Evaluation of recycled asphalt pavement using economic, environmental, and energy metrics based on long-term pavement performance sections

Recycled materials have been used in roadway construction for years. Recently, with the advancement of material processing equipment and mix design technologies involving Recycled Asphalt Pavement (RAP), RAP’s use in pavement construction is increasing. RAP’s various desirable properties spur its use in sustainable development. These merits include energy conservation in mix production, cost savings in material consumption, and environmental protection. Although asphalt mix is considered to be recyclable – meaning RAP could be a sustainable material – in-depth studies verifying and quantifying its effectiveness are limited in the literature. Based on real-world data from pavements constructed with 35% RAP and virgin mixes, this study comprehensively evaluates the sustainability of RAP from three different aspects including cost, energy, and environment. The life cycle cost analysis based on RealCost and life cycle assessment based on PaLATE is used to compare RAP and virgin alternatives. The results suggest that using RAP is more economically efficient and environmentally viable than virgin pavement if thin asphalt overlay is involved. The findings of this study support RAP’s use in current pavement rehabilitation practice, which usually involves relatively thin asphalt overlays.

[1]  Edward T. Harrigan,et al.  NAtioNAl CooperAtive HigHwAy reseArCH progrAm , 2013 .

[2]  Arpad Horvath,et al.  Environmental policy for long-life pavements , 2011 .

[3]  Michael D. Lepech,et al.  Dynamic Life-Cycle Modeling of Pavement Overlay Systems: Capturing the Impacts of Users, Construction, and Roadway Deterioration , 2010 .

[4]  Final Document,et al.  Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design OF NEW AND REHABILITATED PAVEMENT STRUCTURES FINAL DOCUMENT APPENDIX QQ : STRUCTURAL RESPONSE MODELS FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS NCHRP , 2004 .

[5]  A. Horvath,et al.  Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains , 2009 .

[6]  A. T. Papagiannakis,et al.  Optimization of traffic data collection for specific pavement design applications. , 2006 .

[7]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: Critical review , 2011 .

[8]  Tien Fang Fwa,et al.  PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE AND LIFE-CYCLE COST ANALYSIS , 1991 .

[9]  Christopher John Robinette,et al.  Energy, Emissions, Material Conservation, and Prices Associated with Construction, Rehabilitation, and Material Alternatives for Flexible Pavement , 2010 .

[10]  Agnès Jullien,et al.  Environmental Impact of a Binding Course Pavement Section, with Asphalt Recycled at Varying Rates , 2008 .

[11]  Eric Masanet,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of pavements Part II: Filling the research gaps , 2011 .

[12]  Dar-Hao Chen,et al.  Long-Term Performance Evaluation of Recycled Asphalt Pavement Results from Texas , 2010 .

[13]  John A. Gambatese,et al.  Energy Consumption of Asphalt and Reinforced Concrete Pavement Materials and Construction , 2005 .

[14]  J Walls,et al.  Life-Cycle Cost Analysis in Pavement Design — Interim Technical Bulletin , 1998 .

[15]  Mitja Jurgele Life cycle cost analysis in pavement design , 2013 .