Effect of teaching context and tutor workshop on tutorial skills

Effective faculty development workshops are essential to develop and sustain the quality of faculty's teaching. In an integrated problem-based curriculum, tutors expressed the needs to further develop their skills in facilitating students’ content learning and small-group functioning. Based on the authors’ prior observations that tutors’ performance depends on their teaching context, a workshop was designed not only tailored to the tutors’ needs but also organized within their respective teaching unit. The purposes of this study are (1) to evaluate whether this workshop is effective and improves tutors’ teaching skills, and (2) to assess whether workshop effectiveness depends on tutors’ performance before the workshop and on their teaching unit environment. Workshop effectiveness was assessed using (a) tutors’ perception of workshop usefulness and of their improvement in tutorial skills, and (b) students’ ratings of tutor performance before and after the workshop. In addition, an analysis of variance model was designed to analyse how tutors’ performance before the workshop and their teaching unit influence workshop effectiveness. Tutors judged the workshop as helpful in providing them with new teaching strategies and reported having improved their tutorial skills. Workshop attendance enhanced students’ ratings of tutors’ knowledge of problem content and ability to guide their learning. This improvement was also long-lasting. The workshop effect on tutor performance was relative: it varied across teaching units and was higher for tutors with low scores before the workshop. A workshop tailored to tutors’ needs and adapted to their teaching unit improves their tutorial skills. Its effectiveness is, however, influenced by tutors’ level of performance before the workshop and by the environment of their teaching unit. Thus, to be efficient, the design of a workshop should consider not only individual tutors’ needs, but also the background of their teaching units, with special attention to their internal organization and tutor group functioning.

[1]  D H Dolmans,et al.  A rating scale for tutor evaluation in a problem‐based curriculum: validity and reliability , 1994, Medical education.

[2]  H. Schmidt,et al.  Resolving inconsistencies in tutor expertise research: does lack of structure cause students to seek tutor guidance? , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[3]  L. Wilkerson The next best thing to an answer about tutors' content expertise in PBL , 1994, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[4]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Tutoring in problem‐based learning: a teacher development process , 1994, Medical education.

[5]  A D Oxman,et al.  Changing physician performance. A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. , 1995, JAMA.

[6]  A. Rachlis,et al.  Using faculty and student perceptions of group dynamics to develop recommendations for PBL training , 1995, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[7]  D M Irby,et al.  Models of faculty development for problem-based learning , 1996, Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice.

[8]  D. Kaufman,et al.  Tutoring in problem‐based learning: perceptions of teachers and students , 1996, Medical education.

[9]  J. Vassalli,et al.  The Redesigned Undergraduate Medical Curriculum at the University of Geneva , 1997 .

[10]  A pilot study of faculty development for basic science teachers , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[11]  D M Irby,et al.  Strategies for improving teaching practices: a comprehensive approach to faculty development , 1998, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[12]  C. Vleuten,et al.  Is Tutor Performance Dependent on the Tutorial Group's Productivity?: Toward Further Resolving of Inconsistencies in Tutor Performance , 1999 .

[13]  K. Skeff,et al.  Regional teaching improvement programs for community-based teachers. , 1999, The American journal of medicine.

[14]  N V Vu,et al.  Improvement of tutorial skills: an effect of workshops or experience? , 1999, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  C. Griffith Evidenced-based educational practice: the case for faculty development in teaching. , 2000, The American journal of medicine.

[16]  M. Hewson A theory-based faculty development program for clinician-educators. , 2000, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[17]  M. Hewson,et al.  What's the Use of Faculty Development? Program Evaluation Using Retrospective Self-Assessments and Independent Performance Ratings , 2001, Teaching and learning in medicine.

[18]  C. Vleuten,et al.  Trends in research on the tutor in problem-based learning: conclusions and implications for educational practice and research , 2002, Medical teacher.

[19]  Kerri Pandachuck,et al.  Effectiveness of a Brief Workshop Designed to Improve Teaching Performance at the University of Alberta , 2004, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[20]  K. Skeff,et al.  Faculty development a resource for clinical teachers , 1997, Journal of General Internal Medicine.