Facial reconstruction: soft tissue thickness values for South African black females.

In forensic science, investigators frequently have to deal with unidentified skeletonised remains. When conventional methods of identification are unsuccessful, forensic facial reconstruction (FFR) may be used, often as a last resort, to assist the process. FFR relies on the relationships between the facial features, subcutaneous soft tissues and underlying bony structure of the skull. The aim of this study was to develop soft tissue thickness (STT) values for South African black females for application to FFR, to compare these values to existing literature or databases and to add these values to existing population data. Computerised tomography scanning was used to determine average population-specific STT values at 28 facial landmarks of 154 black females. Descriptive statistics are provided for these STT values, which were also compared to those reported in three other comparable databases. Many of these STT values are significantly different from those reported for comparable groups, suggesting that individuals from different geographical areas have unique facial features thus requiring population-specific STT values. Repeatability tests indicated that most measurements could be recorded with a high degree of reliability.

[1]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  Facial Soft Tissue Thicknesses in Australian Adult Cadavers * , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  R E Barsley,et al.  In vivo facial tissue depth measurements for children and adults. , 2000, Journal of forensic sciences.

[3]  Caroline Wilkinson,et al.  Forensic Facial Reconstruction , 2004 .

[4]  L. Ferrante,et al.  Statistical methods to assess the reliability of measurements in the procedures for forensic age estimation , 2009, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[5]  K. Mawatari,et al.  Rapid analysis of methamphetamine in hair by micropulverized extraction and microchip-based competitive ELISA. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[6]  Sanjeev,et al.  Facial soft tissue thickness in northwest Indian adults. , 2008, Forensic science international.

[7]  Peter Petocz,et al.  Learning about statistics and statistics learning , 2002 .

[8]  J. Rhine,et al.  Thickness of facial tissues in American blacks. , 1980, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  R. Ward,et al.  The affect of tissue depth variation on craniofacial reconstructions. , 2007, Forensic science international.

[10]  K. Taylor Forensic Art and Illustration , 2000 .

[11]  K. Reichs Forensic osteology : advances in the identification of human remains , 1998 .

[12]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  Facial Soft Tissue Depths in Craniofacial Identification (Part I): An Analytical Review of the Published Adult Data * , 2008, Journal of forensic sciences.

[13]  Ted A. Rathbun,et al.  Human Identification: Case Studies in Forensic Anthropology , 1984 .

[14]  Sónia Codinha,et al.  Facial soft tissue thicknesses for the Portuguese adult population. , 2009, Forensic science international.

[15]  Jae Bum Lee,et al.  Accuracy of facial soft tissue thickness measurements in personal computer-based multiplanar reconstructed computed tomographic images. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[16]  V M Phillips,et al.  Facial reconstruction: utilization of computerized tomography to measure facial tissue thickness in a mixed racial population. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[17]  W A Aulsebrook,et al.  Facial soft-tissue thicknesses in the adult male Zulu. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[18]  M. Cavalcanti,et al.  Applicability of 3D-CT facial reconstruction for forensic individual identification. , 2003, Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research.

[19]  Paul Suetens,et al.  Computerized craniofacial reconstruction using CT-derived implicit surface representations. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[20]  D. Vandermeulen,et al.  Large-scale in-vivo Caucasian facial soft tissue thickness database for craniofacial reconstruction. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[21]  W A Aulsebrook,et al.  Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. , 1995, Forensic science international.

[22]  Carl N Stephan,et al.  Does sexual dimorphism in facial soft tissue depths justify sex distinction in craniofacial identification? , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.