Fast and robust 3D recognition by alignment

Alignment is a common approach for recognizing 3-D objects in 2-D images. Current implementations handle image uncertainty in ad hoc ways. These errors, however, can propagate and magnify through the alignment computations, such that the ad hoc approaches may not work. The authors give a technique for tightly bounding the propagated error, which can be used to make the recognition robust while still being efficient. Previous analyses of alignment have demonstrated a sensitivity to false positives. But these analyses applied only to point features, whereas alignment systems often rely on extended features for verifying the presence of a model in the image. A new formula is derived for the selectivity of a line feature. It is experimentally demonstrated using the technique for computing error bounds that the use of line segments significantly reduces the expected false positive rate. The extent of the improvement is that an alignment system that correctly handles propagated error is expected to remain reliable even in substantially cluttered scenes.<<ETX>>

[1]  T. D. Alter 3D Pose from Three Corresponding Points Under Weak-Perspective Projection , 1992 .

[2]  W. Grimson,et al.  Model-Based Recognition and Localization from Sparse Range or Tactile Data , 1984 .

[3]  S. Ullman,et al.  The alignment of objects with smooth surfaces , 1993 .

[4]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Locating Partially Visible Objects: The Local Feature Focus Method , 1980, AAAI.

[5]  Larry S. Davis,et al.  Pose Determination of a Three-Dimensional Object Using Triangle Pairs , 1988, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[6]  R. Bolles,et al.  Recognizing and Locating Partially Visible Objects: The Local-Feature-Focus Method , 1982 .

[7]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  Recognizing 3D objects from 2D images: an error analysis , 1992, Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Olivier D. Faugeras,et al.  HYPER: A New Approach for the Recognition and Positioning of Two-Dimensional Objects , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[9]  Ronen Basri,et al.  The Alignment Of Objects With Smooth Surfaces , 1988, [1988 Proceedings] Second International Conference on Computer Vision.

[10]  A FischlerMartin,et al.  Random sample consensus , 1981 .

[11]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  A Study of Affine Matching With Bounded Sensor Error , 1992, ECCV.

[12]  Radu Horaud,et al.  New Methods for Matching 3-D Objects with Single Perspective Views , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[13]  David W. Jacobs Optimal matching of planar models in 3D scenes , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[14]  T. D. Alter D Pose from 3 Corresponding Points under Weak-Perspective Projection , 1992 .

[15]  Tao D Alter Robust and Efficient 3D Recognition by Alignment , 1992 .

[16]  Todd A. Cass Feature matching for object localization in the presence of uncertainty , 1990, [1990] Proceedings Third International Conference on Computer Vision.

[17]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  On the Sensitivity of the Hough Transform for Object Recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[18]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[19]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[20]  W. Eric L. Grimson,et al.  On the Verification of Hypothesized Matches in Model-Based Recognition , 1991, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..