Development of Auditory Temporal Resolution in School-Age Children Revealed by Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Noise

Objective: The purpose of the study was to investigate the development of one aspect of auditory temporal resolution in normal-hearing school-age children with word recognition in quiet and in spectrally identical continuous and interrupted noise. Typically, listeners experience a perceptual advantage (i.e., a “release from masking”) in the interrupted noise relative to the continuous noise at equivalent signal-to-noise ratios (S/Ns). Any release from masking observed with children in the interrupted noise compared with the continuous noise at equivalent S/Ns could be interpreted as evidence for acquired temporal resolution ability. Differences in the amount of release from masking in the interrupted noise between children and adults could be interpreted as development of temporal resolution ability, or lack thereof, as revealed by word recognition in noise. It was hypothesized that word recognition performance would be poorer in children than adults; performance differences would be more pronounced with competition; word recognition performance would reach an asymptote to adult levels sooner in quiet than with competing stimuli; children would demonstrate better performance in the interrupted noise relative to the continuous noise (i.e., display a release from masking); and younger children would experience less release from masking compared with older children and adults (i.e., have less developed temporal resolution). Design: Eighty normal-hearing children aged 6 to 15 yr and 16 normal-hearing young adults participated. Word recognition performance with Northwestern University–Children’s Perception of Speech (NU-CHIPs) stimuli was evaluated with an open-set response mode in quiet and in backgrounds of competing continuous steady-state and interrupted noise at S/Ns of 10, 0, −10, and −20 dB. Both noises were essentially identical in their spectral content and differed only in their temporal continuity. Results: Performance was better in the interrupted noise at poorer S/Ns, increased with increasing S/N, and improved with increasing age. Younger listeners were more susceptible to noise. They did not experience an equivalent perceptual advantage (i.e., a release from masking) in the interrupted noise at poorer S/Ns (i.e., <10 dB) and generally required more favorable S/Ns to perform the same as the adult participants. These trends were less pronounced with increasing age. By 8 yr of age, children’s performance in quiet equated that of adult levels, but it did not do so in noise until after 11 yr of age. Conclusions: As revealed by their NU-CHIPs word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted noises, children’s temporal resolving abilities improve in their early school years and reach adult performance levels after 11 yr of age. It was speculated that these changes reflect maturation in their central auditory system.

[1]  Heather A. Knecht,et al.  Background noise levels and reverberation times in unoccupied classrooms: predictions and measurements. , 2002, American journal of audiology.

[2]  T W Tillman,et al.  Room acoustics effects on monosyllabic word discrimination ability for normal and hearing-impaired children. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[3]  C. Dunnett A Multiple Comparison Procedure for Comparing Several Treatments with a Control , 1955 .

[4]  Andrew Stuart,et al.  Unilateral auditory temporal resolution deficit: a case study. , 1999, Journal of communication disorders.

[5]  L. L. Elliott Performance of children aged 9 to 17 years on a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence material with controlled word predictability. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  D P Phillips,et al.  Impaired word recognition in noise by patients with noise-induced cochlear hearing loss: contribution of temporal resolution defect. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[7]  E. Owens,et al.  An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing , 1997 .

[8]  B C Moore,et al.  Across-channel masking and comodulation masking release. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  P Allen,et al.  Frequency resolution in children. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[10]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[11]  Masking of Speech by Repeated Bursts of Noise , 1954 .

[12]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  THE PERCEPTION OF SPEECH IN FLUCTUATING NOISE , 1993 .

[13]  J M Festen Contributions of comodulation masking release and temporal resolution to the speech-reception threshold masked by an interfering voice. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C F Papso,et al.  Word recognition skills of children and adults in background noise. , 1989, Ear and hearing.

[15]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[16]  R. Plomp,et al.  The Reception Threshold of Interrupted Speech for Hearing-Impaired Listeners , 1983 .

[17]  A. Small,et al.  Developmental patterns of duration discrimination. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[18]  F. Wightman,et al.  Spectral pattern discrimination by children. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[19]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The masking of speech. , 1947, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  R L McCroskey,et al.  Auditory fusion in children. , 1980, Child development.

[21]  I. Pollack,et al.  Interaction between forward and backward masking: a measure of the integrating period of the auditory system. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  L L Elliott Masking of tones before, during, and after brief silent periods in noise. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J H Grose,et al.  Frequency selectivity and comodulation masking release in adults and in 6-year-old children. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  J H Grose,et al.  Relative contributions of envelope maxima and minima to comodulation masking release. , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[26]  D. Dirks,et al.  Effect of forward and backward masking on speech intelligibility. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  R. H. Wilson,et al.  Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  A. Neuman,et al.  Children's perception of speech in reverberation. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  J. P. Morgan,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 2005, Technometrics.

[30]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  D P Phillips,et al.  Auditory temporal resolution in multiple sclerosis. , 1994, The Journal of otolaryngology.

[32]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Temporal masking effects: I. Broad band noise masker , 1976 .

[33]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's pure-tone detection. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  Phillips Dp Central auditory processing: a view from auditory neuroscience. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[35]  D P Phillips,et al.  Word recognition performance in continuous and interrupted broad-band noise by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[36]  Notched-noise measures of frequency selectivity in adults and children using fixed-masker-level and fixed-signal-level presentation. , 1991, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[37]  Central auditory processing: a view from auditory neuroscience. , 1995, The American journal of otology.

[38]  W F Rintelmann,et al.  Articulation functions and test-retest performance of normal-hearing children on three speech discrimination tests: WIPI, PBK-50, and NV Auditory Test No. 6. , 1976, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[39]  J. Jensen,et al.  Development of Basic Auditory Discrimination in Preschool Children , 1993 .

[40]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[41]  R. J. Irwin,et al.  The development of auditory temporal acuity in children. , 1985, Child development.

[42]  L. L. Elliott,et al.  Adult and child discrimination of CV syllables differing in voicing onset time. , 1986, Child development.

[43]  J H Grose,et al.  Temporal analysis in children. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[44]  I Hochberg,et al.  Development of Psychoacoustic Behavior: Sensitivity and Discrimination , 1982, Ear and hearing.

[45]  W. Yost Pitch and pitch discrimination of broadband signals with rippled power spectra. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[46]  Dan H. Sanes,et al.  the refinement of central auditory form and function during development , 1992 .

[47]  Andrew Stuart,et al.  Word Recognition in Continuous and Interrupted Broadband Noise by Young Normal‐Hearing, Older Normal‐Hearing, and Presbyacusic Listeners , 1996, Ear and hearing.

[48]  D. Dirks,et al.  Effect of pulsed masking on selected speech materials. , 1969, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[49]  J H Grose,et al.  Development of adult-like performance in backward, simultaneous, and forward masking. , 1999, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[50]  Lois Thibault,et al.  Implementation of ANSI S12.60 acoustical performance criteria, design requirements and guidelines for schools , 2001 .

[51]  T W Tillman,et al.  Binaural maskin of speech by periodically modulated noise. , 1966, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[52]  D B Hawkins,et al.  Speech recognition in noise and reverberation by school-age children. , 1987, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[53]  R. Bendel,et al.  Equivalent forms and split-half reliability of the NU-CHIPS administered in noise. , 1984, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[54]  R. Fior,et al.  Physiological maturation of auditory function between 3 and 13 years of age. , 1972, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[55]  C. Johnson,et al.  Children's phoneme identification in reverberation and noise. , 2000, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  A Stuart,et al.  Interactive effects of low-pass filtering and masking noise on word recognition. , 2001, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[57]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Word recognition in continuous noise, interrupted noise, and in quiet by normal-hearing listeners at two sensation levels. , 1997, Scandinavian audiology.

[58]  W. Yost Strength of the pitches associated with ripple noise. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[59]  Hugo Fastl,et al.  Temporal masking effects: III. Pure tone masker , 1979 .

[60]  A. Thornton,et al.  Confidence levels for differences between speech-discrimination scores. A research note. , 1980, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[61]  J L Cranford,et al.  Tracking of "moving" fused auditory images by children. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[62]  F. Wightman,et al.  Psychometric functions for children's detection of tones in noise. , 1994, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[63]  J. S. Bradley Predictors of speech intelligibility in rooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[64]  J H Grose,et al.  Comodulation masking release using SAM tonal complex maskers: effects of modulation depth and signal position. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[65]  G. A. Miller,et al.  The Intelligibility of Interrupted Speech , 1948 .

[66]  John S. Bradley,et al.  Revisiting Speech Interference in Classrooms:Revisando la interferencia en el habla dentro del salón de clases , 2001 .

[67]  Tricia B. K. Chirillo,et al.  Effects of word predictability, child development, and aging on time-gated speech recognition performance. , 1993, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[68]  G. Studebaker A "rationalized" arcsine transform. , 1985, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[69]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[70]  Phillips Dp,et al.  Impaired Word Recognition in Noise by Patients with Noise-Induced Cochlear Hearing-Loss - Contribution of Temporal Resolution Defect , 1994 .

[71]  R H Wilson,et al.  Forward and backward masking: interactions and additivity. , 1971, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[72]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[73]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Speech recognition with reduced spectral cues as a function of age. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[74]  Masking by a Periodically Interrupted Noise , 1955 .

[75]  N. Viemeister Temporal modulation transfer functions based upon modulation thresholds. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[76]  L L Elliott,et al.  Children's understanding of monosyllabic nouns in quiet and in noise. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[77]  D. Jamieson,et al.  Temporal resolution in children. , 1989, Child development.

[78]  L. L. Elliott,et al.  Age differences in discrimination of simulated single-formant frequency transitions , 1989, Perception & psychophysics.