OBJECTIVES
To determine the type of electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation instruction in emergency medicine (EM) residency programs, the use and perceived value of teaching modalities and resources, and the methods used to assess competency of ECG interpretation.
METHODS
An interactive survey instrument was posted on the Internet using SurveySuite, Inc., software and e-mailed to program directors (PDs) of all 125 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved U.S. EM residency programs. Responses are reported in total numbers and percentages.
RESULTS
Ninety-nine of 125 PDs completed the online survey (response rate, 79.2%). Emergency department instruction (99%), case-based lectures (98%), and didactic lectures (98%) were most commonly used to teach interpretation of ECGs, followed by computer-based instruction (34%) and ECG laboratory (12%). The majority of programs (53%) spent more than eight hours on formal ECG lectures per year, while 11% spent less than three hours. Observation during clinical time (99%), lecture time (76%), and hypothetical cases (57%) were the most common ways to determine competency in reading ECGs, while clinical observation and hypothetical cases were perceived as the most valuable. The most commonly used resource was personal or departmental ECG files (91%), and this had the highest perceived value. The majority of PDs were comfortable with residents' abilities to read ECGs by the third year (96%) and fourth year (91%) of residency.
CONCLUSIONS
These data suggest that EM PDs believe that EM residency is adequately preparing graduates to interpret ECGs. This goal is achieved through a variety of methods.
[1]
A. Sanders,et al.
The status of bedside ultrasonography training in emergency medicine residency programs.
,
2003,
Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.
[2]
T O Stair,et al.
Litigation against the emergency physician: common features in cases of missed myocardial infarction.
,
1989,
Annals of emergency medicine.
[3]
K. Todd,et al.
Effect of cardiologist ECG review on emergency department practice.
,
1996,
Annals of Emergency Medicine.
[4]
J. Hoffman,et al.
Quality assurance in the emergency department: evaluation of the ECG review process.
,
1992,
Annals of emergency medicine.
[5]
Robert Woolard,et al.
Missed Diagnoses of Acute Cardiac Ischemia in the Emergency Department
,
2000
.
[6]
M. Gratton,et al.
Emergency department interpretation of electrocardiograms.
,
1992,
Annals of emergency medicine.