Spatial dependence of the nonlinear BOLD response at short stimulus duration

Most functional magnetic resonance imaging studies use linear models to predict the measured response by convolution of an impulse response with the stimulus profile. Using very short visual presentation times (<2 s), deviation from the linear model in the measured BOLD data from the human brain was found for the response integral, amplitude, and width. In this study, high temporal and spatial resolution were used to quantify nonlinear effects and investigate the spatial dependence. Data at 4 Tesla showed at short stimulus duration a nonlinearity, i.e., deviation from a linear model, with an index up to 400%, whereas data at 7 Tesla exhibited a nonlinearity index up to 40%. The effect was more pronounced for response amplitude than for response area. A reduced width and sharpening of responses at shorter stimulus duration was also found. A voxel-based analysis of 7 Tesla data with 1.2 x 1.2 x 2 mm(3) resolution revealed a correlation between response onset and nonlinearity index. This suggests that the nonlinearity effects are a tissue-specific phenomenon and are likely to be more localized to the site of neuronal activity. The observed magnetic field dependence and the demonstrated nonlinearity in the response width support the hypothesis that the source of the nonlinearity at short stimulus duration has a considerable hemodynamic contribution. The nonlinearity was modeled as a "switch"-type initial hemodynamic response onset. Understanding these nonlinearities in the BOLD response is important for design and the analysis of rapid event-related fMRI experiments with brief stimulus presentations.

[1]  E. Zarahn,et al.  Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism Coupling of Neural Activation to Blood Flow in the Somatosensory Cortex of Rats Is Time-intensity Separable, but Not Linear , 2022 .

[2]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a Refractory Period in the Hemodynamic Response to Visual Stimuli as Measured by MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[3]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  Essa Yacoub,et al.  Zoomed Functional Imaging in the Human Brain at 7 Tesla with Simultaneous High Spatial and High Temporal Resolution , 2002, NeuroImage.

[5]  Adrian T. Lee,et al.  Discrimination of Large Venous Vessels in Time‐Course Spiral Blood‐Oxygen‐Level‐Dependent Magnetic‐Resonance Functional Neuroimaging , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  L DelaBarre,et al.  BISTRO: An outer‐volume suppression method that tolerates RF field inhomogeneity , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  G. Glover,et al.  Correction of physiologically induced global off‐resonance effects in dynamic echo‐planar and spiral functional imaging , 2002, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Coupling between Evoked rCBF and BOLD Signals: A Simulation Study of Hemodynamic Responses , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[10]  A. Dale,et al.  Deconvolution of Event-Related fMRI Responses in Fast-Rate Experimental Designs: Tracking Amplitude Variations , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  A. Shmuel,et al.  Imaging brain function in humans at 7 Tesla , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[13]  S. Ogawa,et al.  An approach to probe some neural systems interaction by functional MRI at neural time scale down to milliseconds. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  M Bach,et al.  Coupling of neural activity and BOLD fMRI response: New insights by combination of fMRI and VEP experiments in transition from single events to continuous stimulation , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[15]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Parametric Analysis of fMRI Data Using Linear Systems Methods , 1997, NeuroImage.

[16]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[17]  R Gruetter,et al.  Field mapping without reference scan using asymmetric echo‐planar techniques , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  J. Strupp Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package , 1996, NeuroImage.

[19]  K. Kashikura,et al.  Bayesian technique for investigating linearity in event‐related BOLD fMRI , 2001, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  Wolfgang Engelien,et al.  A CBF-Based Event-Related Brain Activation Paradigm: Characterization of Impulse–Response Function and Comparison to BOLD , 2000, NeuroImage.

[21]  Antígona Martínez,et al.  Nonlinear temporal dynamics of the cerebral blood flow response , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[22]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  D. Noll,et al.  Nonlinear Aspects of the BOLD Response in Functional MRI , 1998, NeuroImage.