Electrophysiological Examination of Embodiment in Vision and Action

A wealth of behavioral data has shown that the visual properties of objects automatically potentiate motor actions linked with them, but how deeply are these affordances embedded in visual processing? In the study reported here, we used electrophysiological measures to examine the time course of affordance resulting from the leftward or rightward orientation of the handles of common objects. Participants were asked to categorize those objects using a left- or right-handed motor response. Lateralized readiness potentials showed rapid motor preparation in the hand congruent with the affordance provided by the object only 100 to 200 ms after stimulus presentation and up to 400 ms before the actual response. Examination of event-related potentials also revealed an effect of handle orientation and response-hand congruency on the visual P1 and N1 components. Both of these results suggest that activity in the early sensory pathways is modulated by the action associations of objects and the intentions of the viewer.

[1]  C F Michaels,et al.  S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[2]  C. Michaels S-R compatibility between response position and destination of apparent motion: Evidence of the detection of affordances. , 1988 .

[3]  S A Hillyard,et al.  Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  M. Coles Modern mind-brain reading: psychophysiology, physiology, and cognition. , 1989, Psychophysiology.

[5]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[6]  S. Luck,et al.  The role of attention in feature detection and conjunction discrimination: an electrophysiological analysis. , 1995, The International journal of neuroscience.

[7]  I. Czigler,et al.  Event-related potential correlates of color selection and lexical decision: hierarchical processing or late selection? , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[8]  Denis Fize,et al.  Speed of processing in the human visual system , 1996, Nature.

[9]  F. Karayanidis,et al.  Evidence of visual processing negativity with attention to orientation and color in central space. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[11]  M. Eimer An event-related potential (ERP) study of transient and sustained visual attention to color and form , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[12]  J. Kenemans,et al.  Feature processing and attention in the human visual system: an overview , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[13]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[14]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[16]  G R Mangun,et al.  Attention and spatial selection: Electrophysiological evidence for modulation by perceptual load , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Visuomotor Priming , 2001 .

[19]  Margaret Wilson,et al.  Six views of embodied cognition , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Robert W. McCarley,et al.  A Topographic Study of ERPs Elicited by Visual Feature Discrimination , 2004, Brain Topography.

[22]  R. Ellis,et al.  Action priming by briefly presented objects. , 2004, Acta psychologica.