Power transformations to induce normality and their applications

Random variables which are positive linear combinations of positive independent random variables can have heavily right-skewed finite sample distributions even though they might be asymptotically normally distributed. We provide a simple method of determining an appropriate power transformation to improve the normal approximation in small samples. Our method contains the Wilson-Hilferty cube root transformation for "χ"-super-2 random variables as a special case. We also provide some important examples, including test statistics of goodness-of-fit and tail index estimators, where such power transformations can be applied. In particular, we study the small sample behaviour of two goodness-of-fit tests for time series models which have been proposed recently in the literature. Both tests are generalizations of the popular Box-Ljung-Pierce portmanteau test, one in the time domain and the other in the frequency domain. A power transformation with a finite sample mean and variance correction is proposed, which ameliorates the small sample effect. It is found that the corrected versions of the tests have markedly better size properties. The correction is also found to result in an overall increase in power which can be significant under certain alternatives. Furthermore, the corrected tests also have better power than the Box-Ljung-Pierce portmanteau test, unlike the uncorrected versions. Copyright 2004 Royal Statistical Society.

[1]  M GREENWOOD,et al.  The statistical study of infectious diseases. , 1946, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A.

[2]  D. R. Jensen,et al.  A Gaussian Approximation to the Distribution of a Definite Quadratic Form , 1972 .

[3]  Efstathios Paparoditis,et al.  Spectral Density Based Goodness-of-Fit Tests for Time Series Models , 2000 .

[4]  I. Weissman.  Estimation of Parameters and Large Quantiles Based on the k Largest Observations , 1978 .

[5]  G. Box,et al.  On a measure of lack of fit in time series models , 1978 .

[6]  P. Hall.  Representations and limit theorems for extreme value distributions , 1978, Journal of Applied Probability.

[7]  Willa W. Chen,et al.  A GENERALIZED PORTMANTEAU GOODNESS-OF-FIT TEST FOR TIME SERIES MODELS , 2004, Econometric Theory.

[8]  Wai Keung Li,et al.  On Fractionally Integrated Autoregressive Moving-Average Time Series Models with Conditional Heteroscedasticity , 1997 .

[9]  R. Davies,et al.  Tests for Hurst effect , 1987 .

[10]  A test of fit in time series models , 1981 .

[11]  P. Hall.  The Bootstrap and Edgeworth Expansion , 1992 .

[12]  G. Box,et al.  Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive-Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models , 1970 .

[13]  E. J. Hannan,et al.  Multiple time series , 1970 .

[14]  E. B. Wilson,et al.  The Distribution of Chi-Square. , 1931, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  A. Lo,et al.  The Size and Power of the Variance Ratio Test in Finite Samples: a Monte Carlo Investigation , 1988 .

[16]  A. I. McLeod,et al.  Distribution of the Residual Autocorrelations in Multivariate Arma Time Series Models , 1981 .

[17]  Paul Deheuvels,et al.  Kernel Estimates of the Tail Index of a Distribution , 1985 .

[18]  Yongmiao Hong,et al.  Consistent Testing for Serial Correlation of Unknown Form , 1996 .

[19]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Time Series: Theory and Methods , 2013 .