A Qualitative Study of Knowledge Management: The Multinational Firm Point of View

ABStrAct Knowledge is one of the basic production factors owned by enterprises, and knowledge management is one of the main dynamic capabilities on which enterprises can base their competitive advantages. The creation, transfer, and later use of knowledge have become increasingly important, and multinational corporations (MNCs), being scattered in various places, constitute the appropriate environment to implement knowledge management processes meant to maximize their intellectual assets. This chapter has as its aim to answer three questions: (a) what actions do MNCs undertake in order to set knowledge management processes in motion; (b) what main variables impact on their knowledge creation capability; and (c) what main variables impact on their knowledge transfer ca-pability? A qualitative research work based on a multiple case study has served to achieve that aim, allowing us to carry out an exploratory study of six MNCs which have shown their proactivity in the knowledge management area. The results of the analysis have led to eight propositions which highlight the most relevant variables facilitating the processes for the creation and transfer of knowledge within a MNC.

[1]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[2]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[3]  H. Triandis,et al.  Cultural Variations in the Cross-Border Transfer of Organizational Knowledge: An Integrative Framework , 2002 .

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  David L. Deeds,et al.  THE IMPORTANCE OF INDUSTRY STRUCTURE FOR THE DETERMINATION OF FIRM PROFITABILITY: A NEO-AUSTRIAN PERSPECTIVE , 1996 .

[6]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[7]  Michael H. Zack,et al.  Developing a Knowledge Strategy , 1999 .

[8]  J. Birkinshaw.  How Multinational Subsidiary Mandates are Gained and Lost , 1996 .

[9]  Veronica Hope Hailey,et al.  Managing Change across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices , 2005 .

[10]  Karl M. Wiig,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Introduction and Perspective , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[11]  J. Hamel,et al.  Case Study Methods , 1993 .

[12]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[13]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[14]  R. Grant.  Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[15]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  Locating Adaptive Learning: The Situated Nature of Adaptive Learning in Organizations , 1997 .

[16]  Anil K. Gupta,et al.  Knowledge Flows and the Structure of Control Within Multinational Corporations , 1991 .

[17]  R. Grant.  The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation , 1991 .

[18]  J. Spender.  Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[19]  G. Hedlund.  The hypermodern MNC—A heterarchy? , 1986 .

[20]  Jay R. Galbraith,et al.  Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multinational Organizations. , 1977 .

[21]  Syed Shariq,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Emerging Discipline , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[22]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  The nonsense of knowledge management , 2002, Inf. Res..

[23]  Xi Zhang,et al.  Impact of Structures on Knowledge Contribution in Virtual Organizations: The Asian Case , 2011, Int. J. Asian Bus. Inf. Manag..

[24]  J. V. Maanen,et al.  Toward a theory of organizational socialization , 1977 .

[25]  C. Bartlett,et al.  The Multinational Corporation as an Interorganizational Network , 1990 .

[26]  H. D. Thomas,et al.  SUCCESSFUL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PROJECTS , 1998 .

[27]  P. Drucker.  Post-Capitalist Society , 1993 .

[28]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  BUILDING FIRM-SPECIFIC ADVANTAGES IN MULTINATIONAL CORPORATIONS: THE ROLE OF SUBSIDIARY INITIATIVE , 1998 .

[29]  Sharon O'donnell,et al.  MANAGING FOREIGN SUBSIDIARIES: AGENTS OF HEADQUARTERS, OR AN INTERDEPENDENT NETWORK? , 2000 .

[30]  Paul Almeida,et al.  Are Firms Superior to Alliances and Markets? An Empirical Test of Cross-Border Knowledge Building , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[31]  Nakiye Avdan Boyacıgiller,et al.  The Role of Expatriates in the Management of Interdependence Complexity and Risk in Multinational Corporations , 1990 .

[32]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Differentiated fit and shared values: Alternatives for managing headquarters‐subsidiary relations , 1994 .

[33]  Bruce Kogut,et al.  Knowledge, Market Failure and the Multinational Enterprise: A Reply , 1995 .

[34]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[35]  I. Nonaka,et al.  SECI, Ba and Leadership: a Unified Model of Dynamic Knowledge Creation , 2000 .

[36]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[37]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[38]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Knowledge Creating Company , 2008 .

[39]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Multinational knowledge spillovers with decentralised R&D: a game-theoretic approach , 2007 .

[40]  William D. Guns,et al.  Rethinking Knowledge Work: Creating Value through Idiosyncratic Knowledge , 1997, J. Knowl. Manag..

[41]  Angela Abell,et al.  Skills for the Knowledge Economy: the reality of the market-place , 1999 .

[42]  Darius Mehri.  Engineering Design at a Toyota Company: Knowledge Management and the Innovative Process , 2009 .

[43]  Silke Bender,et al.  The transfer of knowledge and the retention of expertise: the continuing need for global assignments , 2000, J. Knowl. Manag..

[44]  R. Yin.  Yin, Robert K., Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1994. , 1994 .

[45]  Tony S. Frost,et al.  R&D co-practice and ‘reverse’ knowledge integration in multinational firms , 2005 .

[46]  P. Quintas,et al.  Knowledge management: A strategic agenda , 1997 .

[47]  M. Alvesson,et al.  Odd Couple: Making Sense of the Curious Concept of Knowledge Management , 2001 .

[48]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[49]  Karl-Erik Sveiby.  The New Organizational Wealth: Managing and Measuring Knowledge-Based Assets , 1997 .

[50]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Theory and research in strategic management: Swings of a pendulum , 1999 .