Steady-state diffusion of water through soft-contact-lens materials.

Water transport through soft contact lenses (SCL) is important for acceptable performance on the human eye. Chemical-potential gradient-driven diffusion rates of water through SCL materials are measured with an evaporation-cell technique. Water is evaporated from the bottom surface of a lens membrane by impinging air at controlled flow rate and humidity. The resulting weight loss of a water reservoir covering the top surface of the contact-lens material is recorded as a function of time. New results are reported for a conventional hydrogel material (SofLens One Day, hilafilcon A, water content at saturation w10 = 70 weight %) and a silicone hydrogel material (PureVision, balafilcon A, w10 = 36%), with and without surface oxygen plasma treatment. Also, previously reported data for a conventional 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA)-SCL (w10 = 38%) hydrogel are reexamined and compared with those for SofLens One Day and PureVision hydrogels. Measured steady-state water fluxes are largest for SofLens One Day, followed by PureVision and HEMA. In some cases, the measured steady-state water fluxes increase with rising relative air humidity. This increase, due to an apparent mass-transfer resistance at the surface (trapping skinning), is associated with formation of a glassy skin at the air/membrane interface when the relative humidity is below 55-75%. Steady-state water fluxes are interpreted through an extended Maxwell-Stefan diffusion model for a mixture of species starkly different in size. Thermodynamic nonideality is considered through Flory-Rehner polymer-solution theory. Shrinking/swelling is self-consistently modeled by conservation of the total polymer mass. Fitted Maxwell-Stefan diffusivities increase significantly with water concentration in the contact lens.

[1]  N Pritchard,et al.  Dehydration, lens movement and dryness ratings of hydrogel contact lenses. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[2]  N. Efron,et al.  Surface hydration of hydrogel contact lenses , 1986 .

[3]  J. Pope,et al.  A comparison of water binding and mobility in contact lens hydrogels from NMR measurements of the water self-diffusion coefficient , 2000 .

[4]  C. Manetti,et al.  Diffusive contribution to permeation of hydrogel contact lenses: theoretical model and experimental evaluation by nuclear magnetic resonance techniques , 2002 .

[5]  G. Somorjai,et al.  Surface mechanical properties of pHEMA contact lenses: viscoelastic and adhesive property changes on exposure to controlled humidity. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[6]  Orsborn Gn,et al.  Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water content contact lenses. , 1988 .

[7]  A. Bruce,et al.  Environmental Influences on Hydrogel Lens Dehydration and the Postlens Tear Film , 1995 .

[8]  Ross Taylor,et al.  Multicomponent mass transfer , 1993 .

[9]  D Fonn,et al.  Hydrogel lens dehydration and subjective comfort and dryness ratings in symptomatic and asymptomatic contact lens wearers. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[10]  P. Flory.  Statistical Mechanics of Swelling of Network Structures , 1950 .

[11]  A. Bruce,et al.  Osmotic determinants of postlens tear film morphology and hydrogel lens movement. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[12]  M. Refojo.  Permeation of water through some hydrogels , 1965 .

[13]  P. Flory.  Principles of polymer chemistry , 1953 .

[14]  R. Cairncross,et al.  Non‐Fickian nonisothermal model for drying of polymer coatings , 2002 .

[15]  M. Delfini,et al.  Investigation of water dynamic behaviour in poly(HEMA) and poly(HEMA-co-DHPMA) hydrogels by proton T2 relaxation time and self-diffusion coefficient n.m.r. measurements , 1998 .

[16]  J. Prausnitz,et al.  Sorption and transport of water vapor in thin polymer films at 35 °C , 2004 .

[17]  Richard A. Cairncross,et al.  A model for drying of viscoelastic polymer coatings , 1996 .

[18]  J. G. Wijmans,et al.  The solution-diffusion model: a review , 1995 .

[19]  I. Fatt.  A predictive model for dehydration of a hydrogel contact lens in the eye , 1989 .

[20]  A. Bruce,et al.  Postlens tear film morphology, lens movement and symptoms in hydrogel lens wearers , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[21]  Yi-Ming Sun,et al.  Sorption/desorption properties of water vapour in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate): 1. Experimental and preliminary analysis , 1996 .

[22]  J. Vogt,et al.  Soft contact lens polymers: an evolution. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[23]  J. M. Watson,et al.  The behaviour of water in poly(dimethylsiloxane) , 1996 .

[24]  S. Muller,et al.  Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components , 2004, Current eye research.

[25]  M. Monticelli,et al.  The Effect of Water Hydraulic Permeability on the Settling of a Soft Contact Lens on the Eye , 2005, Current eye research.

[26]  M. Harris,et al.  Soft lens movement: effects of humidity and hypertonic saline on lens settling. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[27]  N. Efron,et al.  Dehydration of hydrogel lenses under normal wearing conditions. , 1987, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[28]  D. Chin,et al.  Mass Transfer to an Impinging Jet Electrode , 1978 .

[29]  J. Prausnitz,et al.  Glass-transition temperatures for soft-contact-lens materials. Dependence on water content , 2005 .

[30]  Yi-Ming Sun.  Sorption/desorption properties of water vapour in poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate): 2. Two-stage sorption models , 1996 .

[31]  V. S. Vaidhyanathan,et al.  Transport phenomena , 2005, Experientia.

[32]  D. Korb,et al.  Lid-wiper epitheliopathy and dry-eye symptoms in contact lens wearers. , 2002, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[33]  S. Zantos,et al.  Corneal desiccation staining with thin high water content contact lenses. , 1988, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[34]  C. Ranganathaiah,et al.  Water sorption studies in a RGP contact lens polymer paraperm by positron lifetime technique , 2002 .

[35]  H. Junginger,et al.  Water mobility and structure in poly[2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate] hydrogels by means of the pulsed field gradient NMR technique. , 1993, Biomaterials.

[36]  John Crank,et al.  The Mathematics Of Diffusion , 1956 .

[37]  A. Güner,et al.  Characterization and determination of swelling and diffusion characteristics of poly(n‐vinyl‐2‐pyrrolidone) hydrogels in water , 2000 .

[38]  C. Radke,et al.  Permeability and diffusivity for water transport through hydrogel membranes , 2003 .

[39]  J. Künzler.  Silicone Hydrogels for Contact Lens Application , 1996 .

[40]  J. Pope,et al.  1H NMR T2 relaxation in contact lens hydrogels as a probe of water mobility , 2001 .

[41]  P. Morgan,et al.  Hydrogel contact lens dehydration and oxygen transmissibility. , 1999, The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc.

[42]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes: FORTRAN , 1988 .

[43]  J. Pope,et al.  Water and Polymer Mobility in Hydrogel Biomaterials Quantified by 1H NMR: A Simple Model Describing Both T1 and T2 Relaxation , 2002 .

[44]  T. K. Goldstick,et al.  Dynamics of water transport in swelling membranes. , 1965, Journal of colloid science.

[45]  P. Schaetzel,et al.  Sorption, diffusion and vapor permeation of various penetrants through dense poly(dimethylsiloxane) membranes: a transport analysis , 1994 .

[46]  J. Prausnitz,et al.  Diffusivity of water through a HEMA-based soft contact lens , 2005 .

[47]  D. Martin.  Water transport in dehydrating hydrogel contact lenses: implications for corneal desiccation. , 1995, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[48]  J. Harmon,et al.  2,3-Dihydroxypropyl methacrylate and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate hydrogels: gel structure and transport properties , 2003 .

[49]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Micromixing efficiency in static mixer , 2001 .

[50]  P. Flory,et al.  STATISTICAL MECHANICS OF CROSS-LINKED POLYMER NETWORKS II. SWELLING , 1943 .

[51]  Refojo Mf,et al.  Water pervaporation through silicone rubber contact lenses: a possible cause of complications. , 1981 .

[52]  William H. Press,et al.  Numerical Recipes in Fortran 77 , 1992 .

[53]  Jeremy P. Meyers,et al.  Simulation of the Direct Methanol Fuel Cell II. Modeling and Data Analysis of Transport and Kinetic Phenomena , 2002 .

[54]  A. Whittaker,et al.  Water sorption into poly[(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)-co-(1-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone)]at 310 K , 2003 .

[55]  H. Hamano.  The change of precorneal tear film by the application of contact lenses. , 1981, Contact and intraocular lens medical journal.

[56]  P. Flory,et al.  Statistical Mechanics of Cross‐Linked Polymer Networks I. Rubberlike Elasticity , 1943 .

[57]  G. Somorjai,et al.  Effect of Equilibrium Bulk Water Content on the Humidity-Dependent Surface Mechanical Properties of Hydrophilic Contact Lenses Studied by Atomic Force Microscopy , 2003 .

[58]  Clayton J. Radke,et al.  Solubilities and diffusivities of water vapor in poly(methylmethacrylate), poly(2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate), poly(N-vinyl-2-pyrrolidone) and poly(acrylonitrile) , 2003 .

[59]  N. Efron,et al.  Characteristics of the pre‐lens tear film during hydrogel contact lens wear , 1991, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[60]  N. Efron,et al.  Dehydration of Hydrogel Lenses: Environmental Influences during Normal Wear , 1988, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[61]  J. Prausnitz,et al.  Multicomponent diffusion in highly asymmetric systems. An extended Maxwell-Stefan model for starkly different-sized, segment-accessible chain molecules , 2005 .