A study on the atomic hydrophobicity of peptides in aqueous solutions using molecular dynamics modeling methods

Accurate quantification of the hydrophobic/hydrophilic properties of protein surfaces requires detailed knowledge of the hydrophobicity of amino acids at the atomic level. As discussed previously in various published papers, molecular modeling can be used with effect to acquire such knowledge. In this study, molecular dynamics methods have been employed to examine the role of the distance between an amino acid atom and its nearest water molecule in relation to its intrinsic atom hydrophobicity. This distance is the radius of the water-excluding-region around the atom; therefore, it can provide information on the solvent accessibility and steric hindrance that may influence the atom hydrophobicity. Molecular models of tripeptide in the form of GXG, and pentapeptides in the form of AcWLXLL-NH2 and AcGGXGGNH2 for 20 natural amino acids in the X position were constructed and allowed to dynamically interact with surrounding water for a sufficient period of time. The distance value for each atom in all natural amino acids were calculated and analyzed against the atom/amino acid's other parameters such as radial distribution function, solvent-accessible surface area, and hydrogen bonding. It was observed that, when the dynamic factor is taken into account, peptide molecular conformation is modified noticeably with residue type. For protein surface identification purposes, preliminary results are consistent with those reported in the literature on the need to include the amino acid structural properties as well as the effects of its neighboring residues. Further investigation is envisaged in order to verify these observations.

[1]  H. Sun,et al.  COMPASS: An ab Initio Force-Field Optimized for Condensed-Phase ApplicationsOverview with Details on Alkane and Benzene Compounds , 1998 .

[2]  C. Tanford,et al.  Empirical correlation between hydrophobic free energy and aqueous cavity surface area. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  T. Creamer,et al.  Solvation energies of amino acid side chains and backbone in a family of host-guest pentapeptides. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[4]  Dan V. Nicolau Database comprising biomolecular descriptors relevant to protein adsorption on microarray surfaces , 2002, SPIE BiOS.

[5]  Glen Eugene Kellogg,et al.  The effect of physical organic properties on hydrophobic fields , 1994, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[6]  J. Fauchère,et al.  Estimating and representing hydrophobicity potential , 1988 .

[7]  Milton T. W. Hearn,et al.  Physicochemical Basis of Amino Acid Hydrophobicity Scales: Evaluation of Four New Scales of Amino Acid Hydrophobicity Coefficients Derived from RP-HPLC of Peptides , 1995 .

[8]  M. Hearn Conformational Behaviour of polypeptides and proteins in reversed phase and lipophilic environments , 2002 .

[9]  Glen Eugene Kellogg,et al.  HINT: A new method of empirical hydrophobic field calculation for CoMFA , 1991, J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des..

[10]  Dan V. Nicolau Towards a theory of protein adsorption: predicting the adsorption of proteins on surfaces using a piecewise linear model validated using the Biomolecular Adsorption Database , 2004 .

[11]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[12]  M. Hearn,et al.  Analysis of Group Retention Contributions for Peptides Separated by Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography , 1981 .

[13]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  Estimation of atomic hydrophobicities using molecular dynamics simulation of peptides , 2007, SPIE Micro + Nano Materials, Devices, and Applications.

[14]  B. Lee,et al.  The interpretation of protein structures: estimation of static accessibility. , 1971, Journal of molecular biology.

[15]  G. Flynn Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology. , 1980 .

[16]  T. Richmond,et al.  Solvent accessible surface area and excluded volume in proteins. Analytical equations for overlapping spheres and implications for the hydrophobic effect. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[18]  Dan V. Nicolau,et al.  A New Program to Compute the Surface Properties of Biomolecules , 2003, APBC.

[19]  Pengyu Y. Ren,et al.  The COMPASS force field: parameterization and validation for phosphazenes , 1998 .

[20]  A. Leo,et al.  Extension of the fragment method to calculate amino acid zwitterion and side chain partition coefficients , 1987, Proteins.

[21]  I. R. Mcdonald,et al.  Theory of simple liquids , 1998 .