The Female Knee: Anatomic Variations

&NA; Traditional knee implants have been designed “down the middle,” based on the combined average size and shape of male and female knee anatomy. Sex‐based research in the field of orthopaedics has led to new understanding of the anatomic differences between the sexes and the associated implications for women undergoing total knee arthroplasty. Through the use of a comprehensive bone morphology atlas that utilizes novel three‐dimensional computed tomography analysis technology, significant anatomic differences have been documented in the shape and size of female knees compared with male knees. This research identifies three notable anatomic differences in the female population: a less prominent anterior condyle, an increased Q angle, and a reduced mediallateral: anterior‐posterior aspect ratio.

[1]  E Y Chao,et al.  Normal axial alignment of the lower extremity and load-bearing distribution at the knee. , 1990, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[2]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Rotational Landmarks and Sizing of the Distal Femur in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 1996, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  R. S. Francis,et al.  Parameters and comparisons of the quadriceps angle of college-aged men and women in the supine and standing positions , 1992, The American journal of sports medicine.

[4]  E M Badley,et al.  Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  A. Boskey,et al.  Does sex matter in musculoskeletal health? The influence of sex and gender on musculoskeletal health. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  C. Heyde,et al.  Ultrasonographic imaging of fractures of the clavicle in newborn infants. , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[7]  Michael A. Mont,et al.  Anthropometric Measurements of the Human Knee: Correlation to the Sizing of Current Knee Arthroplasty Systems , 2003, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[8]  E. Graves National Hospital Discharge Survey. , 1989, Vital and health statistics. Series 13, Data from the National Health Survey.

[9]  D. Zurakowski,et al.  Intraoperative measurements of male and female distal femurs during primary total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, The journal of knee surgery.

[10]  G. Cerulli,et al.  Patellar pain and incongruence. I: Measurements of incongruence. , 1983, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[11]  G. Cerulli,et al.  Patellar Pain and Incongruence , 1983 .

[12]  N S Laud,et al.  Anthropometric measurements to design total knee prostheses for the Indian population. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[13]  A. Mokdad,et al.  Prevalence of obesity, diabetes, and obesity-related health risk factors, 2001. , 2003, JAMA.

[14]  Christopher Jones Gender differences in patellofemoral joint biomechanics. , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[15]  R. Scott,et al.  The effect of patellar thickness on intraoperative knee flexion and patellar tracking in total knee arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  M. G. Horton,et al.  Quadriceps femoris muscle angle: normal values and relationships with gender and selected skeletal measures. , 1989, Physical therapy.

[17]  R. Gajdosik,et al.  Q angle: effects of isometric quadriceps contraction and body position. , 1994, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.

[18]  L. Livingston,et al.  The quadriceps angle: a review of the literature. , 1998, The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy.