Multi-pathway control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the Caenorhabditis elegans germline.

An important event in the development of the germline is the initiation of meiotic development. In Caenorhabditis elegans, the conserved GLP-1/Notch signaling pathway regulates the proliferative versus meiotic entry decision, at least in part, by spatially inhibiting genes in the gld-1 and gld-2 parallel pathways, which are proposed to either inhibit proliferation and/or promote meiotic development. Mutations that cause constitutive activation of the GLP-1 pathway, or inactivation of both the gld-1 and gld-2 parallel pathways, result in a tumorous germline in which all cells are thought to be proliferative. Here, to analyze proliferation and meiotic entry in wild-type and mutant tumorous germlines, we use anti-REC-8 and anti-HIM-3 specific antibodies as markers, which under our fixation conditions, stain proliferative and meiotic cells, respectively. Using these makers in wild-type animals, we find that the border of the switch from proliferation to meiotic entry is staggered in late-larval and adult germlines. In wild-type adults, the switch occurs between 19 and 26 cell diameters from the distal end, on average. Our analysis of mutants reveals that tumorous germlines that form when GLP-1 is constitutively active are completely proliferative, while tumors due to inactivation of the gld-1 and gld-2 pathways show evidence of meiotic entry. Genetic and time course studies suggest that a third pathway may exist, parallel to the GLD-1 and GLD-2 pathways, that promotes meiotic development.

[1]  T. Schedl,et al.  Analysis of the multiple roles of gld-1 in germline development: interactions with the sex determination cascade and the glp-1 signaling pathway. , 1995, Genetics.

[2]  A. Villeneuve,et al.  Nuclear reorganization and homologous chromosome pairing during meiotic prophase require C. elegans chk-2. , 2001, Genes & development.

[3]  A. Schleiffer,et al.  A Caenorhabditis elegans cohesion protein with functions in meiotic chromosome pairing and disjunction. , 2001, Genes & development.

[4]  7 The Drosophila Ovary: An In Vivo Stem Cell System , 2001 .

[5]  H. Scherthan.  Chromosome behaviour in earliest meiotic prophase , 1997 .

[6]  I. Greenwald,et al.  Interchangeability of Caenorhabditis elegans DSL proteins and intrinsic signalling activity of their extracellular domains in vivo. , 1995, Development.

[7]  D. Hall,et al.  Ultrastructural features of the adult hermaphrodite gonad of Caenorhabditis elegans: relations between the germ line and soma. , 1999, Developmental biology.

[8]  N. Kleckner,et al.  Meiotic chromosomes: integrating structure and function. , 1999, Annual review of genetics.

[9]  B. Alberts,et al.  Studies of nuclear and cytoplasmic behaviour during the five mitotic cycles that precede gastrulation in Drosophila embryogenesis. , 1983, Journal of cell science.

[10]  T. Schedl,et al.  The germline in C. elegans: origins, proliferation, and silencing. , 2001, International review of cytology.

[11]  D. Marshak,et al.  Stem Cell Biology , 2001 .

[12]  S. Forsburg.  Only connect: linking meiotic DNA replication to chromosome dynamics. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[13]  D. Hall,et al.  The establishment of Caenorhabditis elegans germline pattern is controlled by overlapping proximal and distal somatic gonad signals. , 2003, Developmental biology.

[14]  J Kimble,et al.  lag-2 may encode a signaling ligand for the GLP-1 and LIN-12 receptors of C. elegans. , 1994, Development.

[15]  T. Schedl,et al.  Mutations in gld-1, a female germ cell-specific tumor suppressor gene in Caenorhabditis elegans, affect a conserved domain also found in Src-associated protein Sam68. , 1995, Genes & development.

[16]  G. Seydoux,et al.  nos-1 and nos-2, two genes related to Drosophila nanos, regulate primordial germ cell development and survival in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1999, Development.

[17]  K. Yoda,et al.  Alteration of Cell Cycle-dependent Histone Phosphorylations by Okadaic Acid , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  J Kimble,et al.  Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. , 1991, Development.

[19]  J. Kimble,et al.  glp-1 Is required in the germ line for regulation of the decision between mitosis and meiosis in C. elegans , 1987, Cell.

[20]  Raphael Kopan,et al.  Notch signaling: from the outside in. , 2000, Developmental biology.

[21]  A. Villeneuve,et al.  Meiotic Recombination in C. elegans Initiates by a Conserved Mechanism and Is Dispensable for Homologous Chromosome Synapsis , 1998, Cell.

[22]  R. Hawley,et al.  Playing for half the deck: the molecular biology of meiosis. , 2002, Nature cell biology.

[23]  W. Wood.  The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans , 1988 .

[24]  T. C. Evans,et al.  GLP-1 is localized to the mitotic region of the C. elegans germ line. , 1994, Development.

[25]  Tim Schedl,et al.  Control of the proliferation versus meiotic development decision in the C. elegans germline through regulation of GLD-1 protein accumulation , 2004, Development.

[26]  E. Hubbard,et al.  The Caenorhabditis elegans gonad: A test tube for cell and developmental biology , 2000, Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists.

[27]  V. Kodoyianni,et al.  Molecular basis of loss-of-function mutations in the glp-1 gene of Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1992, Molecular biology of the cell.

[28]  J. Thomas,et al.  Thinking about genetic redundancy. , 1993, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[29]  G. Jefferis,et al.  A C. elegans patched gene, ptc-1, functions in germ-line cytokinesis. , 2000, Genes & development.

[30]  J. Kimble,et al.  Genetic regulation of entry into meiosis in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1998, Development.

[31]  E. B. Goodwin,et al.  The STAR protein, GLD‐1, is a translational regulator of sexual identity in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[32]  I. Greenwald,et al.  glp-1 and lin-12, genes implicated in distinct cell-cell interactions in C. elegans, encode similar transmembrane proteins , 1989, Cell.

[33]  M. Nagano.  Germ Line Stem Cells , 2005 .

[34]  Frans E. Tax,et al.  Sequence of C. elegans lag-2 reveals a cell-signalling domain shared with Delta and Serrate of Drosophila , 1994, Nature.

[35]  E Jane Albert Hubbard,et al.  Genetic analysis of Caenorhabditis elegans glp-1 mutants suggests receptor interaction or competition. , 2003, Genetics.

[36]  G. Seydoux,et al.  Dedifferentiation of Primary Spermatocytes into Germ Cell Tumors in C. elegans Lacking the Pumilio-like Protein PUF-8 , 2003, Current Biology.

[37]  T. Schedl,et al.  gld-1, a tumor suppressor gene required for oocyte development in Caenorhabditis elegans. , 1995, Genetics.

[38]  S. Strome,et al.  Synapsis and chiasma formation in Caenorhabditis elegans require HIM-3, a meiotic chromosome core component that functions in chromosome segregation. , 1999, Genes & development.

[39]  R. Waterston,et al.  The Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and Its Genome , 1995, Science.

[40]  T. Schedl,et al.  Germ-line tumor formation caused by activation of glp-1, a Caenorhabditis elegans member of the Notch family of receptors. , 1997, Development.

[41]  M. Wickens,et al.  A regulatory cytoplasmic poly(A) polymerase in Caenorhabditis elegans , 2002, Nature.

[42]  T. C. Evans,et al.  Translational repression of a C. elegans Notch mRNA by the STAR/KH domain protein GLD-1 , 2003, Development.

[43]  T. Schedl,et al.  GLD-1, a cytoplasmic protein essential for oocyte differentiation, shows stage- and sex-specific expression during Caenorhabditis elegans germline development. , 1996, Developmental biology.

[44]  Marvin Wickens,et al.  NANOS-3 and FBF proteins physically interact to control the sperm–oocyte switch in Caenorhabditis elegans , 1999, Current Biology.

[45]  T. Schedl,et al.  Identification of in vivo mRNA targets of GLD-1, a maxi-KH motif containing protein required for C. elegans germ cell development. , 2001, Genes & development.