Experimental study of commercial size proton exchange membrane fuel cell performance

Commercial sized (16 x 16 cm2 active surface area) proton exchange membrane (PEM) fuel cells with serpentine flow chambers are fabricated. The GORE-TEX® PRIMEA 5621 was used with a 35-[mu]m-thick PEM with an anode catalyst layer with 0.45 mg cm-2 Pt and cathode catalyst layer with 0.6 mg cm-2 Pt and Ru or GORE-TEX® PRIMEA 57 was used with an 18-[mu]m-thick PEM with an anode catalyst layer at 0.2 mg cm-2 Pt and cathode catalyst layer at 0.4 mg cm-2 of Pt and Ru. At the specified cell and humidification temperatures, the thin PRIMEA 57 membrane yields better cell performance than the thick PRIMEA 5621 membrane, since hydration of the former is more easily maintained with the limited amount of produced water. Sufficient humidification at both the cathode and anode sides is essential to achieve high cell performance with a thick membrane, like the PRIMEA 5621. The optimal cell temperature to produce the best cell performance with PRIMEA 5621 is close to the humidification temperature. For PRIMEA 57, however, optimal cell temperature exceeds the humidification temperature.

[1]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of serpentine flow field with outlet channel contraction on cell performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2008 .

[2]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of flow channel geometry on cell performance for PEM fuel cells with parallel and interdigitated flow fields , 2008 .

[3]  Minkmas V. Williams,et al.  Influence of Convection Through Gas-Diffusion Layers on Limiting Current in PEM FCs Using a Serpentine Flow Field , 2004 .

[4]  Min Soo Kim,et al.  Experimental study of gas humidification with injectors for automotive PEM fuel cell systems , 2007 .

[5]  T. Henriques,et al.  Increasing the efficiency of a portable PEM fuel cell by altering the cathode channel geometry: A numerical and experimental study , 2010 .

[6]  S. J. Kline,et al.  Describing Uncertainties in Single-Sample Experiments , 1953 .

[7]  H. Toghiani,et al.  Steady state and dynamic performance of proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) under various operating conditions and load changes , 2006 .

[8]  Rong Chen,et al.  Analysis of Mass Transport of Methanol at the Anode of a Direct Methanol Fuel Cell , 2006 .

[9]  Zhongjun Hou,et al.  The voltage characteristics of proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) under steady and transient states , 2008 .

[10]  Horng-Wen Wu,et al.  Numerical predictions of a PEM fuel cell performance enhancement by a rectangular cylinder installed transversely in the flow channel , 2009 .

[11]  Shou-Shing Hsieh,et al.  Channel and rib geometric scale effects of flowfield plates on the performance and transient thermal behavior of a micro-PEM fuel cell , 2007 .

[12]  R. J. Moffat,et al.  Contributions to the Theory of Single-Sample Uncertainty Analysis , 1982 .

[13]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of Flow Channel Area Ratio on Local Transport Characteristics and Cell Performance of 3D PEMFCs , 2007 .

[14]  Amaël Caillard,et al.  Improvement of proton exchange membrane fuel cell electrical performance by optimization of operating parameters and electrodes preparation , 2007 .

[15]  Sirivatch Shimpalee,et al.  Predicting water and current distributions in a commercial-size PEMFC , 2004 .

[16]  Suk Won Cha,et al.  The scaling behavior of flow patterns: a model investigation , 2004 .

[17]  Duu-Jong Lee,et al.  Flow field optimization for proton exchange membrane fuel cells with varying channel heights and widths , 2009 .

[18]  Ay Su,et al.  Study of water-flooding behaviour in cathode channel of a transparent proton-exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[19]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effects of operating temperatures on performance and pressure drops for a 256 cm2 proton exchange membrane fuel cell: An experimental study , 2008 .

[20]  Tianshou Zhao,et al.  A new flow field design for polymer electrolyte-based fuel cells , 2007 .

[21]  Maurizio Cirrincione,et al.  A prototype of a fuel cell PEM emulator based on a buck converter , 2009 .

[22]  Chao-Yang Wang,et al.  Ultra large-scale simulation of polymer electrolyte fuel cells , 2006 .

[23]  Liejin Guo,et al.  Effects of humidification temperatures on local current characteristics in a PEM fuel cell , 2007 .

[24]  Lin Wang,et al.  A parametric study of PEM fuel cell performances , 2003 .

[25]  James Larminie,et al.  Fuel Cell Systems Explained , 2000 .

[26]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES ON OPTIMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS FOR DIFFERENT FLOW FIELD DESIGNS OF PEM FUEL CELLS , 2006 .

[27]  Xianguo Li,et al.  A flow channel design procedure for PEM fuel cells with effective water removal , 2007 .

[28]  Shou-Shing Hsieh,et al.  Characterization of the operational parameters of a H2/air micro PEMFC with different flow fields by impedance spectroscopy☆ , 2006 .

[29]  Soosan Rowshanzamir,et al.  Effects of operating parameters on performance of a proton exchange membrane fuel cell , 2006 .

[30]  Hui Xu,et al.  Analysis of proton exchange membrane fuel cell polarization losses at elevated temperature 120 °C and reduced relative humidity , 2007 .

[31]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Numerical study of cell performance and local transport phenomena in PEM fuel cells with various flow channel area ratios , 2007 .

[32]  Yong Tang,et al.  Experimental investigation of dynamic performance and transient responses of a kW-class PEM fuel cell stack under various load changes , 2010 .

[33]  W. Lehnert,et al.  Development of a stack having an optimized flow field structure with low cross transport effects , 2006 .

[34]  T. Nguyen,et al.  A liquid water management strategy for PEM fuel cell stacks , 2003 .

[35]  Trung Van Nguyen,et al.  A Gas Distributor Design for Proton‐Exchange‐Membrane Fuel Cells , 1996 .

[36]  Qiang Ye,et al.  The role of under-rib convection in mass transport of methanol through the serpentine flow field and its neighboring porous layer in a DMFC , 2006 .

[37]  Fausto Posso,et al.  Modelling and simulation of the utilization of a PEM fuel cell in the rural sector of Venezuela , 2010 .

[38]  Suresh G. Advani,et al.  On the relative influence of convection in serpentine flow fields of PEM fuel cells , 2006 .

[39]  W. Yan,et al.  Effects of operating conditions on cell performance of PEM fuel cells with conventional or interdigitated flow field , 2006 .

[40]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Novel serpentine-baffle flow field design for proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2007 .

[41]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Local transport phenomena and cell performance of PEM fuel cells with various serpentine flow field designs , 2008 .

[42]  Xuan Cheng,et al.  PEM fuel cells operated at 0% relative humidity in the temperature range of 23–120 °C , 2007 .

[43]  Wei-Mon Yan,et al.  Effect of humidity of reactants on the cell performance of PEM fuel cells with parallel and interdigitated flow field designs , 2008 .

[44]  Lin Wang,et al.  Performance studies of PEM fuel cells with interdigitated flow fields , 2004 .

[45]  Lan Sun,et al.  A numerical study of channel-to-channel flow cross-over through the gas diffusion layer in a PEM-fuel-cell flow system using a serpentine channel with a trapezoidal cross-sectional shape , 2006 .

[46]  Hubert A. Gasteiger,et al.  Dependence of PEM fuel cell performance on catalyst loading , 2004 .