A new approach to multicultural item generation in the development of two obesity-specific measures: the Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life (OWLQOL) questionnaire and the Weight-Related Symptom Measure (WRSM).

BACKGROUND Being overweight or obese has substantial effects on individuals' perceptions of their health and quality of life (QoL). Generic measures often miss important QoL information, and existing obesity-specific instruments have shortcomings with respect to cross-cultural input, application to differing levels of severity, conceptual clarity, and patient burden. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to develop culturally sensitive measures of QoL and symptoms in overweight or obese persons, both those trying to lose weight and those not trying to lose weight. METHODS Currently accepted criteria and guidelines for questionnaire development were streamlined and augmented to include cross-cultural input from 5 European countries and the United States. The preliminary pool of items was created based on qualitative interviews conducted in the United States, followed by an early check of item translatability and preharmonization across all languages. Ten additional qualitative in-country interviews were then conducted to produce further culture-specific items. This was followed by 2 forward and 1 backward translation, plus cognitive debriefing interviews in each country. Finally, an expanded international harmonization meeting was held to ensure inclusion of appropriate new items and their acceptability across all 6 cultures. RESULTS The procedures described resulted in development of the 41-item Obesity and Weight Loss Quality of Life questionnaire and the 20-item Weight-Related Symptom Measure. These questionnaires are subject to further psychometric validation. CONCLUSIONS Augmentation of the initial item-generation and international harmonization steps of questionnaire development through integration of cross-cultural input allowed greater validity of cross-cultural content while meeting time, budget, and resource constraints.

[1]  K. Flegal,et al.  Increasing Prevalence of Overweight Among US Adults: The National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 1960 to 1991 , 1994 .

[2]  C. Tse,et al.  Assessing Impact of Weight on Quality of Life. , 1995, Obesity research.

[3]  J. Seidell,et al.  Quality of life in relation to overweight and body fat distribution. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[4]  J. Berry,et al.  Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research , 1986 .

[5]  S. Hunt.  Cross-Cultural Comparability of Quality of Life Measures , 1993 .

[6]  T. Wagner,et al.  Cross-Cultural Validation of Quality of Life Measures , 1994 .

[7]  A. Stunkard,et al.  The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. , 1985, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[8]  F. Pi‐Sunyer,et al.  Medical Hazards of Obesity , 1993, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[9]  K. Fontaine,et al.  Health-related quality of life among obese persons seeking and not currently seeking treatment. , 2000, The International journal of eating disorders.

[10]  R. Deyo,et al.  Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life , 1989, Medical care.

[11]  J. Seidell,et al.  The impact of obesity on health status: some implications for health care costs. , 1995, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[12]  Claude Bouchard,et al.  Clinical guidelines on the identification, evaluation, and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: Executive summary , 1998 .

[13]  W. Kuyken,et al.  Quality of Life Assessment: International Perspectives , 1994, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[14]  C. Bouchard,et al.  Swedish obese subjects (SOS)--an intervention study of obesity. Baseline evaluation of health and psychosocial functioning in the first 1743 subjects examined. , 1993, International journal of obesity and related metabolic disorders : journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity.

[15]  D. Patrick,et al.  Assessing health-related quality-of-life and health state preference in persons with obesity: a validation study , 1997, Quality of Life Research.

[16]  D. Patrick,et al.  Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach , 1994, Quality of Life Research.

[17]  B. Spilker,et al.  Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials , 1996 .

[18]  D A Revicki,et al.  Recommendations for evaluating the validity of quality of life claims for labeling and promotion. , 1999, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[19]  D. Patrick,et al.  Health Status and Health Policy: Quality of Life in Health Care Evaluation and Resource Allocation , 1993 .

[20]  David Cella,et al.  Cross-cultural instrument equating: Current research and future directions , 1996 .

[21]  M. Sullivan,et al.  Swedish obese subjects (SOS) – an intervention study of obesity. Two-year follow-up of health-related quality of life (HRQL) and eating behavior after gastric surgery for severe obesity , 1998, International Journal of Obesity.

[22]  J. Seidell.  Time Trends in Obesity: An Epidemiological Perspective , 1997, Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme.