Poker as a skill game: rational versus irrational behaviors

In many countries poker is one of the most popular card games. Although each variant of poker has its own rules, all involve the use of money to make the challenge meaningful. Nowadays, in the collective consciousness, some variants of poker are referred to as games of skill, others as gambling. A poker table can be viewed as a psychology lab, where human behavior can be observed and quantified. This work provides a preliminary analysis of the role of rationality in poker games, using a stylized version of Texas Hold'em. In particular, we compare the performance of two different kinds of players, i.e. rational versus irrational players, during a poker tournament. Results show that these behaviors (i.e. rationality and irrationality) affect both the outcomes of challenges and the way poker should be classified.

[1]  Kenji Suzuki,et al.  Comparative Study of Human Behavior in Card Playing with a Humanoid Playmate , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[2]  Serge Galam,et al.  Local dynamics vs. social mechanisms: A unifying frame , 2005 .

[3]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Social Dilemmas and Cooperation in Complex Networks , 2006 .

[4]  D. Stauffer Introduction to statistical physics outside physics , 2003, cond-mat/0310037.

[5]  A. Guazzini,et al.  Bluffing as a Rational Strategy in a Simple Poker-Like Game Model , 2013 .

[6]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial intelligence - a modern approach, 2nd Edition , 2003, Prentice Hall series in artificial intelligence.

[7]  Marco Alberto Javarone The Role of the Shannon Entropy in the Identification of Acronyms , 2014, CompleNet.

[8]  C. Toward Legalization of Poker : The Skill vs . Chance Debate , 2012 .

[9]  Wulf Albers,et al.  Social dilemmas and cooperation , 1994 .

[10]  S. Fortunato,et al.  Statistical physics of social dynamics , 2007, 0710.3256.

[11]  Chi Ho Yeung,et al.  Networking—a statistical physics perspective , 2011, 1110.2931.

[12]  J. M. Kelly,et al.  Poker and the Law: Is It a Game of Skill or Chance and Legally Does It Matter? , 2007 .

[13]  Steven E. Phelan,et al.  Bluffing and betting behavior in a simplified poker game , 2009 .

[14]  David Sklansky,et al.  Hold'Em Poker for Advanced Players , 1999 .

[15]  Henrique Lopes Cardoso,et al.  Computing card probabilities in Texas Hold'em , 2013, 2013 8th Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI).

[16]  Serge Galam,et al.  SOCIOPHYSICS: A REVIEW OF GALAM MODELS , 2008, 0803.1800.

[17]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Reducing financial avalanches by random investments. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Giuliano Armano,et al.  Emergence of acronyms in a community of language users , 2013 .

[19]  K. Sznajd-Weron,et al.  Anticonformity or Independence?—Insights from Statistical Physics , 2013 .

[20]  Peter Norvig,et al.  Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach , 1995 .

[21]  Giuliano Armano,et al.  Perception of similarity: a model for social network dynamics , 2013 .

[22]  Serge Galam,et al.  Sociophysics: a personal testimony , 2004, physics/0403122.

[23]  Alessandro Pluchino,et al.  The Beneficial Role of Random Strategies in Social and Financial Systems , 2012, Journal of Statistical Physics.

[24]  Fredrik A. Dahl,et al.  A Reinforcement Learning Algorithm Applied to Simplified Two-Player Texas Hold'em Poker , 2001, ECML.