Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis: From Regulatory Requirements to Conceptual Structure and Computational Implementation

An approach to the conversion of regulatory requirements into a conceptual and computational structure that permits meaningful uncertainty and sensitivity analyses is descibed. This approach is predicated on the description of the desired analysis in terms of three basic entities: (i) a probability space characterizing aleatory uncertainty, (ii) a probability space characterizing epistemic uncertainty, and (iii) a model that predicts system behavior. The presented approach is illustrated with results from the 2008 performance assessment for the proposed repository for high-level radioactive waste at Yucca Mountain, Nevada.

[1]  Ronald L. Iman,et al.  Expert opinion in risk analysis: the NUREG-1150 methodology , 1989 .

[2]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Performance Assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant: From Regulation to Calculation for 40 CFR 191.13 , 1997, Oper. Res..

[3]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Conceptual structure of the 1996 performance assessment for the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant , 2000, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems , 2002 .

[5]  R. Eliassen.  DISPOSAL OF HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES , 1964 .

[6]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[7]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Quantification of margins and uncertainties: Conceptual and computational basis , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Calculation of reactor accident safety goals , 1993 .

[9]  Richard J. Beckman,et al.  A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output From a Computer Code , 2000, Technometrics.

[10]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Computational implementation of sampling-based approaches to the calculation of expected dose in performance assessments for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: Description of techniques , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Quantification of Margins and Uncertainties , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  M. Elisabeth Paté-Cornell,et al.  Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment , 1996 .

[14]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[15]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems , 1996 .

[16]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Conceptual basis for the definition and calculation of expected dose in performance assessments for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada , 2009, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  S. Rahman.  Reliability Engineering and System Safety , 2011 .