CO2 enhancement of forest productivity constrained by limited nitrogen availability

Stimulation of terrestrial plant production by rising CO2 concentration is projected to reduce the airborne fraction of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. Coupled climate–carbon cycle models are sensitive to this negative feedback on atmospheric CO2, but model projections are uncertain because of the expectation that feedbacks through the nitrogen (N) cycle will reduce this so-called CO2 fertilization effect. We assessed whether N limitation caused a reduced stimulation of net primary productivity (NPP) by elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration over 11 y in a free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment in a deciduous Liquidambar styraciflua (sweetgum) forest stand in Tennessee. During the first 6 y of the experiment, NPP was significantly enhanced in forest plots exposed to 550 ppm CO2 compared with NPP in plots in current ambient CO2, and this was a consistent and sustained response. However, the enhancement of NPP under elevated CO2 declined from 24% in 2001–2003 to 9% in 2008. Global analyses that assume a sustained CO2 fertilization effect are no longer supported by this FACE experiment. N budget analysis supports the premise that N availability was limiting to tree growth and declining over time —an expected consequence of stand development, which was exacerbated by elevated CO2. Leaf- and stand-level observations provide mechanistic evidence that declining N availability constrained the tree response to elevated CO2; these observations are consistent with stand-level model projections. This FACE experiment provides strong rationale and process understanding for incorporating N limitation and N feedback effects in ecosystem and global models used in climate change assessments.

[1]  A. Classen,et al.  Net mineralization of N at deeper soil depths as a potential mechanism for sustained forest production under elevated [CO2] , 2011 .

[2]  N. Nelson,et al.  Will photosynthetic capacity of aspen trees acclimate after long-term exposure to elevated CO2 and O3? , 2010, Environmental pollution.

[3]  Colleen M. Iversen,et al.  Digging deeper: fine-root responses to rising atmospheric CO concentration in forested ecosystems. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[4]  Josep Peñuelas,et al.  Global patterns of foliar nitrogen isotopes and their relationships with climate, mycorrhizal fungi, foliar nutrient concentrations, and nitrogen availability. , 2009, The New phytologist.

[5]  C. Schadt,et al.  Assessment of 10 years of CO2 fumigation on soil microbial communities and function in a sweetgum plantation , 2009 .

[6]  Harry T. Valentine,et al.  Optimal Function Explains Forest Responses to Global Change , 2009 .

[7]  Peter B Reich,et al.  Why is plant-growth response to elevated CO2 amplified when water is limiting, but reduced when nitrogen is limiting? A growth-optimisation hypothesis. , 2008, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[8]  R. Norby,et al.  CO2 enrichment increases carbon and nitrogen input from fine roots in a deciduous forest. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[9]  Benjamin Smith,et al.  CO2 fertilization in temperate FACE experiments not representative of boreal and tropical forests , 2008 .

[10]  G. Bonan.  Forests and Climate Change: Forcings, Feedbacks, and the Climate Benefits of Forests , 2008, Science.

[11]  R. Norby,et al.  Nitrogen limitation in a sweetgum plantation: implications for carbon allocation and storage , 2008 .

[12]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2 fertilization and climate variability , 2007 .

[13]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen-use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2 , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[14]  H. Matthews.  Implications of CO2 fertilization for future climate change in a coupled climate–carbon model , 2007 .

[15]  R. Schnur,et al.  Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: Results from the C , 2006 .

[16]  P. Reich,et al.  Nitrogen limitation constrains sustainability of ecosystem response to CO2 , 2006, Nature.

[17]  R. Ceulemans,et al.  Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  R. Norby,et al.  Elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide increases soil carbon , 2005, Global change biology.

[19]  David Joseph Moore,et al.  Contrasting responses of forest ecosystems to rising atmospheric CO2: Implications for the global C cycle , 2005 .

[20]  W. Parton,et al.  Progressive Nitrogen Limitation of Ecosystem Responses to Rising Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide , 2004 .

[21]  R. Norby,et al.  Effects of elevated CO2 on nutrient cycling in a sweetgum plantation , 2004 .

[22]  N. E. Miller,et al.  Fine-root production dominates response of a deciduous forest to atmospheric CO2 enrichment. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  R. Norby,et al.  Persistent stimulation of photosynthesis by elevated CO2 in a sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) forest stand , 2004 .

[24]  R. Norby,et al.  Soil nitrogen cycling under elevated CO2: A synthesis of forest face experiments , 2003 .

[25]  Christopher B. Field,et al.  Nitrogen and Climate Change , 2003, Science.

[26]  R. Norby,et al.  Leaf dynamics of a deciduous forest canopy: no response to elevated CO2 , 2003, Oecologia.

[27]  Stan D. Wullschleger,et al.  Net primary productivity of a CO2-enriched deciduous forest and the implications for carbon storage , 2002 .

[28]  Denis Loustau,et al.  Temperature response of parameters of a biochemically based model of photosynthesis. II. A review of experimental data , 2002 .

[29]  G. Katul,et al.  Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2-enriched atmosphere , 2001, Nature.

[30]  R. Norby,et al.  Allometric determination of tree growth in a CO2‐enriched sweetgum stand , 2001 .

[31]  F. Woodward,et al.  Global response of terrestrial ecosystem structure and function to CO2 and climate change: results from six dynamic global vegetation models , 2001 .

[32]  K. Tian,et al.  Legacies of agriculture and forest regrowth in the nitrogen of old-field soils , 2000 .

[33]  R. McMurtrie,et al.  The decline of forest productivity as stands age : a model-based method for analysing causes for the decline , 2000 .

[34]  J. Nagy,et al.  A free‐air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2 , 1999 .

[35]  Charles T. Garten.  Variation in Foliar 15N Abundance and the Availability of Soil Nitrogen on Walker Branch Watershed , 1993 .

[36]  P. Curtis,et al.  Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles , 1993, Plant and Soil.

[37]  Charles T. Garten,et al.  Litterfall 15N abundance indicates declining soil nitrogen availability in a free-air CO2 enrichment experiment. , 2011, Ecology.

[38]  Charles W. Cook,et al.  Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO(2) enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO(2)] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development. , 2010, The New phytologist.

[39]  S. Schiavon,et al.  Climate change 2007 : the physical science basis : contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[40]  H. L. Miller,et al.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis , 2007 .

[41]  Dale W. Johnson.  Progressive N limitation in forests: review and implications for long-term responses to elevated CO2. , 2006, Ecology.

[42]  R. Norby,et al.  Nitrogen uptake, distribution, turnover, and efficiency of use in a CO2-enriched sweetgum forest. , 2006, Ecology.

[43]  M. Stitt,et al.  Managed Ecosystems and CO2 : Case Studies, Processes and Perspectives , 2006 .

[44]  C. Field,et al.  Atmospheric science. Nitrogen and climate change. , 2003, Science.

[45]  Michael G. Ryan,et al.  Age-Related Decline in Forest Productivity: Pattern and Process , 1997 .