A Root Awakening: Vocabulary Instruction for Older Students with Reading Difficulties

There is reliable evidence that new vocabulary is primarily acquired through wide independent reading. However, struggling readers tend to avoid reading, resulting in limited word encounters and inadequate vocabulary growth, and they often have difficulties inferring the meanings of new words from context. While there are no clear solutions to the problem of vocabulary acquisition for older students with reading difficulties, there are instructional approaches that have some evidence of effectiveness for this population. We describe the research base and promising practices related to three aspects of vocabulary instruction: (1) creating a verbal learning environment that fosters word consciousness, (2) selecting and teaching specific words, and (3) teaching an independent word learning strategy through a combination of contextual and morphemic analysis. These instructional approaches are grounded in overarching principles recognized by researchers as being characteristic of effective instruction for students with learning difficulties, including explicit instruction, promoting cognitive and collaborative engagement, and providing many opportunities for practice, including distributed practice, with teacher feedback. Finally, we discuss the possibilities inherent in a cross-content schoolwide approach to vocabulary instruction at the secondary level. We conclude with a call for additional research examining the effectiveness of instructional approaches to vocabulary development for secondary school students with reading difficulties, including a schoolwide collaborative model.

[1]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Reading Research for Students with LD , 1999, Journal of learning disabilities.

[2]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  Collaborative Strategic Reading during Social Studies in Heterogeneous Fourth-Grade Classrooms , 1998, The Elementary School Journal.

[3]  Wesley C. Becker,et al.  Teaching Reading and Language to the Disadvantaged--What We Have Learned from Field Research. , 1977 .

[4]  D. Mahony Using sensitivity to word structure to explain variance in high school and college level reading ability , 1994 .

[5]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words , 1985 .

[6]  Diane Pedrotty Bryant,et al.  Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Research , 2003 .

[7]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  How Many Words are There in Printed School English , 1984 .

[8]  K. Stanovich Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. , 1986 .

[9]  C. Bos,et al.  Effects of Interactive Vocabulary Instruction on the Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension of Junior-High Learning Disabled Students , 1990 .

[10]  Katherine Wysocki,et al.  Deriving Word Meanings through Morphological Generalization. , 1987 .

[11]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  The Acquisition of Word Meaning from Context by Children of High and Low Ability. Outstanding Dissertation Monograph 1985. , 1985 .

[12]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  Teaching morphemic and contextual analysis to fifth‐grade students , 2002 .

[13]  D. Carnine Utilization of Contextual Information in Determining the Meaning of Unfamiliar Words. , 1984 .

[14]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Morphological families in the internal lexicon , 1989 .

[15]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Development of morphological awareness in Chinese and English , 2003 .

[16]  H. Swanson,et al.  Instructing Adolescents with Learning Disabilities , 2003, Journal of learning disabilities.

[17]  W. Nagy,et al.  Contributions of morphology beyond phonology to literacy outcomes of upper elementary and middle-school students. , 2006 .

[18]  Connie Juel,et al.  Making Words Stick. , 2004 .

[19]  Sharon Vaughn,et al.  The Underlying Message in LD Intervention Research: Findings from Research Syntheses , 2000 .

[20]  Patricia A. Herman,et al.  Learning Words from Context. , 1985 .

[21]  J. Carlisle,et al.  Effects of word and morpheme familiarity on reading of derived words , 2006 .

[22]  C. Bos,et al.  The Effects of an Interactive Instructional Strategy for Enhancing Reading Comprehension and Content Area Learning for Students with Learning Disabilities , 1989, Journal of learning disabilities.

[23]  R. Fukkink,et al.  Effects of Instruction in Deriving Word Meaning from Context: A Meta-Analysis , 1998 .

[24]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  What Research Says about Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities , 2004 .

[25]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[26]  Douglas Carnine,et al.  Three procedures for presenting minimally different positive and negative instances. , 1980 .

[27]  J. M. Anglin Vocabulary Development: A Morphological Analysis , 1994 .

[28]  M. Pressley,et al.  The Mnemonic Keyword Method , 1982 .

[29]  J. R. Jenkins,et al.  Vocabulary Instruction: Effects on Word Knowledge and Reading Comprehension , 1982 .

[30]  J. Torgesen The Role of Nonspecific Factors in the Task Performance of Learning Disabled Children , 1977 .

[31]  L. Fuchs,et al.  Teaching Reading Comprehension Strategies to Students With Learning Disabilities: A Review of Research , 2001 .

[32]  V. Berninger,et al.  It’s never too late to remediate: Teaching word recognition to students with reading disabilities in grades 4–7 , 1999 .

[33]  Cor Aarnoutse,et al.  Effects of an Instructional Programme for Deriving Word Meanings. , 1998 .

[34]  J. Carlisle Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading , 2000 .

[35]  Michael J. Kieffer,et al.  Breaking Down Words to Build Meaning: Morphology, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in the Urban Classroom , 2007 .

[36]  Edward J. Kameenui,et al.  Vocabulary Tricks: Effects of Instruction in Morphology and Context on Fifth-Grade Students’Ability to Derive and Infer Word Meanings , 2003 .

[37]  B. Wong Activating the Inactive Learner: Use of Questions/Prompts to Enhance Comprehension and Retention of Implied Information in Learning Disabled Children , 1980 .

[38]  María S. Carlo,et al.  Closing the gap: Addressing the vocabulary needs of English‐language learners in bilingual and mainstream classrooms , 2004 .

[39]  C. Stone,et al.  Exploring the Role of Morphemes in Word Reading. , 2005 .

[40]  H. Lee Swanson,et al.  Instructing Adolescents with Learning Disabilities: A Component and Composite Analysis , 2001 .

[41]  R. P. Carver Percentage of Unknown Vocabulary Words in Text as a Function of the Relative Difficulty of the text: Implications for Instruction , 1994 .

[42]  T. Scruggs,et al.  Reading Comprehension Instruction for Secondary Students: Challenges for Struggling Students and Teachers , 2003 .

[43]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Morphological Awareness and Learning to Read: A Cross-Language Perspective , 2006 .

[44]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Effects of Family Size for Complex Words , 2000 .

[45]  Virginia A. Mann,et al.  The relation between reading ability and morphological skills: Evidence from derivational suffixes , 2000 .