Quantization techniques for the compression of chest images by JPEG-type algorithms

The Joint Photographic Expert Group (JPEG) compression standard specifies a quantization procedure but does not specify a particular quantization table. In addition, there are quantization procedures which are effectively compatible with the standard but do not adhere to the simple quantization scheme described therein. These are important considerations, since it is the quantization procedure that primarily determines the compression ratio as well as the kind of information lost or artifacts introduced. A study has been conducted of issues related to the design of quantization techniques tailored for the compression of 12-bit chest images in radiology. Psycho-physical based quantization alone may not be optimal for images that are to be compressed and then used for primary diagnosis. Two specific examples of auxiliary techniques which can be used in conjunction with JPEG compression are presented here. In particular, preprocessing of the source image is shown to be advantageous under certain circumstances. In contrast, a proposed quantization technique in which isolated nonzero coefficients are removed has been shown to be generally detrimental. Image quality here is primarily measured by mean square error (MSE), although this study is in anticipation of more relevant reader performance studies of compression.

[1]  Sethuraman Panchanathan,et al.  Comparison of lossy coding techniques for digitized radiographic images , 1990, Medical Imaging.

[2]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  Application of a Noise Adaptive Contrast Sensitivity Function to Image Data Compression , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[3]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Cosine Transform Coding Incorporating Human Visual System Model , 1986, Other Conferences.

[4]  A. Leger,et al.  Still picture compression algorithms evaluated for international standardisation , 1988, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference and Exhibition. Communications for the Information Age.

[5]  G. Wallace,et al.  Subjective testing results for still picture compression algorithms for international standardization , 1988, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference and Exhibition. Communications for the Information Age.

[6]  Russell C. Hardie,et al.  LUM filters for smoothing and sharpening , 1991, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Scott J. Daly,et al.  An Optimized Image Data Compression Technique Utilized In The Kodak Sv9600 Still Video Transceiver , 1989, Photonics West - Lasers and Applications in Science and Engineering.

[8]  Charles G. Boncelet,et al.  Some uses for order statistic filtering in image compression , 1990, Other Conferences.

[9]  I. Sebestyen,et al.  The international standardisation of a still picture compression technique , 1988, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference and Exhibition. Communications for the Information Age.