Teamwork Quality and the Success of Innovative Projects

An extensive body of literature indicates the importance of teamwork to the success of innovative projects. This growing awareness, that "good teamwork" increases the success of innovative projects...

[1]  S Schrader,et al.  Structuring Manufacturer-Supplier Interaction In New Product Development Teams: An Empirical Analysis , 1996 .

[2]  J. Pinto,et al.  Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation , 1993 .

[3]  B. Mullen,et al.  The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration. , 1994 .

[4]  David Wilemon,et al.  Managing the R&D-Marketing Interface , 1987 .

[5]  R. A. Cooke,et al.  The Impact of Group Interaction Styles on Problem-Solving Effectiveness , 1994 .

[6]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[7]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[8]  R. Katz,et al.  Investigating the Not Invented Here (NIH) syndrome: A look at the performance, tenure, and communication patterns of 50 R & D Project Groups , 1982 .

[9]  Quentin W. Fleming,et al.  Integrated project development teams: another fad … or a permanent change , 1996 .

[10]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK TEAM CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: A REPLICATION AND EXTENSION , 1996 .

[11]  J. McGrath.  Social Psychology: A Brief Introduction , 1964 .

[12]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[13]  Anson Seers,et al.  Team-member exchange quality: a new construct for role-making research , 1989 .

[14]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  Interdepartmental Interdependence and Coordination: The Case of the Design/Manufacturing Interface , 1995 .

[15]  J. Levine,et al.  Progress in Small Group Research , 1990 .

[16]  Gina J. Medsker,et al.  RELATIONS BETWEEN WORK GROUP CHARACTERISTICS AND EFFECTIVENESS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DESIGNING EFFECTIVE WORK GROUPS , 1993 .

[17]  L. James,et al.  Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. , 1984 .

[18]  Eduardo Salas,et al.  The Measurement of Team Process , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[19]  J. R. Larson,et al.  Group Goals, Group Coordination, and Group Member Motivation , 1993 .

[20]  A. Parasuraman,et al.  Marketing/R&D Interaction in New Product Development: Implications for New Product Success Rates , 1990 .

[21]  O. Hauptman,et al.  The influence of process concurrency on project outcomes in product development: an empirical study of cross-functional teams , 1996 .

[22]  Dennis J. Devine,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Cohesion and Performance , 1995 .

[23]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[24]  D. L. Gladstein.  Groups in context: A model of task group effectiveness. , 1984 .

[25]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Control of Halo Error: A Multiple Regression Approach , 1985 .

[26]  E. Sundstrom,et al.  Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. , 1990 .

[27]  Deborah G. Ancona,et al.  Beyond Task and Maintenance , 1988 .

[28]  E. Salas,et al.  Team building and its influence on team effectiveness: An examination of conceptual and empirical developments. , 1992 .

[29]  D. Tjosvold.  Cooperation Theory and Organizations , 1984 .

[30]  L. James.  Aggregation Bias in Estimates of Perceptual Agreement. , 1982 .

[31]  D. Denison,et al.  From Chimneys to Cross-Functional Teams: Developing and Validating a Diagnostic Model , 1996 .

[32]  Gerald E. Ledford,et al.  A Predictive Model of Self-Managing Work Team Effectiveness , 1996 .

[33]  J. Hackman,et al.  The design of work teams , 1987 .

[34]  L. Weingart.  Impact of group goals, task component complexity, effort, and planning on group performance , 1992 .

[35]  C. Alderfer.  An Intergroup Perspective on Group Dynamics. , 1983 .