Urban Bird Diversity and Landscape Complexity: Species- environment Associations Along a Multiscale Habitat Gradient

For birds in urban environments, the configuration of local habitat within the landscape may be as critical as the composition of the local habitat itself. We examined the relative importance of environmental attributes (e.g., tree cover, composition, and number of tree species) measured at different spatial scales in relation to urban bird species richness and abundance. We expected that some bird species and nesting guilds would have a closer association with landscape-level features (within 1000 m), such as proximity to large forested areas, than with local-scale habitat measures (within 50 m). To investigate this, avian community data were collected at 285 point-count stations in 1997 and 1998 along four roadside transects located in Vancouver and Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. Transects (5-25 km in length) bisected three large parks (>324 ha) and proceeded along residential streets in urban and suburban areas. In total, 48 bird species were observed, including 25 common species. Species richness declined in relation to a gradient of increasing urbanization, as measured by local- and landscape-level habitat features. We further examined the significance and importance of local- vs. landscape- level habitat attributes using logistic regression and found that both scales explained the presence/absence distributions of residential birds. Local-scale habitat features such as large coniferous trees, berry-producing shrubs, and freshwater streams were of particular importance in estimating the likelihood of finding bird species. Landscape measures, particularly forest cover (within 500 m) and park area (measured at different scales as a function of distance from point-count stations) significantly improved likelihood estimations based solely on local-scale habitat features. Our results suggest that both local- and landscape-scale resources were important in determining the distribution of birds in urban areas. Parks, reserves, and the surrounding residential areas should be integrated into urban planning and development designs to maintain resident avifauna and overall species diversity in urban environments.

[1]  Charles M. Francis,et al.  Landscape Context and Fragmentation Effects on Forest Birds in Southern Ontario , 2001 .

[2]  R. L. Knight,et al.  Songbird and Medium‐Sized Mammal Communities Associated with Exurban Development in Pitkin County, Colorado , 2001 .

[3]  L. Fahrig.  How much habitat is enough , 2001 .

[4]  U. Mörtberg.  Resident bird species in urban forest remnants; landscape and habitat perspectives , 2001, Landscape Ecology.

[5]  E. Nol,et al.  LANDSCAPE AND FRAGMENT SIZE EFFECTS ON REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS OF FOREST‐BREEDING BIRDS IN ONTARIO , 2000 .

[6]  W. M. V. Haegen,et al.  Shrubsteppe Bird Response to Habitat and Landscape Variables in Eastern Washington, U.S.A. , 2000 .

[7]  Glenn D. Sutherland,et al.  Scaling of Natal Dispersal Distances in Terrestrial Birds and Mammals , 2000 .

[8]  Jean Thioulouse,et al.  Identification of birds as biological markers along a neotropical urban–rural gradient (Cayenne, French Guiana), using co-inertia analysis , 2000 .

[9]  Dennis E. Jelinski,et al.  THE RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF PATCH AREA AND PERIMETER–AREA RATIO TO GRASSLAND BREEDING BIRDS , 1999 .

[10]  Lily Kong,et al.  Bird use of linear areas of a tropical city : implications for park connector design and management , 1999 .

[11]  S. Rottenborn.  Predicting the impacts of urbanization on riparian bird communities , 1999 .

[12]  Lenore Fahrig,et al.  INDEPENDENT EFFECTS OF FOREST COVER AND FRAGMENTATION ON THE DISTRIBUTION OF FOREST BREEDING BIRDS , 1999 .

[13]  V. Saab.  IMPORTANCE OF SPATIAL SCALE TO HABITAT USE BY BREEDING BIRDS IN RIPARIAN FORESTS: A HIERARCHICAL ANALYSIS , 1999 .

[14]  R. Schweinsburg,et al.  RELATIONSHIPS AMONG BREEDING BIRDS, HABITAT, AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT IN GREATER TUCSON, ARIZONA , 1998 .

[15]  J. Sauer,et al.  A citywide breeding bird survey for Washington, D.C. , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[16]  J. Vandermeer,et al.  The Agroecosystem: A Need for the Conservation Biologist’s Lens , 1997 .

[17]  J. Rotenberry,et al.  Breeding Bird Abundance in an Urbanizing Landscape in Coastal Southern California , 1997 .

[18]  C. Arnold,et al.  IMPERVIOUS SURFACE COVERAGE: THE EMERGENCE OF A KEY ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATOR , 1996 .

[19]  R. Blair.  Land Use and Avian Species Diversity Along an Urban Gradient , 1996 .

[20]  H. Pulliam,et al.  Ecological Processes That Affect Populations in Complex Landscapes , 1992 .

[21]  Donald Ludwig,et al.  Stability, Regulation, and the Determination of Abundance in an Insular Song Sparrow Population , 1992 .

[22]  D. Hosmer,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression , 1991 .

[23]  R. Degraaf.  Winter foraging guild structure and habitat associations in suburban bird communities , 1991 .

[24]  A. D. Geis,et al.  Bird population and habitat surveys in urban areas , 1991 .

[25]  S. Pickett,et al.  Ecosystem Structure and Function along Urban‐Rural Gradients: An Unexploited Opportunity for Ecology , 1990 .

[26]  H. Nix,et al.  Determinants of bird populations in an urban area , 1989 .

[27]  J. Diamond.  Urban extinction of birds , 1988, Nature.

[28]  M. Hill,et al.  Data analysis in community and landscape ecology , 1987 .

[29]  S. Beissinger,et al.  Effects of Urbanization on Avian Community Organization , 1982 .

[30]  E. L. Little,et al.  The Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Trees: Eastern Region@@@Western Region , 1981 .

[31]  W. Rees,et al.  Bird communities and the structure of urban habitats , 1979 .

[32]  Geraldine R. Vale,et al.  Suburban Bird Populations in West-Central California , 1976 .

[33]  John T. Emlen,et al.  An Urban Bird Community in Tucson, Arizona: Derivation, Structure, Regulation , 1974 .

[34]  R. Macarthur,et al.  The Theory of Island Biogeography , 1969 .

[35]  R. Macarthur,et al.  On Bird Species Diversity , 1961 .

[36]  S. Hinsley,et al.  Influences of population size and woodland area on bird species distributions in small woods , 2004, Oecologia.

[37]  K. Er.  Effects of forest loss and fragmentation with urbanization on bird communities in Vancouver , 2002 .

[38]  Clive Goodinson,et al.  Limitations of the point-count method for inferring stand-level species-resource relationships : a sampling simulation approach , 2000 .

[39]  C. Bock,et al.  EFFECTS OF HABITAT AND LANDSCAPE CHARACTERISTICS ON AVIAN BREEDING DISTRIBUTIONS IN COLORADO FOOTHILLS SHRUB , 1998 .

[40]  Scott K. Robinson,et al.  SOURCE-SINK POPULATION DYNAMICS MAY COMPLICATE THE INTERPRETATION OF LONG-TERM CENSUS DATA' , 1996 .

[41]  R. D. Ohmart.  The effects of human-induced changes in the avifauna of western riparian habitats , 1994 .

[42]  R. Baker.  The function of post-fledging exploration: a pilot study of three species of passerines ringed in Britain , 1993 .

[43]  R. J. Smith,et al.  Avian characteristics of an urban riparian strip corridor , 1992 .

[44]  D. Meidinger,et al.  Ecosystems of British Columbia , 1991 .

[45]  Richard S. Dinicola,et al.  Characterization and simulation of rainfall-runoff relations for headwater basins in western King and Snohomish Counties, Washington , 1990 .

[46]  R. R. Johnson,et al.  Conservation of riparian ecosystems in the United States , 1988 .

[47]  Nancy G. Tilghman.  CHARACTERISTICS OF URBAN WOODLANDS AFFECTING BREEDING BIRD DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE , 1987 .

[48]  G. Rosenberg,et al.  VALUE OF SUBURBAN HABITATS TO DESERT RIPARIAN BIRDS , 1987 .

[49]  Kathryn E. Freemark,et al.  Importance of area and habitat heterogeneity to bird assemblages in temperate forest fragments , 1986 .

[50]  W. C. Weber.  Birds in cities : a study of populations, foraging ecology and nest-sites of urban birds , 1972 .