Investigating training, transfer and viewpoint effects resulting from recurrent CBT of X-Ray image interpretation

X-ray screening of passenger bags is an essential task at airport security checkpoints. In this study we investigated how well airport security screeners can detect guns, knives, improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and other threat objects in X-ray images of passenger bags before and after 3 and 6 months of recurrent (about 20 min per week) computer-based training (CBT). Two experiments conducted at different airports gave very similar results. Training with X-ray Tutor (XRT), an individually adaptive CBT, resulted in large performance increases, especially for detecting IEDs. While performance for detecting IEDs was initially substantially lower than for guns, IEDs could be detected as well as guns after several months of training. A large transfer effect was observed as well: Training with XRT helped screeners recognize new threat objects that were similar in shape as the trained objects. Threat recognition was dependent on the rotation of the objects. If depicted from an unusual viewpoint, prohibited items were more difficult to recognize. The results were compared to two conventional (not adaptive) CBT systems. For one system no training and transfer effects were observed whereas small training and transfer effects were found for the other conventional CBT system.

[1]  J. D. Smith,et al.  Specific-token effects in screening tasks: possible implications for aviation security. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  Heinrich H Bülthoff,et al.  Image-based object recognition in man, monkey and machine , 1998, Cognition.

[3]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Three-Dimensional Object Recognition from Single Two-Dimensional Images , 1987, Artif. Intell..

[4]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[5]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Prior experience of rotation is not required for recognizing objects seen from different angles , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Visual object understanding , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[7]  Jonathan C. Roberts,et al.  Graphics and Visualization within Cross-Stitch , 1999 .

[8]  S. Ullman Three-dimensional object recognition based on the combination of views , 1998, Cognition.

[9]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  The role of recurrent CBT for increasing aviation security screeners’ visual knowledge and abilities needed in x-ray screening , 2006 .

[10]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis , 1992 .

[11]  Bernd Kersten Praxisfelder der Wahrnehmungspsychologie , 2005 .

[12]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Assessing X-ray image interpretation competency of airport security screeners. , 2006 .

[13]  Diana Hardmeier,et al.  Aviation Security Screeners Visual Abilities & Visual Knowledge Measurement , 2005 .

[14]  John A. Nevin,et al.  SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY AND OPERANT BEHAVIOR: A Review of David M. Green and John A. Swets' Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics.1 , 1969 .

[15]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  How are three-dimensional objects represented in the brain? , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  S. Kosslyn Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  Eli Peli,et al.  Object Recognition in Man, Monkey and Machine , 1999 .

[18]  M. J. Tarr,et al.  COMMENT ON: IS HUMAN OBJECT RECOGNITION BETTER DESCRIBED BY GEON STRUCTURAL DESCRIPTIONS OR BY MULTIPLE VIEWS ? BY BARTRAM D.J. , 1995 .

[19]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  A statistical approach for image difficulty estimation in x-ray screening using image measurements , 2007, APGV.

[21]  M J Tarr,et al.  Is human object recognition better described by geon structural descriptions or by multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein (1993). , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  Arthur F Kramer,et al.  Visual Skills in Airport-Security Screening , 2004, Psychological science.

[23]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Perceptual Organization and Visual Recognition , 2012 .

[24]  D. Marr,et al.  Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes , 1978, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[25]  A. Schwaninger,et al.  Adaptive Computer-Based Training Increases on the Job Performance of X-Ray Screeners , 2007, 2007 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology.

[26]  I. Biederman,et al.  Dynamic binding in a neural network for shape recognition. , 1992, Psychological review.

[27]  Adrian Schwaninger Training of airport security screeners , 2003 .

[28]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[29]  R Lawson,et al.  Achieving visual object constancy across plane rotation and depth rotation. , 1999, Acta psychologica.

[30]  David L. Sheinberg,et al.  Visual object recognition. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[31]  Adrian Schwaninger,et al.  Evaluation of CBT for increasing threat detection performance in X-ray screening , 2004 .

[32]  A. Saks,et al.  An investigation of training activities and transfer of training in organizations , 2006 .

[33]  M. Tarr Rotating objects to recognize them: A case study on the role of viewpoint dependency in the recognition of three-dimensional objects , 1995, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[34]  W. Hayward After the viewpoint debate: where next in object recognition? , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[35]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[36]  David Loshin Graphics and Visualization , 1994 .

[37]  Heinrich H. Bülthoff,et al.  Object recognition in man, monkey, and machine , 1999 .

[38]  Peter Földiák,et al.  Learning Invariance from Transformation Sequences , 1991, Neural Comput..

[39]  K. Verfaillie Variant points of view on viewpoint invariance. , 1992, Canadian journal of psychology.

[40]  M. Stryker Temporal associations , 1991, Nature.

[41]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.