Open source development: a hybrid in innovation and management theory

This paper addresses innovations based on open source or non‐proprietary knowledge. Viewed through the lens of private property theory, such agency appears to be a true anomaly. However, by a further turn of the theoretical kaleidoscope, we will show that there may be perfectly justifiable reasons for not regarding open source innovations as anomalies. The paper is based on three sectorial and generic cases of open source innovation, which is an offspring of contemporary theory made possible by combining elements of the model of private agency with those of the model of collective agency. In closing, the paper addresses implications for further research, practitioners and other policy‐makers.

[1]  I. MacMillan,et al.  Resource Cooptation Via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures , 1990 .

[2]  D. Teece.  Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[3]  G. Marwell,et al.  THE PARADOX OF GROUP SIZE IN COLLECTIVE ACTION: A THEORY OF THE CRITICAL MASS. II. * , 1988 .

[4]  A. Lewin,et al.  Prolegomena on Coevolution: a Framework for Research on Strategy and New Organizational Forms , 1999 .

[5]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[6]  S. Barley.  Technicians in the Workplace: Ethnographic Evidence for Bringing Work into Organizational Studies , 1996 .

[7]  Sebastiano Brusco.  The Emilian model: productive decentralisation and social integration , 1982 .

[8]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[10]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Comparing motivations of individual programmers and firms to take part in the open source movement: From community to business , 2006 .

[11]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Measuring competence?: exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research , 1994 .

[12]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[13]  Justin P. Johnson.  Open Source Software: Private Provision of a Public Good , 2002 .

[14]  J. Gerberding.  Faster... but fast enough? Responding to the epidemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  Eric A. von Hippel,et al.  How Open Source Software Works: 'Free' User-to-User Assistance? , 2000 .

[16]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The Economics Of Technological Clubs , 1992 .

[17]  Magnus Bergquist,et al.  The power of gifts: organizing social relationships in open source communities , 2001, Inf. Syst. J..

[18]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[19]  Stefan Haefliger,et al.  Collective Action And Communal Resources in Open Source Software Development: The Case of Freenet , 2003 .

[20]  Amalya L. Oliver,et al.  Social Networks, Learning, and Flexibility: Sourcing Scientific Knowledge in New Biotechnology Firms , 1994 .

[21]  Peter B. Meyer,et al.  Episodes of Collective Invention , 2003 .

[22]  P. Oliver.  Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives for Collective Action: Theoretical Investigations , 1980, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[24]  Ilkka Tuomi,et al.  Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet , 2002 .

[25]  Jay B. Barney,et al.  Research notes and communications management objectives in mergers and acquisitions , 1990 .

[26]  R. Merton,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1975, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.

[27]  Gavin J. Wright.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[28]  K. Cook,et al.  The Distribution of Power in Exchange Networks: Theory and Experimental Results , 1983, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  J. Tirole,et al.  Some Simple Economics of Open Source , 2002 .

[30]  T. R. Madanmohan,et al.  Roles and Knowledge Management in Online Technology Communities: An Ethnography Study , 2002, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[31]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[32]  Steven Levy,et al.  Hackers: Heroes of the Computer Revolution , 1984 .

[33]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Open Source Software and the "Private-Collective" Innovation Model: Issues for Organization Science , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[34]  Dorothy Leonard-Barton,et al.  Developer-User Interaction and User Satisfaction in Internal Technology Transfer , 1993 .

[35]  Sarah Granger,et al.  The hacker ethic , 1994, ECA '94.

[36]  Marco Weiss,et al.  Open Source as a Signalling Device - An Economic Analysis , 2003 .

[37]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[38]  P. Krugman.  Geography and Trade , 1992 .

[39]  J. M. Buchanan,et al.  An Economic Theory of Clubs , 1965 .

[40]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[41]  Andrea Bonaccorsi,et al.  Why Open Source Software Can Succeed , 2003 .

[42]  Howard Rheingold,et al.  The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 2000 .

[43]  J. Tirole,et al.  The Open Source Movement: Key Research Questions , 2001 .

[44]  Sidney C. Sufrin,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups. , 1966 .

[45]  Cristiano Antonelli,et al.  The Evolution of the Industrial Organisation of the Production of Knowledge , 1999 .

[46]  Giovan Francesco Lanzara,et al.  The Knowledge Ecology of Open-Source Software Projects , 2003 .

[47]  Giampaolo Garzarelli,et al.  Open source software and the economics of organization , 2003 .

[48]  Siobhan O’Mahony.  Guarding the commons: how community managed software projects protect their work , 2003 .

[49]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[50]  Taghi M. Khoshgoftaar,et al.  Cost-Benefit Analysis of Software Quality Models , 2004, Software Quality Journal.

[51]  Ii William F. Shughart.  Logic of Collective Action , 2004 .

[52]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[53]  B. Kogut,et al.  Open-source Software Development and Distributed Innovation , 2001 .

[54]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  Knowledge‐intensive entrepreneurship and human capital , 2003 .

[55]  J. Brown,et al.  Organizational Learning and Communities-of-Practice: Toward a Unified View of Working, Learning, and Innovation , 1991 .

[56]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[57]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On limiting or encouraging rivalry in technical progress: The effect of patent scope decisions , 1994 .

[58]  Greg Perkins.  Culture Clash and the Road to World Domination , 1999, IEEE Softw..

[59]  Alessandro Nuvolari,et al.  Collective Invention during the British Industrial Revolution The Case of the Cornish Pumping Engine , 2004 .

[60]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[61]  Bertram C. Bruce,et al.  Emerging communities of practice: collaboration and communication in action research , 2000 .

[62]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Working for Free? Motivations for Participating in Open-Source Projects , 2002, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[63]  B. Lundvall,et al.  The Learning Economy , 1994 .

[64]  F. Blackler.  Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organizations: An Overview and Interpretation , 1995 .

[65]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[66]  Allen J. Scott,et al.  The wealth of regions , 1995 .

[67]  Robert Costanza,et al.  What is ecological economics , 1989 .