Environmental improvement of product supply chains: proposed best practice techniques, quantitative indicators and benchmarks of excellence for retailers.

Retailers are strategically positioned to leverage environmental improvement over product supply chains through actions targeted at suppliers and consumers. Informed by scientific evidence on environmental hotspots and control points across 14 priority product groups, and a review of 25 major European retailers' actions, this paper proposes a framework to guide and assess retailer best practice in supply chain environmental improvement. Commonly used product standards and improvement measures are classified into "basic" or "good" levels of environmental protection. A hierarchy of eight Best Environmental Management Practices (BEMPs) is proposed to systematically identify and improve the most environmentally damaging supply chains across retail assortments. Widespread third party environmental certification is the most transparent and verifiable mechanism of improvement but may not be appropriate for some supply chains. The enforcement of retailer-defined environmental requirements, and supplier improvement programmes based on performance benchmarking and dissemination of better management practices, are alternative BEMPs that may be used in combination with third party certification. Facilitating consumer selection of frontrunner ecological products is a lower priority BEMP owing to the well documented limitations of this approach. From available data, the highest current or credible-target sales shares of products improved according to the highest priority BEMP and environmental protection level were used to derive "benchmarks of excellence" for each of the 14 product groups. The assessment framework is demonstrated through application to three retailers.

[1]  Javier Ribal,et al.  Measuring and Improving Eco‐efficiency Using Data Envelopment Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Maria Caridi,et al.  Environmental sustainability in fashion supply chains: An exploratory case based research , 2012 .

[3]  K. Green,et al.  Technological Change and the Environmental Impacts of Food Production and Consumption: The Case of the UK Yogurt Industry , 2007 .

[4]  Annik Magerholm Fet,et al.  LCA studies of food products as background for environmental product declarations , 2008 .

[5]  Stefan Seuring,et al.  INTEGRATED CHAIN MANAGEMENT AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS AND ILLUSTRATIVE CASES , 2004 .

[6]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Environmental Impact of Products (EIPRO) Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the final consumption of the EU-25 , 2006 .

[7]  Maj Munch Andersen,et al.  Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: an evidence based view , 2008 .

[8]  Robert J. A. Jones,et al.  Tolerable Versus Actual Soil Erosion Rates in Europe , 2009 .

[9]  S. Van Passel,et al.  Sustainable value assessment of farms using frontier efficiency benchmarks. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[10]  Jose-Luis Galvez-Martos,et al.  Environmental improvement of product supply chains: A review of European retailers’ performance , 2012 .

[11]  A. Hastings,et al.  Cool Farming : Climate impacts of agriculture and mitigation potential , 2008 .

[12]  R. Horne Limits to labels: The role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption , 2009 .

[13]  D. Pimentel,et al.  Environmental, Energetic, and Economic Comparisons of Organic and Conventional Farming Systems , 2005 .

[14]  Timo Kuosmanen,et al.  Measuring Eco‐efficiency of Production with Data Envelopment Analysis , 2005 .

[15]  David B Lobell,et al.  Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Rex,et al.  Beyond ecolabels: what green marketing can learn from conventional marketing , 2007 .

[17]  S. Mann Analysing fair trade in economic terms , 2008 .

[18]  Mike Morris,et al.  Driving environmental certification: its impact on the furniture and timber products value chain in South Africa ☆ , 2004 .

[19]  I. D. Boer,et al.  Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production , 2003 .

[20]  G. Paoli,et al.  CSR, Oil Palm and the RSPO: Translating Boardroom Philosophy into Conservation Action on the Ground , 2010 .

[21]  Stefano Ponte,et al.  Greener than Thou: The Political Economy of Fish Ecolabeling and Its Local Manifestations in South Africa , 2008 .

[22]  K. Lai,et al.  Environmental Supply Chain Cooperation and Its Effect on the Circular Economy Practice‐Performance Relationship Among Chinese Manufacturers , 2011 .

[23]  Nike,et al.  Corporate Responsibility Report , 2004 .

[24]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Towards a harmonised framework methodology for the environmental assessment of food and drink products , 2011 .

[25]  Jane D. Bock DOING THE RIGHT THING? , 2000 .

[26]  S. Vachon,et al.  Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis , 2008 .

[27]  Harald Schoenberger,et al.  Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control in Large Industrial Installations on the Basis of Best Available Techniques - The Sevilla Process , 2009 .

[28]  T. Nemecek,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Swiss farming systems: I. Integrated and organic farming , 2011 .

[29]  Johan F.M. Swinnen,et al.  Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar , 2009 .

[30]  P. Upham,et al.  Carbon labelling of grocery products: public perceptions and potential emissions reductions , 2011 .

[31]  J. Oosterhaven,et al.  Annual Report 2008 , 2009 .

[32]  D. Dubois,et al.  Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic Farming , 2002, Science.