Identifying Social Interactions through Excess Variance Contrasts

This paper outlines a new method for detecting and assessing the strength of social interactions based on contrasts in excess variance across social groups of exogenously differing sizes. An attractive feature of the approach is its robustness to the presence of group-level heterogeneity and sorting. The proposed estimation strategy is used to test for the presence of peer effects in learning using data from the Tennessee class size reduction experiment Project STAR. Size-induced contrasts of excess variance provide a powerful mechanism for detecting peer group effects in this dataset. Switching from classroom where mean peer ability is at the 25th percentile of the ability distribution to one where it is at the 75th percentile is associated with changes in math and reading achievement scores of 0.9 and 1.1 standard deviations respectively. These estimates suggest that, at minimum, differences in peer composition are at least as important as those in teacher quality for explaining variation in academic achievement within Project STAR schools. While tests based on excess variance contrasts provide strong evidence of peer group effects, conventional regression-based excess sensitivity tests do not. Calibrating asymptotic power functions for the two tests to the Project STAR data suggests that across repeated samples the odds of detecting social interactions are roughly 20 to 30 times greater with the proposed excess variance test. Generalized method of moments provides a unified framework for estimation and inference. The proposed approach is straightforward to implement using standard software.

[1]  David A. Jaeger,et al.  Problems with Instrumental Variables Estimation when the Correlation between the Instruments and the Endogenous Explanatory Variable is Weak , 1995 .

[2]  C. Manski Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem , 1993 .

[3]  Guido W. Imbens,et al.  The Interpretation of Instrumental Variables Estimators in Simultaneous Equations Models with an Application to the Demand for Fish , 2000 .

[4]  James J. Heckman,et al.  Instrumental Variables Methods for the Correlated Random Coefficient Model: Estimating the Average Rate of Return to Schooling When the Return is Correlated with Schooling , 1998 .

[5]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  Social Economics: Market Behavior in a Social Environment , 2001 .

[6]  E. Lazear,et al.  Educational Production , 1999 .

[7]  A. Krueger,et al.  Would Smaller Classes Help Close the Black-White Achievement Gap? , 2001 .

[8]  George A. Akerlof Social Distance and Social Decisions , 1997 .

[9]  David N. Figlio,et al.  Competition between Private and Public Schools: Testing Stratification and Pricing Predictions , 2000 .

[10]  Marianne E. Page,et al.  Correlations between Neighboring Children in Their Subsequent Educational Attainment , 2000, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[11]  Andrew John,et al.  Coordinating Coordination Failures in Keynesian Models , 1988 .

[12]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Measuring Social Interactions , 1999 .

[13]  D. Rubin Estimation in Parallel Randomized Experiments , 1981 .

[14]  Jonathan H. Wright,et al.  A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments , 2002 .

[15]  Bruce Sacerdote,et al.  The Social Multiplier , 2002 .

[16]  T. Piketty,et al.  Theories of persistent inequality and intergenerational mobility , 2000 .

[17]  Michael A. Boozer,et al.  Inside the 'Black Box' of Project Star: Estimation of Peer Effects Using Experimental Data , 2001 .

[18]  Joaquim J. S. Ramalho,et al.  Asymptotic bias for GMM and GEL estimators with estimated nuisance parameters , 2003 .

[19]  Bryan S. Graham,et al.  Identification and estimation of the linear-in-means model of social interactions , 2005 .

[20]  Timothy R. C. Read,et al.  Multinomial goodness-of-fit tests , 1984 .

[21]  W. Newey,et al.  Generalized method of moments specification testing , 1985 .

[22]  Steven Durlauf,et al.  Social Capital , 2004 .

[23]  A. Krueger,et al.  Experimental Estimates of Education Production Functions , 1997 .

[24]  E. Hanushek Teacher Characteristics and Gains in Student Achievement: Estimation Using Micro Data. , 1971 .

[25]  M. Sobel,et al.  Identification Problems in the Social Sciences , 1996 .

[26]  Jonah E. Rockoff The Impact of Individual Teachers on Student Achievement: Evidence from Panel Data , 2004 .

[27]  Helen F. Ladd,et al.  Teacher-Student Matching and the Assessment of Teacher Effectiveness , 2006, The Journal of Human Resources.

[28]  W. Brock,et al.  Interactions-Based Models , 2000 .

[29]  Alejandro Gaviria,et al.  Increasing Returns and the Evolution of Violent Crime: The Case of Colombia , 1998 .

[30]  C. Hoxby How Does the Makeup of a Classroom Influence Achievement , 2002 .

[31]  Dennis Epple,et al.  Estimating Equilibrium Models of Local Jurisdictions , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[32]  Lars Lefgren Educational peer effects and the Chicago public schools , 2004 .

[33]  S. Durlauf Groups, social influences and inequality : a memberships theory perspective on poverty traps , 2002 .

[34]  David T. Burkam,et al.  Inequality at the Starting Gate: Social Background Differences in Achievement as Children Begin School , 2002 .

[35]  J. Stock,et al.  Instrumental Variables Regression with Weak Instruments , 1994 .

[36]  Giorgio Topa,et al.  Social interactions, local spillovers and unemployment , 2001 .

[37]  T. W. Anderson An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis , 1959 .

[38]  T. Nechyba Introducing School Choice into Multidistrict Public School Systems , 2003 .

[39]  Kevin Lang,et al.  Does School Integration Generate Peer Effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco Program , 2004, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[40]  Donald W. K. Andrews,et al.  POWER IN ECONOMETRIC APPLICATIONS , 1989 .

[41]  Whitney K. Newey,et al.  Higher Order Properties of Gmm and Generalized Empirical Likelihood Estimators , 2003 .

[42]  Jerry A. Hausman,et al.  Panel Data and Unobservable Individual Effects , 1981 .

[43]  E. Glaeser,et al.  Crime and Social Interactions , 1995 .

[44]  Duncan C. Thomas,et al.  Preliminary and Incomplete Comments Welcome Early Test Scores , Socioeconomic Status and Future Outcomes , 1998 .

[45]  Greg J. Duncan,et al.  Empathy or Antipathy? The Consequences of Racially and Socially Diverse Peers on Attitudes and Behaviors , 2003 .

[46]  Susan B. Gerber,et al.  The Enduring Effects of Small Classes. , 2001 .

[47]  R. Moffitt Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and So-cial Interactions , 1999 .

[48]  Thomas MaCurdy,et al.  The use of time series processes to model the error structure of earnings in a longitudinal data analysis , 1982 .

[49]  Sandra E. Black Do better schools matter? Parental valuation of elementary education , 1999 .

[50]  Bruce I. Sacerdote Peer Effects with Random Assignment: Results for Dartmouth Roommates , 2001 .