The Role of Facebook in the 2014 Greek Municipal Elections

The purpose of this study is to examine the use of Facebook by candidates running for the 2014 Greek Municipal Elections by addressing the following questions: (1) which factors affect Facebook adoption by municipal candidates?, and (2) whether Facebook usage along with the popularity of candidates’ Facebook pages influence candidates’ vote share. Results indicate that Facebook is not a very popular campaigning tool among municipal candidates in Greece. This implies that Greek candidates still rely on traditional ways to lure their voters. Furthermore, findings reveal that candidates running in large municipalities who hadn’t been elected before are more likely to utilize Facebook as a means of political marketing. Despite the low adoption rate, results suggested that candidates who made use of Facebook won more votes compared to non-Facebook candidates. Moreover, it was found that a candidate’s Facebook page popularity is a good indicator of the candidate’s vote share.

[1]  David A. Dulio,et al.  The Web 2.0 Election: Does the Online Medium Matter? , 2011 .

[2]  Nicolas Demertzis,et al.  Greek Political Marketing Online , 2005 .

[3]  G. Enli,et al.  PERSONALIZED CAMPAIGNS IN PARTY-CENTRED POLITICS , 2013 .

[4]  Thomas J. Johnson,et al.  Introduction: The Facebook Election , 2010 .

[5]  I. Pena-Lopez.  Striving Behind the Shadow: The Dawn of Spanish Politics 2.0 , 2011 .

[6]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Social Media and Campaign 2012 , 2013 .

[7]  Rune Karlsen.  A Platform for Individualized Campaigning? Social Media and Parliamentary Candidates in the 2009 Norwegian Election Campaign , 2011 .

[8]  Maurice Vergeer,et al.  Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning , 2013 .

[9]  Girish J. Gulati,et al.  Gulati elections of 2006 and 2008 Social networks in political campaigns : Facebook and the congressional , 2013 .

[10]  Sonja Utz,et al.  The (Potential) Benefits of Campaigning via Social Network Sites , 2009, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[11]  JungherrAndreas,et al.  Why the Pirate Party Won the German Election of 2009 or The Trouble With Predictions , 2012 .

[12]  S. Papathanassopoulos.  Election Campaigning in the Television Age: The Case of Contemporary Greece , 2000 .

[13]  Kim Strandberg,et al.  A social media revolution or just a case of history repeating itself? The use of social media in the 2011 Finnish parliamentary elections , 2013, New Media Soc..

[14]  V. Gueorguieva,et al.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[15]  Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic,et al.  Political participation and web 2.0 in Europe: a case study of Facebook , 2012 .

[16]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  Social Media and Political Participation: Are Facebook, Twitter and YouTube Democratizing Our Political Systems? , 2011, ePart.

[17]  GueorguievaVassia.  Voters, MySpace, and YouTube , 2008 .

[18]  Nicolas Demertzis PhD in sociology.  Greek Political Marketing Online , 2005 .

[19]  Ivan Horrocks,et al.  New Technology and Democratic Renewal : The Evidence Assessed , 2000 .

[20]  Kim Normann Andersen,et al.  The Use of Facebook in National Election Campaigns: Politics as Usual? , 2009, ePart.

[21]  Lee Rainie.  A Biography of the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project , 2012 .

[22]  P. Chen.  Candidates' new media use in the 2007 Australian national election , 2008 .

[23]  Pippa Norris,et al.  A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies , 2000 .

[24]  J. Macnamara,et al.  E-Electioneering 2010: Trends in Social Media Use in Australian Political Communication , 2011 .