Erratum to: Evaluation of BLAST-based edge-weighting metrics used for homology inference with the Markov Clustering algorithm

Clustering protein sequences according to inferred homology is a fundamental step in the analysis of many large data sets. Since the publication of the Markov Clustering (MCL) algorithm in 2002, it has been the centerpiece of several popular applications. Each of these approaches generates an undirected graph that represents sequences as nodes connected to each other by edges weighted with a BLAST-based metric. MCL is then used to infer clusters of homologous proteins by analyzing these graphs. The various approaches differ only by how they weight the edges, yet there has been very little direct examination of the relative performance of alternative edge-weighting metrics. This study compares the performance of four BLAST-based edge-weighting metrics: the bit score, bit score ratio (BSR), bit score over anchored length (BAL), and negative common log of the expectation value (NLE). Performance is tested using the Extended CEGMA KOGs (ECK) database, which we introduce here. All metrics performed similarly when analyzing full-length sequences, but dramatic differences emerged as progressively larger fractions of the test sequences were split into fragments. The BSR and BAL successfully rescued subsets of clusters by strengthening certain types of alignments between fragmented sequences, but also shifted the largest correct scores down near the range of scores generated from spurious alignments. This penalty outweighed the benefits in most test cases, and was greatly exacerbated by increasing the MCL inflation parameter, making these metrics less robust than the bit score or the more popular NLE. Notably, the bit score performed as well or better than the other three metrics in all scenarios. The results provide a strong case for use of the bit score, which appears to offer equivalent or superior performance to the more popular NLE. The insight that MCL-based clustering methods can be improved using a more tractable edge-weighting metric will greatly simplify future implementations. We demonstrate this with our own minimalist Python implementation: Porthos, which uses only standard libraries and can process a graph with 25 m + edges connecting the 60 k + KOG sequences in half a minute using less than half a gigabyte of memory.

[1]  John H. Morris,et al.  Improving the quality of protein similarity network clustering algorithms using the network edge weight distribution , 2011, Bioinform..

[2]  Ole Kristian Ekseth,et al.  orthAgogue: an agile tool for the rapid prediction of orthology relations , 2014, Bioinform..

[3]  Jian Wang,et al.  The Genome Sequence of the Malaria Mosquito Anopheles gambiae , 2002, Science.

[4]  D. Lipman,et al.  A genomic perspective on protein families. , 1997, Science.

[5]  Jacques Ravel,et al.  Visualization of comparative genomic analyses by BLAST score ratio , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[6]  Fabienne Thomarat,et al.  Genome sequence and gene compaction of the eukaryote parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi , 2001, Nature.

[7]  Keith Bradnam,et al.  CEGMA: a pipeline to accurately annotate core genes in eukaryotic genomes , 2007, Bioinform..

[8]  B. Barrell,et al.  Life with 6000 Genes , 1996, Science.

[9]  Andrew Smith Genome sequence of the nematode C-elegans: A platform for investigating biology , 1998 .

[10]  P. Shannon,et al.  Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. , 2003, Genome research.

[11]  J. V. Moran,et al.  Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. , 2001, Nature.

[12]  Christian E. V. Storm,et al.  Automatic clustering of orthologs and in-paralogs from pairwise species comparisons. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  E. Koonin Orthologs, Paralogs, and Evolutionary Genomics 1 , 2005 .

[14]  Trey Ideker,et al.  Cytoscape 2.8: new features for data integration and network visualization , 2010, Bioinform..

[15]  Jeff Shrager,et al.  Chlamydomonas reinhardtii at the Crossroads of Genomics , 2003, Eukaryotic Cell.

[16]  J. Gregory Caporaso,et al.  The large-scale blast score ratio (LS-BSR) pipeline: a method to rapidly compare genetic content between bacterial genomes , 2014, PeerJ.

[17]  Darren A. Natale,et al.  The COG database: an updated version includes eukaryotes , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[18]  E. Koonin,et al.  Orthology, paralogy and proposed classification for paralog subtypes. , 2002, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[19]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  An efficient algorithm for large-scale detection of protein families. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[20]  Ning Ma,et al.  BLAST+: architecture and applications , 2009, BMC Bioinformatics.

[21]  E. Myers,et al.  Basic local alignment search tool. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  J. Lake,et al.  Genomic evidence for two functionally distinct gene classes. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Li Li,et al.  ToxoDB: accessing the Toxoplasma gondii genome , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[24]  Stephen M. Mount,et al.  The genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster. , 2000, Science.

[25]  Paul Richardson,et al.  The Draft Genome of Ciona intestinalis: Insights into Chordate and Vertebrate Origins , 2002, Science.

[26]  C. Stoeckert,et al.  OrthoMCL: identification of ortholog groups for eukaryotic genomes. , 2003, Genome research.

[27]  B. Barrell,et al.  The genome sequence of Schizosaccharomyces pombe , 2002, Nature.

[28]  László Szilágyi,et al.  A fast hierarchical clustering algorithm for large-scale protein sequence data sets , 2014, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[29]  Alberto Paccanaro,et al.  Spectral clustering of protein sequences , 2006, Nucleic Acids Research.

[30]  The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana , 2000, Nature.