Environmental Technologies in the European Chemical Industry

The chemical industry has often been accused of being highly responsible for environmental pollution, and chemical firms, before others, have been highly committed to solve environmental problems. In this respect, this paper assesses the contribution of the European chemical industry in developing and promoting the diffusion of environmental technologies, as composed by end-of-pipe, recycling and clean technologies. In so doing, it compares the competitive position of Europe with the US and Japan, and the relative position of European countries. By using different analytical tools (patent analysis, case studies, and Internet analysis), we show that the US have a higher innovative rate in such technologies compared to Europe, and Germany has a higher innovative rate compared to other European countries. We discuss the role played by the introduction of strict environmental standards, and of an articulated environmental policy in these two countries in this respect. The upsurge of a "green industry", with processes of division of labour at the industry level, is discussed as well.

[1]  L. Zhuang,et al.  Legislation for the environment: does it work? ‐ an empirical study into selected UK‐based chemical manufacturing firms , 1997 .

[2]  Ulrik Jørgensen,et al.  Clean technology — Innovation and environmental regulation , 1992, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[3]  Bjørn L. Basberg,et al.  Patents and the measurement of technological change: A survey of the literature☆ , 1987 .

[4]  C. Higman,et al.  Production‐Integrated Environmental Protection , 2000 .

[5]  Lorraine Uhlaner Hendrickson,et al.  Dynamic management of the environmental enterprise: a qualitative analysis , 1997 .

[6]  M. Trajtenberg A Penny for Your Quotes : Patent Citations and the Value of Innovations , 1990 .

[7]  Ashoka Mody,et al.  Innovation and the international diffusion of environmentally responsive technology , 1996 .

[8]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[9]  Luc Soete,et al.  The greening of technological progress: an evolutionary perspective , 1992 .

[10]  Gert Villumsen,et al.  Structural Change in OECD Export Specialisation Patterns: de-specialisation and 'stickiness' , 1998 .

[11]  R. Kemp Environmental policy and technical change , 1997 .

[12]  Madhu Khanna,et al.  EPA's Voluntary 33/50 Program: Impact on Toxic Releases and Economic Performance of Firms , 1999 .

[13]  Bengt-Åke Lundvall,et al.  The Globalising Learning Economy: Implications for Innovation Policy , 1998 .

[14]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries , 1992 .

[15]  J. Hemmelskamp,et al.  Environmental policy instruments and their effects on innovation , 1997 .

[16]  Marco Frey Nuovi strumenti volontari per la gestione della variabile ambiente: ecoaudit ed ecolabel , 1994 .

[17]  S. Colum Gilfillan Invention and the patent system , 1968 .

[18]  S. Godtfredsen,et al.  Ullmann ' s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 2017 .

[19]  D. Price Little Science, Big Science , 1965 .