The Future Looks “Right”: Effects of the Horizontal Location of Advertising Images on Product Attitude

Consumers from cultures that read from left to right possess a spatial representation of time whereby the past is visualized on the left and the future is visualized on the right. Across four studies, the current research investigates whether and how this past-left, future-right conceptualization of time affects attitudes toward time-related products. Specifically, when consumers view advertisements in which product images are positioned congruently (incongruently) with their spatial representation of time, they have more (less) favorable attitudes toward the product. This effect occurs for both products that naturally involve the progression of time (e.g., self-improvement products) and also products for which a time component is a desired attribute (e.g., antiques). The effect of horizontal position reverses among consumers who read from right to left. The mediating role of processing fluency is highlighted as an underlying mechanism, and the moderating role of need for structure is identified.

[1]  Martin H. Fischer,et al.  Reading space into numbers – a cross-linguistic comparison of the SNARC effect , 2008, Cognition.

[2]  Rashmi Adaval,et al.  Contrast and Assimilation Effects of Processing Fluency , 2010 .

[3]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Evaluating persuasion-enhancing techniques from a resource-matching perspective , 1997 .

[4]  Anjan Chatterjee,et al.  Language and space: some interactions , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Christian Dobel,et al.  How Writing System and Age Influence Spatial Representations of Actions , 2007, Psychological science.

[6]  Marc Ouellet,et al.  In hindsight, life flows from left to right , 2010, Psychological research.

[7]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  How Languages Construct Time , 2011 .

[8]  Lera Boroditsky,et al.  Do English and Mandarin Speakers Think Differently About Time , 2008 .

[9]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  On Southbound Ease and Northbound Fees: Literal Consequences of the Metaphoric Link between Vertical Position and Cardinal Direction , 2009 .

[10]  S. Christman,et al.  Lateral biases in aesthetic preferences: pictorial dimensions and neural mechanisms. , 1997, Laterality.

[11]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  The Effect of Conceptual and Perceptual Fluency on Brand Evaluation , 2004 .

[13]  R. Dhar,et al.  Preference Fluency in Choice , 2007 .

[14]  C. D. De Dreu,et al.  Personal Need for Structure and Creative Performance: The Moderating Influence of Fear of Invalidity , 2007, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[15]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Space, time and number in the brain : searching for the foundations of mathematical thought , 2011 .

[16]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Position-based beliefs: The center-stage effect , 2009 .

[17]  Marc Ouellet,et al.  Thinking about the future moves attention to the right. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Thomas W. Schubert.  Your highness: vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Effects of Perceptual Fluency on Judgments of Truth , 1999, Consciousness and Cognition.

[20]  S. West,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions. , 1994 .

[21]  A. Chatterjee,et al.  Verbs, events and spatial representations , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[22]  Meredith O'Brien,et al.  The prejudiced personality revisited: Personal need for structure and formation of erroneous group stereotypes. , 1995 .

[23]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[24]  Michael D. Robinson,et al.  Does "feeling down" mean seeing down? Depressive symptoms and vertical selective attention. , 2006 .

[25]  Thomas M. Spalek,et al.  The Left-to-Right Bias in Inhibition of Return Is Due to the Direction of Reading , 2005, Psychological science.

[26]  B. Tversky,et al.  Cross-cultural and developmental trends in graphic productions , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  Margaret C. Campbell,et al.  The Moderating Effect of Perceived Risk on Consumers’ Evaluations of Product Incongruity: Preference for the Norm , 2001 .

[28]  Anne Maass,et al.  Directional Bias in the Mental Representation of Spatial Events , 2003, Psychological science.

[29]  Steven L. Neuberg,et al.  Personal Need for Structure: Individual Differences in the Desire for Simple Structure , 1993 .

[30]  Priya Raghubir,et al.  Shelf space schemas: Myth or reality? ☆ , 2013 .

[31]  Wim Fias,et al.  The Mental Representation of Ordinal Sequences is Spatially Organised: Evidence from Days of the Week , 2004, Cortex.

[32]  Aparna A. Labroo,et al.  Between Two Brands: A Goal Fluency Account of Brand Evaluation , 2006 .

[33]  Gordon B. Moskowitz,et al.  Individual differences in social categorization: The influence of personal need for structure on spontaneous trait inferences. , 1993 .

[34]  L. Boroditsky,et al.  Do English and Mandarin speakers think about time differently? , 2011, Cognition.

[35]  Orly Fuhrman,et al.  Cross-Cultural Differences in Mental Representations of Time: Evidence From an Implicit Nonlinguistic Task , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[36]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The mental representation of parity and number magnitude. , 1993 .

[37]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  An effect of spatial–temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time , 2008, Cognition.

[38]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Value from Regulatory Construal Fit: The Persuasive Impact of Fit between Consumer Goals and Message Concreteness , 2010 .

[39]  Samar Zebian,et al.  Linkages between Number Concepts, Spatial Thinking, and Directionality of Writing: The SNARC Effect and the REVERSE SNARC Effect in English and Arabic Monoliterates, Biliterates, and Illiterate Arabic Speakers , 2005 .

[40]  Xiaoyan Deng,et al.  Is Your Product on the Right Side? The “Location Effect” on Perceived Product Heaviness and Package Evaluation , 2009 .

[41]  N. Christenfeld.  Choices from Identical Options , 1995 .

[42]  Brian P. Meier,et al.  Failing to take the moral high ground : Psychopathy and the vertical representation of morality , 2007 .

[43]  L. Boroditsky.  Does Language Shape Thought?: Mandarin and English Speakers' Conceptions of Time , 2001, Cognitive Psychology.

[44]  M. Robert Barnett,et al.  Hindsight , 1958 .

[45]  Julio Santiago,et al.  Time (also) flies from left to right , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[46]  K. Keith.  Nisbett, Richard E , 2013 .

[47]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  Preconscious processing effect: The independence of atti-tude formation and conscious thought , 1988 .

[48]  Chris Janiszewski,et al.  The Influence of Print Advertisement Organization on Affect Toward a Brand Name , 1990 .

[49]  R. Drake.  Effects of gaze manipulation on aesthetic judgments: hemisphere priming of affect. , 1987, Acta psychologica.

[50]  C. Judd,et al.  When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[51]  L. Boroditsky.  Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors , 2000, Cognition.

[52]  Mary T. Curren,et al.  How Does the Congruity of Brand Names Affect Evaluations of Brand Name Extensions , 1994 .

[53]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[54]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[55]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  Measuring the Value of Point-of-Purchase Marketing with Commercial Eye-Tracking Data , 2006 .

[56]  N. Schwarz.  Metacognitive Experiences in Consumer Judgment and Decision Making , 2004 .

[57]  Angela Y. Lee,et al.  It's Time to Vote: The Effect of Matching Message Orientation and Temporal Frame on Political Persuasion , 2009 .