The measurement of active errors: methodological issues

The value of research in any topic area turns on its validity. Patient safety research has revealed—or, at least, given renewed urgency to—a raft of methodological issues. The meaning and thus the value of empirical research in this field is contingent on getting the methodology right. The need for good methods for the measurement of error is necessary whenever an inference is intended and, since inferences lie at the heart of research and management, there is a huge need to understand better how to make measurements that are meaningful, precise, and accurate. In this paper we consider issues relating to the measurement of error and the need for more research.

[1]  J W Peabody,et al.  Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. , 2000, JAMA.

[2]  D. Redelmeier Explaining variations in hospital death rates. , 1991, JAMA.

[3]  R. Goldman,et al.  The reliability of peer assessments of quality of care. , 1992, JAMA.

[4]  D. Rosenhan On being sane in insane places , 1973, Science.

[5]  G. Bechtel,et al.  A continuous quality improvement approach to medication administration. , 1993, Journal of nursing care quality.

[6]  D. Rosenhan On Being Sane in Insane Places , 1973, Science.

[7]  Y. Donchin,et al.  A look into the nature and causes of human errors in the intensive care unit , 2022 .

[8]  R H Brook,et al.  Explaining variations in hospital death rates. Randomness, severity of illness, quality of care. , 1990, JAMA.

[9]  R. Brook,et al.  Hospital inpatient mortality. Is it a predictor of quality? , 1987, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  N. Stanhope,et al.  An evaluation of adverse incident reporting. , 1999, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[11]  Stuart Lipsitz,et al.  The Reliability of Medical Record Review for Estimating Adverse Event Rates , 2002, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[12]  R. Hayward,et al.  Estimating hospital deaths due to medical errors: preventability is in the eye of the reviewer. , 2001, JAMA.

[13]  Jonathan Mant,et al.  Detecting differences in quality of care: the sensitivity of measures of process and outcome in treating acute myocardial infarction , 1995, BMJ.

[14]  J. Mant Process versus outcome indicators in the assessment of quality of health care. , 2001, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[15]  Marie-Dominique Beaulieu,et al.  Using standardized patients to measure professional performance of physicians. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[16]  R. Lilford,et al.  The Leeds University Maternity Audit Project. , 2002, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[17]  R H Brook,et al.  Quality-of-care assessment: choosing a method for peer review. , 1973, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  P. Michel,et al.  L'estimation du risque iatrogène grave dans les établissements de santé en France : les enseignements d'une étude pilote dans la région Aquitaine , 2003 .

[19]  A. Ash Identifying poor-quality hospitals with mortality rates. Often there's more noise than signal. , 1996, Medical care.

[20]  R. Hastie,et al.  The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. , 1993 .

[21]  R. Hayward,et al.  Discussion between reviewers does not improve reliability of peer review of hospital quality. , 2000, Medical care.

[22]  Laura A. Petersen,et al.  Measuring errors and adverse events in health care , 2003, Journal of general internal medicine.

[23]  R. Hayward,et al.  What is an error? , 2000, Effective clinical practice : ECP.

[24]  J. Arnetz,et al.  Validation and application of an instrument for measuring patient relatives' perception of quality of geriatric care. , 2003, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[25]  N. Barber,et al.  What is a prescribing error? , 2000, Quality in health care : QHC.

[26]  Dean Bs Hospital Medication Administration Errors: Their simulation, observation and severity assessment , 1999 .

[27]  D Draper,et al.  Changes in quality of care for five diseases measured by implicit review, 1981 to 1986. , 1990, JAMA.

[28]  T A Brennan,et al.  Reliability and Validity of Judgments Concerning Adverse Events Suffered by Hospitalized Patients , 1989, Medical care.