Laserchicken - A tool for distributed feature calculation from massive LiDAR point cloud datasets

Abstract Point cloud datasets provided by LiDAR have become an integral part in many research fields including archaeology, forestry, and ecology. Facilitated by technological advances, the volume of these datasets has steadily increased, with modern airborne laser scanning surveys now providing high-resolution, (super-)national scale, multi-terabyte point clouds. However, their wider scientific exploitation is hindered by the scarcity of open source software tools capable of handling the challenges of accessing, processing, and extracting meaningful information from massive datasets, as well as by the domain-specificity of existing tools. Here we present Laserchicken, a user-extendable, cross-platform Python tool for extracting statistical properties of flexibly defined subsets of point cloud data, aimed at enabling efficient, scalable, distributed processing of multi-terabyte datasets. We demonstrate Laserchicken’s ability to unlock these transformative new resources, e.g. in macroecology and species distribution modelling, where it is used to characterize the 3D vegetation structure at high resolution ( 10  m) across whole countries or regions. We further discuss its potential as a domain agnostic, flexible tool that can also facilitate novel applications in other research fields.

[1]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  A Comprehensive Automated 3D Approach for Building Extraction, Reconstruction, and Regularization from Airborne Laser Scanning Point Clouds , 2008, Sensors.

[2]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  OPALS - A framework for Airborne Laser Scanning data analysis , 2014, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[3]  Martin Rutzinger,et al.  Detection of building regions using airborne LiDAR : a new combination of raster and point cloud based GIS methods , 2009 .

[4]  Martin Isenburg,et al.  Generating Raster DEM from Mass Points Via TIN Streaming , 2006, GIScience.

[5]  Soyeon Bae,et al.  Comparison of airborne lidar, aerial photography, and field surveys to model the habitat suitability of a cryptic forest species – the hazel grouse , 2014 .

[6]  F. Crosilla,et al.  LiDAR data filtering and classification by skewness and kurtosis iterative analysis of multiple point cloud data categories , 2013 .

[7]  Graziano Pesole,et al.  Towards global interoperability for supporting biodiversity research on essential biodiversity variables (EBVs) , 2015 .

[8]  E. Næsset Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data , 2002 .

[9]  Peter Dorninger,et al.  Automated recognition of quasi‐planar ignimbrite sheets as paleosurfaces via robust segmentation of digital elevation models: an example from the Central Andes , 2014 .

[10]  Eduardo Dias,et al.  Using modular 3D digital earth applications based on point clouds for the study of complex sites , 2016, Int. J. Digit. Earth.

[11]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Assessment of Low Density Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning for Individual Tree Detection and Tree Species Classification , 2014 .

[12]  Martin Isenburg,et al.  Streaming computation of Delaunay triangulations , 2006, ACM Trans. Graph..

[13]  Michael Wimmer,et al.  Efficient tree modeling from airborne LiDAR point clouds , 2017, Comput. Graph..

[14]  A. C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  eEcoLiDAR, eScience infrastructure for ecological applications of LiDAR point clouds: reconstructing the 3D ecosystem structure for animals at regional to continental scales , 2017 .

[15]  Willem Bouten,et al.  UvA-DARE ( Digital Academic Repository ) Identification of Linear Vegetation Elements in a Rural Landscape Using LiDAR Point , 2019 .

[16]  Gottfried Mandlburger,et al.  THE OPALS DATA MANAGER - EFFICIENT DATA MANAGEMENT FOR PROCESSING LARGE AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING PROJECTS , 2012 .

[17]  Bernhard Höfle,et al.  URBAN TREE CLASSIFICATION USING FULL-WAVEFORM AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING , 2016 .

[18]  Norbert Pfeifer,et al.  Categorizing Wetland Vegetation by Airborne Laser Scanning on Lake Balaton and Kis-Balaton, Hungary , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[19]  Rachel Opitz,et al.  Using Airborne LiDAR Survey to explore Historic-era archaeological landscapes of Montserrat in the Eastern Caribbean , 2015 .

[20]  Laure Nuninger,et al.  Point Clouds Segmentation of Mixed Scenes with Archeological Standing Remains: A Multi-Criteria and Multi-Scale Iterative Approach , 2014 .

[21]  Arie C. Seijmonsbergen,et al.  Use and categorization of Light Detection and Ranging vegetation metrics in avian diversity and species distribution research , 2019, Diversity and Distributions.

[22]  Michael Weinmann,et al.  A Classification-Segmentation Framework for the Detection of Individual Trees in Dense MMS Point Cloud Data Acquired in Urban Areas , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[23]  Kazuo Aoyama,et al.  Monumental architecture at Aguada Fénix and the rise of Maya civilization , 2020, Nature.

[24]  N. Pettorelli,et al.  Essential Biodiversity Variables , 2013, Science.

[25]  Gregory P Asner,et al.  Advances in animal ecology from 3D-LiDAR ecosystem mapping. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[26]  Erik Schultes,et al.  The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship , 2016, Scientific Data.

[27]  Alexandre Escolà,et al.  Application of light detection and ranging and ultrasonic sensors to high-throughput phenotyping and precision horticulture: current status and challenges , 2018, Horticulture Research.

[28]  J W Head,et al.  Topography of the northern hemisphere of Mars from the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter. , 1998, Science.

[29]  F Morsdorf,et al.  Standardizing Ecosystem Morphological Traits from 3D Information Sources. , 2020, Trends in ecology & evolution.