Constructing Responsibilities for Risk: Negotiating Citizen — State Relationships

The paper examines the ways in which citizens negotiate responsibility in relation to various environmental and technological risks. It focuses on the role of agency and the way that this figures in constructions of relations of responsibility between individuals and institutions. A central argument is that, across the different issue contexts, patterns of perceived agency are crucial to understanding the apparent contradiction in citizens' attributions of role-responsibilities for the management of risk. The empirical basis of the paper is a series of twelve reconvened focus groups conducted at locations around England, giving a total of twenty-four meetings, in which citizens discussed six different areas of technological risk: genetically modified (GM) crops, genetic testing, mobile-phone handsets; mobile-phone masts; radioactive waste; and climate change. The authors highlight the problem of citizen ambivalence towards responsibility, tracing it to perceived tensions affecting both citizen and state performances of responsibility, and conclude by discussing the implications for policy and by outlining an agenda for further research.

[1]  G. M. Johnson,et al.  Understanding Communication Processes in Focus Groups , 1993 .

[2]  Sheila Jasanoff,et al.  IN A CONSTITUTIONAL MOMENT: SCIENCE AND SOCIAL ORDER AT THE MILLENNIUM , 2003 .

[3]  A. Kerr Rights and Responsibilities in the New Genetics Era , 2003 .

[4]  P. Phillimore,et al.  Trust and risk in a German chemical town , 2005 .

[5]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information , 1989 .

[6]  R. Slocum Consumer Citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection Campaign , 2004 .

[7]  W. Leiss,et al.  Risk and Responsibility , 1994 .

[8]  A. Giddens Risk and Responsibility , 1999 .

[9]  Lawrence J. Axelrod,et al.  Perceived ecological risks of global change: A psychometric comparison of causes and consequences☆ , 1996 .

[10]  G. Seyfang Shopping for Sustainability: Can Sustainable Consumption Promote Ecological Citizenship? , 2005 .

[11]  S. Eden,et al.  Individual Environmental Responsibility and its Role in Public Environmentalism , 1993 .

[12]  Stewart Barr,et al.  Conceptualising and analysing household attitudes and actions to a growing environmental problem: Development and application of a framework to guide local waste policy , 2005 .

[13]  S. Hinchliffe,et al.  Helping the earth begins at home The social construction of socio-environmental responsibilities , 1996 .

[14]  Michael Power,et al.  The risk management of everything: rethinking the politics of uncertainty , 2004 .

[15]  Institutionalising non-governmental organisation dialogue at Unilever: framing the public as ‘consumer-citizens’ , 2004 .

[16]  J. Kitzinger The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants , 1994 .

[17]  Andrew D. Walsh Responsibility, Taboos and ‘The Freedom to do Otherwise’ in Ankarana, Northern Madagascar , 2002 .

[18]  Andrew Stirling,et al.  Risk, uncertainty and precaution: some instrumental implications from the social sciences , 2003 .

[19]  A. Kerr,et al.  On Ambivalence and Risk: Reflexive Modernity and the New Human Genetics , 2000 .

[20]  J. Bradbury The Policy Implications of Differing Concepts of Risk , 1989 .

[21]  J. Burgess,et al.  Environmental Communication and the Cultural Politics of Environmental Citizenship , 1998 .

[22]  P. Macnaghten,et al.  Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation , 1997 .

[23]  J. Petts Health, Responsibility, and Choice: Contrasting Negotiations of Air Pollution and Immunisation Information , 2005 .

[24]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  Risk and Recreancy: Weber, the Division of Labor, and the Rationality of Risk Perceptions , 1993 .

[25]  H. Bulkeley Common Knowledge? Public Understanding of Climate Change in Newcastle, Australia , 2000 .

[26]  Karen Bickerstaff,et al.  Risk, Responsibility, and Blame: An Analysis of Vocabularies of Motive in Air-Pollution(ing) Discourses , 2002 .

[27]  Ulrich Beck,et al.  Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk , 1995 .

[28]  Nicholas Frank Pidgeon,et al.  Public Views on Climate Change: European and USA Perspectives , 2006 .

[29]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Wising up : the public and new technologies , 2000 .

[30]  E. Beck-Gernsheim Health and Responsibility: From Social Change to Technological Change and Vice Versa , 2000 .

[31]  Andrew Weyman,et al.  Critical trust: understanding lay perceptions of health and safety risk regulation , 2004 .

[32]  Mediated Communication and the Privatization of Public Problems , 2000 .

[33]  P. Slovic Perception of risk. , 1987, Science.

[34]  B. Wynne Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. , 1992 .

[35]  Branden B. Johnson,et al.  Exploring dimensionality in the origins of hazard-related trust , 1999 .

[36]  S. Jasanoff Science and citizenship: a new synergy , 2004 .

[37]  Jerome R. Ravetz,et al.  The good, the true and the post-modern , 1992 .

[38]  Brian Wynne,et al.  Risk As Globalising "Democratic" Discourse? Framing Subjects And Citizens , 2006 .

[39]  Jacquelin Burgess,et al.  Rationalizing environmental responsibilities: A comparison of lay publics in the UK and the Netherlands , 1996 .

[40]  William R. Freudenburg,et al.  The Social Amplification of Risk: Institutional failure and the organizational amplification of risks: the need for a closer look , 2003 .

[41]  P. Lunt,et al.  Citizens and consumers: discursive debates during and after the Communications Act 2003 , 2007 .