Performance analysis for randomly distributed mixed carbon nanotube bundle interconnects

During the recent past, carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have rapidly gained importance in an intensely growing researched area of interconnects. For various reasons, bundled CNTs are often preferred over single-walled CNTs (SWCNTs) or multi-walled CNTs (MWCNTs). However, during fabrication, it is difficult to control the growth of a densely packed bundle having SWCNTs with uniform diameters or MWCNTs with an identical number of shells. Therefore, a realistic CNT bundle is in fact a mixed CNT bundle (MCB) that consists of SWCNTs and MWCNTs. In light of these facts, an analytical model of a MCB that follows the random distribution of CNTs in a bundle is introduced. Depending on the probability of distribution of CNTs having different diameters, a compact multi-conductor transmission line (MTL) and a simplified equivalent single conductor (ESC) model are presented. Encouragingly, the simplified ESC model exhibits an average error of only 2.44% at different interconnect lengths compared with the delay obtained through the MTL approach. Mean diameter and tube density of the MCB are mapped to the ESC model to analyse the propagation delay, power dissipation and crosstalk. Irrespective of interconnect lengths, it is observed that the performances are significantly improved for higher tube density in a MCB.

[1]  Qing Huo Liu,et al.  Electrothermal Characterization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube (SWCNT) Interconnect Arrays , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[2]  M. S. Sarto,et al.  Single-Conductor Transmission-Line Model of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[3]  S. K. Manhas,et al.  Analysis of crosstalk delay and power dissipation in mixed CNT bundle interconnects , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Communications, Devices and Intelligent Systems (CODIS).

[4]  J. Meindl,et al.  Performance Modeling for Single- and Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes as Signal and Power Interconnects in Gigascale Systems , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[5]  D. Rossi,et al.  Modeling Crosstalk Effects in CNT Bus Architectures , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[6]  Brajesh Kumar Kaushik,et al.  Delay and crosstalk reliability issues in mixed MWCNT bundle interconnects , 2014, Microelectron. Reliab..

[7]  N. D. Pandya,et al.  Dynamic crosstalk effect in mixed cnt bundle interconnects , 2012 .

[8]  Q.H. Liu,et al.  Crosstalk Prediction of Single- and Double-Walled Carbon-Nanotube (SWCNT/DWCNT) Bundle Interconnects , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[9]  A. Srivastava,et al.  Carbon nanotubes for next generation very large scale integration interconnects , 2010 .

[10]  Ching-Ping Wong,et al.  Growth and electrical characterization of high-aspect-ratio carbon nanotube arrays , 2006 .

[11]  K. Banerjee,et al.  Circuit Modeling and Performance Analysis of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotube Interconnects , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices.

[12]  M. Meyyappan,et al.  Bottom-up approach for carbon nanotube interconnects , 2003 .

[13]  A Naeemi,et al.  Ultralow-Power Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Interconnects for Subthreshold Circuits , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology.

[14]  Mircea R. Stan,et al.  Graphene devices, interconnect and circuits — challenges and opportunities , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems.

[15]  Wei Wang,et al.  Analyzing Conductance of Mixed Carbon-Nanotube Bundles for Interconnect Applications , 2007, IEEE Electron Device Letters.

[16]  Charles M. Lieber,et al.  Diameter-Controlled Synthesis of Carbon Nanotubes , 2002 .