Utilization of information technology: examining cognitive and experiential factors of post-adoption behavior

This paper investigates factors affecting the post-adoption behavior of first-tier supply chain members within the U.S. automotive industry toward a new information technology. This paper examined a specialized information technology known as the collaborative visibility network (CVN) used within the U.S. automotive industry that provides enhanced part-level visibility to its supply chain affiliates. Using existing research on innovation diffusion, this paper examines cognitive and experiential antecedents of post-adoption behavior. A model grounded in innovation diffusion theory, social learning theory, and the technology acceptance model is proposed and tested. Field interviews followed by a mail survey were used to collect data from 515 first-tier supply chain users of CVN. A structural equation model tested the hypothesized relationships to support the proposed model. Results confirmed the majority of the hypotheses. The opportunity to experiment, training effectiveness, prior experience with a similar technology, and prior technological knowledge have an effect on perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness, which ultimately affect technology performance. Implications of this study along with suggestions for future research are provided.

[1]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  A Motivational Model of Microcomputer Usage , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[2]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research , 1977 .

[3]  James T. C. Teng,et al.  The Relationship of Information System Training Methods and Cognitive Ability to End-User Satisfaction, Comprehension, and Skill Transfer: A Longitudinal Field Study , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  V. Grover.  An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer‐based Interorganizational Systems* , 1993 .

[5]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[6]  William J. Doll,et al.  The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction , 1988, MIS Q..

[7]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[8]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Consumer Behavior and Marketing Strategy , 1990 .

[10]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF TRAINING METHOD AND TRAINEE AGE ON THE ACQUISITION OF COMPUTER SKILLS , 1988 .

[11]  M. Molesworth,et al.  Buying cars online: the adoption of the web for high-involvement, high-cost purchases , 2002 .

[12]  I. M. Jawahar,et al.  The Influence of Dispositional Factors and Situational Constraints on End User Performance: A Replication and Extension , 2002, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[13]  Wujin Chu,et al.  Industrial Purchasing: An Empirical Exploration of the Buyclass Framework , 1987 .

[14]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beta Versus VHS and the Acceptance of Electronic Brainstorming Technology , 2004, MIS Q..

[15]  J. S. Long,et al.  Testing Structural Equation Models , 1993 .

[16]  B. Byrne.  Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming , 1998 .

[17]  J. H. Steiger.  Structural Model Evaluation and Modification: An Interval Estimation Approach. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  Kar Yan Tam,et al.  Determinants of User Acceptance of Digital Libraries: An Empirical Examination of Individual Differences and System Characteristics , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[19]  Murugan Anandarajan,et al.  Academic vs. practitioner systems planning and analysis , 2004, CACM.

[20]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  Determinants and outcomes of electronic data interchange diffusion , 1995 .

[22]  Larry J. LeBlanc,et al.  Adoption of electronic data interchange: the role of buyer-supplier relationships , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[23]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The Relative Importance of Perceived Ease of Use in IS Adoption: A Study of E-Commerce Adoption , 2000, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Varun Grover,et al.  The Initiation, Adoption, and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S. Organizations , 1993, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  P. Bentler,et al.  Significance Tests and Goodness of Fit in the Analysis of Covariance Structures , 1980 .

[26]  R. MacCallum,et al.  The Need for Alternative Measures of Fit in Covariance Structure Modeling. , 1990, Multivariate behavioral research.

[27]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[28]  James Reardon,et al.  Integrating Business Technology and Marketing Education: Enhancing the Diffusion Process through Technology Champions , 2001 .

[29]  Martin D. Goslar,et al.  Marketing and the adoption of microcomputers: An application of diffusion theory , 1987 .

[30]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Influence of Experience on Personal Computer Utilization: Testing a Conceptual Model , 1994, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[31]  R. Zmud.  Diffusion of Modern Software Practices: Influence of Centralization and Formalization , 1982 .

[32]  James C. Brancheau,et al.  Adoption and Utilization of Commercial Software Packages: Exploring Utilization Equilibria, Transitions, Triggers, and Tracks , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[33]  E. Kelloway.  Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher′s Guide , 1998 .

[34]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  Investigating Determinants of Software Developers' Intentions to Follow Methodologies , 2003, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[35]  Peter M. Bentler,et al.  Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling. , 1995 .

[36]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of TAM and trust , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[37]  Lisa M. Ellram,et al.  Factors that drive purchasing and supply management's use of information technology , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[38]  A. Markman,et al.  Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products , 2001 .

[39]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model with task-technology fit constructs , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[40]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[41]  D. Campbell,et al.  Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. , 1959, Psychological bulletin.

[42]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Why Don't Men Ever Stop to Ask for Directions? Gender, Social Influence, and Their Role in Technology Acceptance and Usage Behavior , 2000, MIS Q..

[43]  Geoffry S. Howard,et al.  Discretionary Use of Computers: An Empirically Derived Explanatory Model* , 1991 .

[44]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[45]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[46]  L. Hayduk.  Structural equation modeling with LISREL , 1987 .

[47]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Technology Diffusion: An Empirical Test of Competitive Effects , 1989 .

[48]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  EFFECTS OF ALTERNATIVE TRAINING METHODS ON SELF-EFFICACY AND PERFORMANCE IN COMPUTER SOFTWARE TRAINING , 1989 .

[49]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[50]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis , 1972 .

[51]  B. Muthén,et al.  Assessing Reliability and Stability in Panel Models , 1977 .

[52]  Cynthia M. Jackson,et al.  Toward an Understanding of the Behavioral Intention to Use an Information System , 1997 .

[53]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.

[54]  William J. Doll,et al.  The measurement of end-user software involvement , 1990 .

[55]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Behind the learning curve: a sketch of the learning process , 1991 .

[56]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model , 1997, MIS Q..

[57]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  The psychological origins of perceived usefulness and ease-of-use , 1999, Inf. Manag..

[58]  M. Treacy,et al.  Utilization as a dependent variable in MIS research , 2015, DATB.

[59]  Peter M. Ginter,et al.  A Social Learning Approach to Strategic Management: Toward a Theoretical Foundation , 1982 .

[60]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  Influence of Computer Attitude and Self-Efficacy on IT Usage Behavior , 2001, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[61]  L. Cronbach,et al.  Aptitudes and instructional methods: A handbook for research on interactions , 1977 .

[62]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[63]  Fred D. Davis.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: System Characteristics, User Perceptions and Behavioral Impacts , 1993, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[64]  V. Lai,et al.  An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach , 1997 .

[65]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Post-Adoption Behavior in the Context of Online Services , 1998, Inf. Syst. Res..

[66]  R. Hoyle.  The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues. , 1995 .

[67]  S. Shott,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics , 2018, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[68]  J. D. Johnson,et al.  Communication and Innovation Implementation , 1984 .

[69]  Allen M. Weiss,et al.  Vendor Consideration and Switching Behavior for Buyers in High-Technology Markets , 1995 .

[70]  L. Chan,et al.  The adoption of new technology: the case of object-oriented computing in software companies , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[71]  Zahir Irani,et al.  Evaluating information technology in dynamic environments: a focus on tailorable information systems , 1999 .

[72]  Ali E. Akgün,et al.  Factors Impacting the Adoption and Effectiveness of the World Wide Web in Marketing , 2002 .

[73]  Shanthi Gopalakrishnan,et al.  The impact of organizational context on innovation adoption in commercial banks , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[74]  R. Dahlstrom,et al.  Buyer-seller relationships in the procurement of logistical services , 1996 .

[75]  Patrick Y. K. Chau,et al.  An Empirical Assessment of a Modified Technology Acceptance Model , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[76]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  A field study of the adoption of software process innovations by information systems professionals , 2000, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[77]  Jane M. Howell,et al.  Personal Computing: Toward a Conceptual Model of Utilization , 1991, MIS Q..

[78]  A. Shapiro,et al.  Robustness of normal theory methods in the analysis of linear latent variate models. , 1988 .

[79]  K. Ramamurthy,et al.  The Role of Interorganizational and Organizational Factors on the Decision Mode for Adoption of Interorganizational Systems , 1995 .

[80]  Michael J. Gallivan,et al.  Organizational adoption and assimilation of complex technological innovations: development and application of a new framework , 2001, DATB.

[81]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Perceived Usefulness, Ease of Use, and Usage of Information Technology: A Replication , 1992, MIS Q..

[82]  M. Peters,et al.  THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN SUPPORTING THE EXTENDED SUPPLY CHAIN , 2001 .

[83]  Y. Wind,et al.  Industrial buying and creative marketing , 1967 .

[84]  D. Kaplan.  Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[85]  Sang M. Lee,et al.  An Empirical Study of the Relationships among End-User Information Systems Acceptance, Training, and Effectiveness , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[86]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[87]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach , 2001, Decis. Sci..

[88]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  User Acceptance Enablers in Individual Decision Making About Technology: Toward an Integrated Model , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[89]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience , 1995 .

[90]  Timothy R. Hinkin,et al.  A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires , 1998 .

[91]  Waiman Cheung,et al.  Determinants of the intention to use Internet/WWW at work: a confirmatory study , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[92]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[93]  Olivia R. Liu Sheng,et al.  Examining the Technology Acceptance Model Using Physician Acceptance of Telemedicine Technology , 1999, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[94]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The antecedents and consequents of user perceptions in information technology adoption , 1998, Decis. Support Syst..

[95]  W. W. Daniel.  Applied Nonparametric Statistics , 1979 .

[96]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[97]  Lei-da Chen,et al.  Technology Adaptation in E-Commerce: Key Determinants of Virtual Stores Acceptance , 2004 .

[98]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test† , 1996 .

[99]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Examining a Model of Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: An Exploratory Study , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[100]  Susan A. Brown,et al.  Reaping the benefits of innovative IT: the long and winding road , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[101]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[102]  Gary K. Hunter.  Sales technology, relationship-forging tasks, and sales performance in business markets , 1999 .

[103]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[104]  Norbert F. Elbert,et al.  QUESTIONNAIRE VALIDATION BY CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS: AN IMPROVEMENT OVER MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRICES* , 1979 .

[105]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[106]  Ronald M. Lee,et al.  A logic programming framework for planning and simulation , 1986 .

[107]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[108]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[109]  Magid Igbaria,et al.  The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage , 1995 .

[110]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Statistical Procedures and the Justification of Knowledge in Psychological Science , 1989 .

[111]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[112]  A. Bandura.  Social learning theory , 1977 .

[113]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[114]  Madhavan Parthasarathy,et al.  Salesforce automation and the adoption of technological innovations by salespeople: Theory and implications , 1997 .

[115]  Euehun Lee,et al.  ASSESSING LOGISTICS TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION TIME WITH EVENT HISTORY ANALYSIS , 2000 .

[116]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs , 1999, MIS Q..

[117]  Gary L. Frazier,et al.  Outcome-Based and Behavior-Based Coordination Efforts in Channel Relationships , 1996 .