Optimal integration of nuclear energy and water management into the oil sands operations

An energy optimization model is presented that includes nuclear energy and water management into the oil sands industry. The proposed model determines the most suitable configuration of energy commodities and oil producers for a given oil production scenario at minimum cost while meeting environmental constraints. The proposed model was validated using data reported in the literature for the future oil sands operations in 2030. Likewise, the proposed integrated energy optimization model was used to determine the 2030 oil sands operations using recent information reported in the literature. The results show that the energy model is a practical tool that can be used to evaluate future oil production scenarios, identify the key parameters that affect the oil sands operations, and can also be used for planning and scheduling of the energy and oil producers for this industry. © 2012 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 2012

[1]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Energy Optimization Model with CO2-Emission Constraints for the Canadian Oil Sands Industry , 2008 .

[2]  E. W. Allen.  Process water treatment in Canada’s oil sands industry: I. Target pollutants and treatment objectives , 2008 .

[3]  Francisco E. Torres.  Linearization of mixed-integer products , 1991, Math. Program..

[4]  M. Ventosa,et al.  Electricity market modeling trends , 2005 .

[5]  I. Grossmann,et al.  Relaxation strategy for the structural optimization of process flow sheets , 1987 .

[6]  Muhittin Oral,et al.  A Linearization Procedure for Quadratic and Cubic Mixed-Integer Problems , 1992, Oper. Res..

[7]  D. R. Simbeck,et al.  Hydrogen costs with CO2 capture , 2005 .

[8]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Technoeconomic evaluation of IGCC power plants for CO2 avoidance , 2006 .

[9]  Ali Elkamel,et al.  Modeling the energy demands and greenhouse gas emissions of the Canadian oil sands industry , 2007 .

[10]  John Davison,et al.  Performance and costs of power plants with capture and storage of CO2 , 2007 .

[11]  Timothy S. Margulies.  Risk optimization: siting of nuclear power electricity generating units , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[12]  Peter W. Glynn,et al.  Dynamic modeling of the tradeoff between productivity and safety in critical engineering systems , 2004, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Edward S. Rubin,et al.  Comparative assessments of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage , 2005 .

[14]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  An outer-approximation algorithm for a class of mixed-integer nonlinear programs , 1986, Math. Program..

[15]  D. Simbeck,et al.  Hydrogen Supply: Cost Estimate for Hydrogen Pathways--Scoping Analysis, January 22, 2002--July 22, 2002 , 2002 .

[16]  Louis Eeckhoudt,et al.  Risk aversion and the external cost of a nuclear accident , 2000 .

[17]  R. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part B: Economic analysis , 2005 .

[18]  Robert H. Williams,et al.  Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: Performance and emissions , 2005 .