[31] Design of lambda Cro fold: solution structure of a monomeric variant of the de novo protein. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.
[32] Julia M. Shifman,et al. Modulating calmodulin binding specificity through computational protein design. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.
[33] Yinan Wei,et al. Enzyme-like proteins from an unselected library of designed amino acid sequences. , 2004, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.
[34] W. P. Russ,et al. Natural-like function in artificial WW domains , 2005, Nature.
[35] M. Ota,et al. Design of λ Cro Fold: Solution Structure of a Monomeric Variant of the De Novo Protein , 2005 .
[36] S L Mayo,et al. Pairwise calculation of protein solvent-accessible surface areas. , 1998, Folding & design.
[37] Jeffery G. Saven,et al. Computational design of water-soluble analogues of the potassium channel KcsA , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[38] Linda A. Castle,et al. Discovery and Directed Evolution of a Glyphosate Tolerance Gene , 2004, Science.
[39] Rama Ranganathan,et al. Structural Determinants of Allosteric Ligand Activation in RXR Heterodimers , 2004, Cell.
[40] S. L. Mayo,et al. De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized α/β-barrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure , 2003 .
[41] Loren L Looger,et al. Computational design of receptors for an organophosphate surrogate of the nerve agent soman. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[42] W. DeGrado,et al. Computational design of a water‐soluble analog of phospholamban , 2003, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.
[43] Rama Ranganathan,et al. Allosteric determinants in guanine nucleotide-binding proteins , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[44] F. Cohen,et al. An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.
[45] L L Looger,et al. Computational design of a Zn2+ receptor that controls bacterial gene expression , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[46] S. L. Mayo,et al. De novo backbone and sequence design of an idealized alpha/beta-barrel protein: evidence of stable tertiary structure. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.
[47] J G Saven,et al. Statistical theory for protein combinatorial libraries. Packing interactions, backbone flexibility, and the sequence variability of a main-chain structure. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[48] D. Baker,et al. Design of a Novel Globular Protein Fold with Atomic-Level Accuracy , 2003, Science.
[49] Stefan M. Larson,et al. Analysis of covariation in an SH3 domain sequence alignment: applications in tertiary contact prediction and the design of compensating hydrophobic core substitutions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.
[50] S. Benner,et al. Inferring the palaeoenvironment of ancient bacteria on the basis of resurrected proteins , 2003, Nature.
[51] Wei Yang,et al. Design of a calcium-binding protein with desired structure in a cell adhesion molecule. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[52] E. Shakhnovich,et al. Understanding hierarchical protein evolution from first principles. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.
[53] Vikas Nanda,et al. De novo design of a redox-active minimal rubredoxin mimic. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.
[54] Ke Liu,et al. A despecialization step underlying evolution of a family of serine proteases. , 2003, Molecular cell.
[55] C. Anfinsen. Principles that govern the folding of protein chains. , 1973, Science.