Systems Analysis of Acoustic Underwater Sensor Networks: A Taxonomy

Underwater seismic and volcanic activity can have catastrophic consequences which are often fatal for human and animal life. Scientists have development instruments to measure the onset of such events and a substantial number of systems are in use around the globe. However, most of these focus on some aspects of detection but are not covering all aspects of detection, measurement, power consumption and data communication. This research aims to evaluate existing frameworks and develop a taxonomy of systems components necessary for a fully functioning comprehensive underwater activity detection system. The proposed framework has sensor, positioning and mobility as main components and is a centralized underwater node localization method using range based multilateral accumulation (RBMAM). The mobility component is used for identification, improvisation and tracking of the position of the sensors, which have been placed under water for the purpose of wireless communication networking and nodes localization to detect the possibilities of seaquakes. This research enhances the underwater localization of the nodes using acoustic wireless sensor networking which through which earlier detection of potential seaquakes could be identified and the location of the nodes could be tracked. The communication underwater will be improved, and accurate results could be achieved for underwater navigation.

[1]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  Effect of vertical seismic motion on the dynamic response and instantaneous liquefaction in a two-layer porous seabed , 2018, Computers and Geotechnics.

[2]  Rutuja Bhusari,et al.  Magnetic induction based cluster optimization in non-conventional WSNs: A cross layer approach , 2018, AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications.

[3]  P. Arumbu,et al.  Sustainable model for high signal to noise ratio to measure underwater acoustic signal using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter , 2018, Comput. Electr. Eng..

[4]  Dan Wang,et al.  Energy efficient distributed compressed data gathering for sensor networks , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[5]  Qilian Liang,et al.  On the uplink outage throughput capacity of hybrid wireless networks with Massive MIMO , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[6]  Seong Oun Hwang,et al.  Connectivity analysis of underground sensors in wireless underground sensor networks , 2018, Ad Hoc Networks.

[7]  Tarachand Amgoth,et al.  Parametric survey on cross-layer designs for wireless sensor networks , 2018, Comput. Sci. Rev..

[8]  Jeong Ho Kim,et al.  Development of low-cost, compact, real-time, and wireless radiation monitoring system in underwater environment , 2018 .

[9]  Azzedine Boukerche,et al.  Connectivity and coverage based protocols for wireless sensor networks , 2018, Ad Hoc Networks.

[10]  Silvia Falchetti,et al.  The impact of covariance localization on the performance of an ocean EnKF system assimilating glider data in the Ligurian Sea , 2018 .

[11]  Zhiguo Sun,et al.  Research into the high-precision marine integrated navigation method using INS and star sensors based on time series forecasting BPNN , 2018, Optik.

[12]  Tahar Ezzedine,et al.  Design of optical and wireless sensors for underground mining monitoring system , 2018, Optik.

[13]  Zhuo Wang,et al.  EODL: Energy Optimized Distributed Localization Method in three-dimensional underwater acoustic sensors networks , 2018, Comput. Networks.

[14]  Edin Omerdic,et al.  Underwater manipulators: A review , 2018, Ocean Engineering.

[15]  P ? ? ? ? ? ? ? % ? ? ? ? , 1991 .

[16]  Dong-Sheng Jeng,et al.  Momentary liquefaction of porous seabed under vertical seismic action , 2018 .

[17]  Bin Sun,et al.  Underwater wireless optical communication using a lens-free solar panel receiver , 2018, Optics Communications.

[18]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[19]  Tsuyoshi Murata,et al.  {m , 1934, ACML.

[20]  Zibouda Aliouat,et al.  Classical and bio-inspired mobility in sensor networks for IoT applications , 2018, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[21]  Joarder Kamruzzaman,et al.  An efficient data delivery mechanism for AUV-based Ad hoc UASNs , 2018, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[22]  Alak Roy,et al.  Effects of Various Factors on Performance of MAC Protocols for Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks , 2018 .

[23]  Danna Zhou,et al.  d. , 1934, Microbial pathogenesis.

[24]  Kai Pan,et al.  Analysis of signal characteristics from rock drilling based on vibration and acoustic sensor approaches , 2018, Applied Acoustics.

[25]  Stefano Basagni,et al.  MARLIN-Q: Multi-modal communications for reliable and low-latency underwater data delivery , 2019, Ad Hoc Networks.

[26]  Jiasong Mu,et al.  An improved AODV routing for the zigbee heterogeneous networks in 5G environment , 2017, Ad Hoc Networks.

[27]  Jian Dong,et al.  Throughput analysis of cognitive wireless acoustic sensor networks with energy harvesting , 2017, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..