Application of flow cytometry in diagnosing lymphomas in dogs and cats

Classification of types of lymphomas is done by interpreting cell morphology results obtained in cytological and/or histological examinations. In recent years, additional methods like immunocytochemistry (ICC), immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunophenotyping by flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for antigen receptor rearrangements (PARR), have been used to diagnose and classify lymphomas. Unfortunately, none of these methods is completely specific and sensitive. Thus, a combination of several diagnostic methods or use of all available techniques allows for evaluation of morphological properties of cells like their maturity and diversification. Owing to the use of sets of antibodies it is possible to identify the phenotype of hyperplastic cells as well as their origin. Combination of results obtained through phenotypical analysis with flow cytometry examination with morphological, histological and genetic testing enables a detailed analysis of, in this case, lymphoproliferative diseases including reaction changes, primary and secondary immunological deficits as well as autoimmune diseases.

[1]  Paul R. Avery,et al.  Flow Cytometric Characterization and Clinical Outcome of CD4+ T‐Cell Lymphoma in Dogs: 67 Cases , 2014, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[2]  L. Williams,et al.  Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in the cat: 18 cases (2000-2010). , 2013, Veterinary and comparative oncology.

[3]  D. Bienzle,et al.  Making sense of lymphoma diagnostics in small animal patients. , 2013, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[4]  H. Nakayama,et al.  Cytomorphological and immunological classification of feline lymphomas: clinicopathological features of 76 cases. , 2013, The Journal of veterinary medical science.

[5]  Paul R. Avery,et al.  Class II major histocompatibility complex expression and cell size independently predict survival in canine B-cell lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[6]  D. Bienzle,et al.  The diagnostic assessment of canine lymphoma: implications for treatment. , 2011, Clinics in laboratory medicine.

[7]  M. Miller,et al.  Classification of Canine Malignant Lymphomas According to the World Health Organization Criteria , 2011, Veterinary pathology.

[8]  Paul R. Avery,et al.  Canine lymphoproliferative disease characterized by lymphocytosis: immunophenotypic markers of prognosis. , 2008, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.

[9]  M. Goldschmidt,et al.  Nasal and Nasopharyngeal Lymphoma in Cats: 50 Cases (1989–2005) , 2007, Veterinary pathology.

[10]  Paul R. Avery,et al.  Determining the significance of persistent lymphocytosis. , 2007, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[11]  L. Barber,et al.  Lineage differentiation of canine lymphoma/leukemias and aberrant expression of CD molecules. , 2005, Veterinary immunology and immunopathology.

[12]  M. Caldin,et al.  Use of Fine Needle Aspirates and Flow Cytometry for the Diagnosis, Classification, and Immunophenotyping of Canine Lymphomas , 2005, Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc.

[13]  L. Marconato,et al.  Immunophenotype predicts survival time in dogs with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. , 2011, Journal of veterinary internal medicine.