Intraspecific ITS Variability in the Kingdom Fungi as Expressed in the International Sequence Databases and Its Implications for Molecular Species Identification

The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of the nuclear ribosomal repeat unit is the most popular locus for species identification and subgeneric phylogenetic inference in sequence-based mycological research. The region is known to show certain variability even within species, although its intraspecific variability is often held to be limited and clearly separated from interspecific variability. The existence of such a divide between intra- and interspecific variability is implicitly assumed by automated approaches to species identification, but whether intraspecific variability indeed is negligible within the fungal kingdom remains contentious. The present study estimates the intraspecific ITS variability in all fungi presently available to the mycological community through the international sequence databases. Substantial differences were found within the kingdom, and the results are not easily correlated to the taxonomic affiliation or nutritional mode of the taxa considered. No single unifying yet stringent upper limit for intraspecific variability, such as the canonical 3% threshold, appears to be applicable with the desired outcome throughout the fungi. Our results caution against simplified approaches to automated ITS-based species delimitation and reiterate the need for taxonomic expertise in the translation of sequence data into species names.

[1]  D. Rizzo,et al.  Intra-specific and intra-sporocarp ITS variation of ectomycorrhizal fungi as assessed by rDNA sequencing of sporocarps and pooled ectomycorrhizal roots from a Quercus woodland , 2007, Mycorrhiza.

[2]  T. Bruns,et al.  Fungal networks made of humans: UNITE, FESIN, and frontiers in fungal ecology. , 2008, The New phytologist.

[3]  Q. Wheeler,et al.  Taxonomic triage and the poverty of phylogeny. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[4]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  Kenji Matsuura,et al.  Reconstructing the early evolution of Fungi using a six-gene phylogeny , 2006, Nature.

[6]  E. Böttger,et al.  Internal Transcribed Spacer Sequencing versus Biochemical Profiling for Identification of Medically Important Yeasts , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[7]  J. Guarro,et al.  Developments in Fungal Taxonomy , 1999, Clinical Microbiology Reviews.

[8]  S. Hinrichs,et al.  Identification of Aspergillus Species Using Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions 1 and 2 , 2000, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[9]  P. Bridge,et al.  The impact of molecular data in fungal systematics , 2005 .

[10]  Izabela Makalowska,et al.  FUSARIUM-ID v. 1.0: A DNA Sequence Database for Identifying Fusarium , 2004, European Journal of Plant Pathology.

[11]  John Bissett,et al.  An oligonucleotide barcode for species identification in Trichoderma and Hypocrea. , 2005, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[12]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Taxonomic Reliability of DNA Sequences in Public Sequence Databases: A Fungal Perspective , 2006, PloS one.

[13]  G. Mueller,et al.  An estimate of the lower limit of global fungal diversity , 2006, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[14]  T. Sugita,et al.  Identification of medically relevant Trichosporon species based on sequences of internal transcribed spacer regions and construction of a database for Trichosporon identification. , 1999, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[15]  M. Hershkovitz,et al.  Deep-level diagnostic value of the rDNA-ITS region. , 1996, Molecular biology and evolution.

[16]  D. Tautz,et al.  A plea for DNA taxonomy , 2003 .

[17]  Michael Weiss,et al.  A higher-level phylogenetic classification of the Fungi. , 2007, Mycological research.

[18]  M. Rupp,et al.  Utilization of the internal transcribed spacer regions as molecular targets to detect and identify human fungal pathogens. , 2002, Medical mycology.

[19]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  galaxie-CGI scripts for sequence identification through automated phylogenetic analysis , 2004, Bioinform..

[20]  A. J. Jones,et al.  At Least 1 in 20 16S rRNA Sequence Records Currently Held in Public Repositories Is Estimated To Contain Substantial Anomalies , 2005, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[21]  D. Hillis,et al.  Ribosomal DNA: Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Inference , 1991, The Quarterly Review of Biology.

[22]  J. Wendel,et al.  Ribosomal ITS sequences and plant phylogenetic inference. , 2003, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[23]  Mark Blaxter,et al.  Defining operational taxonomic units using DNA barcode data , 2005, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[24]  P. Bridge,et al.  On the unreliability of published DNA sequences. , 2003, The New phytologist.

[25]  Richard P. Shefferson,et al.  Evolutionary studies of ectomycorrhizal fungi: recent advances and future directions , 2004 .

[26]  Gaurav Vaidya,et al.  DNA barcoding and taxonomy in Diptera: a tale of high intraspecific variability and low identification success. , 2006, Systematic biology.

[27]  Nils Hallenberg,et al.  Preserving accuracy in GenBank , 2008 .

[28]  Christopher W. Schadt,et al.  Seasonal Dynamics of Previously Unknown Fungal Lineages in Tundra Soils , 2003, Science.

[29]  T. Kuyper,et al.  Uniting Tricholoma sulphureum and T. bufonium. , 2004, Mycological research.

[30]  Sean R. Eddy,et al.  Profile hidden Markov models , 1998, Bioinform..

[31]  T. Sugita,et al.  Identification of Medically RelevantTrichosporon Species Based on Sequences of Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions and Construction of a Database forTrichosporon Identification , 1999, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[32]  A. Sciarrino,et al.  Mutation model for nucleotide sequences based on crystal basis. , 2005, Bio Systems.

[33]  D. Stevenson,et al.  A comparison of algorithms for the identification of specimens using DNA barcodes: examples from gymnosperms , 2007, Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society.

[34]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  Mining metadata from unidentified ITS sequences in GenBank: A case study in Inocybe (Basidiomycota) , 2008, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[35]  R. Turco,et al.  Inter- and intraspecific resolution of nrDNA TRFLP assessed by computer-simulated restriction analysis of a diverse collection of ectomycorrhizal fungi. , 2005, Mycological research.

[36]  D. Hibbett,et al.  Research Coordination Networks: a phylogeny for kingdom Fungi (Deep Hypha) , 2006, Mycologia.

[37]  D. Hawksworth.  The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1.5 million species estimate revisited * * Paper presented at , 2001 .

[38]  T. Sieber,et al.  Intraspecific comparisons of Laetiporus sulphureus isolates from broadleaf and coniferous trees in Europe , 1999 .

[39]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[40]  김삼묘,et al.  “Bioinformatics” 특집을 내면서 , 2000 .

[41]  Jos Houbraken,et al.  Prospects for fungus identification using CO1 DNA barcodes, with Penicillium as a test case , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  Approaching the taxonomic affiliation of unidentified sequences in public databases – an example from the mycorrhizal fungi , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[43]  T. Lott,et al.  Assessment of Ribosomal Large-Subunit D1-D2, Internal Transcribed Spacer 1, and Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 Regions as Targets for Molecular Identification of Medically Important Aspergillus Species , 2005, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[44]  Hsien-Chang Chang,et al.  Identification of Medically Important Yeast Species by Sequence Analysis of the Internal Transcribed Spacer Regions , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[45]  F. Cohan.  What are bacterial species? , 2002, Annual review of microbiology.

[46]  D. Hibbett,et al.  The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom‐forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes) , 2005 .

[47]  T. Bruns,et al.  The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black‐box , 2001, Molecular ecology.

[48]  J. Rosselló,et al.  Better the devil you know? Guidelines for insightful utilization of nrDNA ITS in species-level evolutionary studies in plants. , 2007, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[49]  J. Thompson,et al.  The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[50]  James S Farris,et al.  The full-length phylogenetic tree from 1551 ribosomal sequences of chitinous fungi, Fungi. , 2003, Mycological research.

[51]  Irina S Druzhinina,et al.  TrichoBLAST: a multilocus database for Trichoderma and Hypocrea identifications. , 2005, Mycological research.

[52]  D. Hibbett,et al.  Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. , 2000, Fungal genetics and biology : FG & B.

[53]  B. Dell,et al.  Phylogeography of the ectomycorrhizal Pisolithus species as inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS sequences , 2002 .

[54]  Q. Wheeler,et al.  The perils of DNA barcoding and the need for integrative taxonomy. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[55]  A. Limaye,et al.  Polymorphic Internal Transcribed Spacer Region 1 DNA Sequences Identify Medically Important Yeasts , 2001, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[56]  G. Mueller,et al.  A ‘dirty’ business: testing the limitations of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (TRFLP) analysis of soil fungi , 2006, Molecular ecology.

[57]  T. Bruns,et al.  Detection of plot-level changes in ectomycorrhizal communities across years in an old-growth mixed-conifer forest. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[58]  Robin Sen,et al.  UNITE: a database providing web-based methods for the molecular identification of ectomycorrhizal fungi. , 2005, The New phytologist.

[59]  E. Larsson,et al.  High phylogenetic diversity among corticioid homobasidiomycetes. , 2004, Mycological research.