Strategic treatment optimization for HCV (STOPHCV1): a randomised controlled trial of ultrashort duration therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) has identified the need for a better understanding of which patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) can be cured with ultrashort course HCV therapy. Methods: A total of 202 individuals with chronic HCV were randomised to fixed-duration shortened therapy (8 weeks) vs variable-duration ultrashort strategies (VUS1/2). Participants not cured following first-line treatment were retreated with 12 weeks’ sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin. The primary outcome was sustained virological response 12 weeks (SVR12) after first-line treatment and retreatment. Participants were factorially randomised to receive ribavirin with first-line treatment. Results: All evaluable participants achieved SVR12 overall (197/197, 100% [95% CI 98-100]) demonstrating non-inferiority between fixed-duration and variable-duration strategies (difference 0% [95% CI -3.8%, +3.7%], 4% pre-specified non-inferiority margin). First-line SVR12 was 91% [86%-97%] (92/101) for fixed-duration vs 48% [39%-57%] (47/98) for variable-duration, but was significantly higher for VUS2 (72% [56%-87%] (23/32)) than VUS1 (36% [25%-48%] (24/66)). Overall, first-line SVR12 was 72% [65%-78%] (70/101) without ribavirin and 68% [61%-76%] (69/98) with ribavirin (p=0.48). At treatment failure, the emergence of viral resistance was lower with ribavirin (12% [2%-30%] (3/26)) than without (38% [21%-58%] (11/29), p=0.01). Conclusions: Unsuccessful first-line short-course therapy did not compromise retreatment with sofosbuvir/ledipasvir/ribavirin (100% SVR12). SVR12 rates were significantly increased when ultrashort treatment varied between 4-7 weeks rather than 4-6 weeks. Ribavirin significantly reduced resistance emergence in those failing first-line therapy. ISRCTN Registration: 37915093 (11/04/2016).

[1]  G. Cooke,et al.  Treatment optimisation for hepatitis C in the era of combination direct-acting antiviral therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019, Wellcome open research.

[2]  C. Spencer,et al.  A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Shortened Direct-Acting Antiviral Treatment in Genotype 1 Noncirrhotic Treatment-Naive Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Virus , 2019, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[3]  L. Madsen,et al.  THU-193-4 week treatment for hepatitis C: A randomized controlled trial (4RIBC) , 2019, Journal of Hepatology.

[4]  M. Martinello,et al.  Management of acute HCV in the era of direct-acting antivirals: implications for elimination. , 2019, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  R. Fontana,et al.  Hepatitis C Guidance 2018 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection. , 2018, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[6]  Jean-Michel Pawlotsky,et al.  EASL Recommendations on Treatment of Hepatitis C 2018. , 2018, Journal of hepatology.

[7]  J. Bukh,et al.  Antiviral Effect of Ribavirin against HCV Associated with Increased Frequency of G-to-A and C-to-U Transitions in Infectious Cell Culture Model , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[8]  G. Indolfi Guidelines for the care and treatment of persons diagnosed with chronic hepatitis C virus infection , 2018 .

[9]  M. Dickie,et al.  Global Health Sector Strategy on Viral Hepatitis : What does it mean for Canadians ? , 2018 .

[10]  M. Curry,et al.  No one size fits all—Shortening duration of therapy with direct‐acting antivirals for hepatitis C genotype 1 infection , 2017, Journal of viral hepatitis.

[11]  T. Asselah,et al.  Ombitasvir, paritaprevir, and ritonavir plus dasabuvir for 8 weeks in previously untreated patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1b infection without cirrhosis (GARNET): a single-arm, open-label, phase 3b trial. , 2017, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[12]  M. Yakoot,et al.  Response Tailored Protocol Versus the Fixed 12 Weeks Course of Dual Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Treatment in Egyptian Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Genotype-4 Infection: A Randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial , 2017, EBioMedicine.

[13]  J. Pawlotsky,et al.  Ribavirin revisited in the era of direct‐acting antiviral therapy for hepatitis C virus infection , 2016, Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver.

[14]  Bing Li,et al.  Efficacy and safety of 3-week response-guided triple direct-acting antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis C infection: a phase 2, open-label, proof-of-concept study. , 2016, The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology.

[15]  Paolo Piazza,et al.  Comparison of Next-Generation Sequencing Technologies for Comprehensive Assessment of Full-Length Hepatitis C Viral Genomes , 2016, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[16]  M. Stepanova,et al.  Adherence to treatment of chronic hepatitis C: from interferon containing regimens to interferon and ribavirin free regimens , 2016, Medicine.

[17]  Laetitia Canini,et al.  HCV kinetic and modeling analyses indicate similar time to cure among sofosbuvir combination regimens with daclatasvir, simeprevir or ledipasvir. , 2016, Journal of hepatology.

[18]  M. Proschan,et al.  High adherence to all-oral directly acting antiviral HCV therapy among an inner-city patient population in a phase 2a study , 2015, Hepatology International.

[19]  T. Pilot‐Matias,et al.  Phase 2b trial of interferon-free therapy for hepatitis C virus genotype 1. , 2014, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  M. Buti,et al.  Response‐guided peg‐interferon plus ribavirin treatment duration in chronic hepatitis C: Meta‐analyses of randomized, controlled trials and implications for the future , 2011, Hepatology.

[21]  K. Yoshioka,et al.  Liver stiffness measured by transient elastography correlates with fibrosis area in liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C , 2009, Hepatology research : the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology.